Theme: Reform

  • Use Stimulus by Rate of Response and Effect

    Mar 18, 2020, 9:04 PM There’s never been a worse time for fiscal stimulus – Econlib econlib.org

    There’s never been a worse time for fiscal stimulus
    STIMULUS BY RATE OF RESPONSE AND EFFECT MONETARY stimulus refers to lowering interest rates, quantitative easing, or other ways of increasing the amount of money or credit. DIRECT stimulus (my term) refers to direct distribution of cash to consumers who can then alter the structure of production with collective (‘state’,’environmental’) indirect debt rather than individual, family, business and industry debt. this is the ONLY method of preventing exaggerated worldwide demand, network, and price recalculation, in the face of ignorance. Giving consumers liquidity removes IGNORANCE (uncertainty) while the economy changes. It is ignorance, uncertainty, and recalculation by trial and error under duress that causes undesirable economic contractions rather than desirable economic adaptations. DEBT NATIONALIZATION (my term) refers to paying down consumer credit all mortgages and granting credit to those with paid or substantially paid mortgages. RESCUE INVESTMENT (my term) – Providing loans directly to business industry in response to shocks, so that they can survive or even motball during recessions. NATIONALIZATION refers to the state taking over the ownership of a STRATEGIC industry, providing necessary cash reserves and cash-flow while the necessary organization adapts to shocks (temporary) or change (permanent). However, investors must be zeroed during this time and may only buy back their interest for having failed to preserve enough liquidity to insure against shocks. In this case the state buys the company for nothing, and resells it. FISCAL stimulus refers to increasing government consumption or transfers or lowering taxes. Effectively this means increasing the rate of growth of public debt, except that particularly Keynesians often assume that the stimulus will cause sufficient economic growth to fill that gap partially or completely. See multiplier (economics).

  • (((libertarians))) are almost more of an impediment to P-type progress than left

    (((libertarians))) are almost more of an impediment to P-type progress than leftists https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/libertarians-are-almost-more-of-an-impediment-to-p-type-progress-than-leftists/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 19:09:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266084239973462018

  • (((libertarians))) are almost more of an impediment to P-type progress than leftists

    Mar 23, 2020, 3:26 PM by NJ Gregory It’s paradoxically bizarre because (((libertarians))) are almost more of an impediment to P-type progress than leftists… Because leftists we can just shove out of the way. But the libertarian sect needs more effort and “red pills” to be woken up. Libertarianism is a kind of a political cop out, kind of fence sitting. (CD: it’s the reason for libertarianism: escaping cost of the commons. free riding.)

  • (((libertarians))) are almost more of an impediment to P-type progress than leftists

    Mar 23, 2020, 3:26 PM by NJ Gregory It’s paradoxically bizarre because (((libertarians))) are almost more of an impediment to P-type progress than leftists… Because leftists we can just shove out of the way. But the libertarian sect needs more effort and “red pills” to be woken up. Libertarianism is a kind of a political cop out, kind of fence sitting. (CD: it’s the reason for libertarianism: escaping cost of the commons. free riding.)

  • Criticizing Conservative vs Libertarian Thinkers

    Mar 23, 2020, 5:19 PM Why can’t we criticize conservative thinkers? Because they’re either jurists who didn’t solve the underlying problem, historians that don’t propose any meaningful solutions, moralists that have failed to defeat the false promises of the left, theologians who do nothing but change seats on the sinking ship. It’s easier to criticize libertarianism because they’re less wrong in analysis, even if they’re more wrong in presumptions of man and possible solutions. You don’t learn much from saying ‘you said nothing actionable’. You learn more from saying ‘you said something only half actionable’.

  • Criticizing Conservative vs Libertarian Thinkers

    Mar 23, 2020, 5:19 PM Why can’t we criticize conservative thinkers? Because they’re either jurists who didn’t solve the underlying problem, historians that don’t propose any meaningful solutions, moralists that have failed to defeat the false promises of the left, theologians who do nothing but change seats on the sinking ship. It’s easier to criticize libertarianism because they’re less wrong in analysis, even if they’re more wrong in presumptions of man and possible solutions. You don’t learn much from saying ‘you said nothing actionable’. You learn more from saying ‘you said something only half actionable’.

  • The Iron Gauntlet, Reformation of Smithian Political Economy

    The Iron Gauntlet, Reformation of Smithian Political Economy: https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/the-iron-gauntlet-reformation-of-smithian-political-economy/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 12:35:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265985069472251904

  • that will evolve us into the mankind we wish we had

    that will evolve us into the mankind we wish we had https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/that-will-evolve-us-into-the-mankind-we-wish-we-had/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 18:57:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265718834700390401

  • That Will Evolve Us Into the Mankind We Wish We Had

    Oct 5, 2019, 11:06 AM

    —I designed a science, logic, law, and government for the mankind we have not the mankind we wish we had – but that will evolve us into the mankind we wish we had.– Curt Doolittle

  • That Will Evolve Us Into the Mankind We Wish We Had

    Oct 5, 2019, 11:06 AM

    —I designed a science, logic, law, and government for the mankind we have not the mankind we wish we had – but that will evolve us into the mankind we wish we had.– Curt Doolittle