(The best explanation you will find anywhere)

The first generations of feminism from (a) women’s rights to (b) women’s suffrage movement converted into (c) first wave feminism, again primarily legal rights – especially in marriage – and voting rights.

Until this point it’s fully christian and a just adaptation to women’s capacity outside the home after the industrial revolution, the availability of education, and sufficient suppression of scarcity because of the industrial revolution that people had the freedom to even imagine any form of self sufficiency outside of a family structure.

But, beginning with (d) Second Wave Jewish feminism, by Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Simone de Beauvoir. starting in the 1960s went beyond rights to privileges obtained by political means – sedition against the institution of the family and wester civ. In other words, the conversion of marxist means of sedition by the working classes to marxist sedition by women.

Then (e) Third Wave Feminism of Rebecca Walker, Judith Butler, bell hooks (Gloria Jean Watson), continued the marxist means of sedition adopted into feminism by Jewish feminists, and expanded it from sex marxism (women’s rent seeking) into continues sedition by claiming the sexes and gender roles are irrelevant and instead of a our historical informal and formal institutions creating a compromise between the sexes, claiming it was oppressive.

When, as unpleasant as it sounds, the opposite was true, paternalism was a male responsibility to the rest of the polity for “domesticating a naturally anti-social, anti-political, anti-economic sex into equal responsibility for self, private and common, by prohibiting externalizing costs upon others.”

Which was a set of outcomes that were predicted, because of women’s natural inability to restrict impulses for hyperconsumption, hypergamy, hyper-attention, hyper-manipulation, and the use of anti-social warfare to obtain what they could not by merit alone – and all of which now come to fruition as the destruction of intersexual cooperation, mating, reproduction, family, and family as the first institution of production of citizens capable of persisting our high trust civilization, and the resulting possibility of a participatory (democratic) polity in the absence of arbitrary authority.

Why? women always vote to evade responsibility rather than to demand it’s adoption and demonstration. “Get men to pay for it.”

So what is the female strategy, what is the marxist strategy, what is the feminist marxist strategy, and what is the woke race-marxist strategy?

It’s a revolt against the demand for responsibility for self, private and common, necessary to produce a western civilizational polity capable of the suppression of authority by mutual insurance of self determination by self determined means, by insurance of sovereignty in one’s demonstrated investments and autonomy in their use of self and those investments without imposing on those of others.

In other words its the reversal of the process of human domestication that made advanced civilization possible by the claim domestication of the animal impulse is oppression rather than training necessary for political participation that was made possible only because of those demands for responsibility.

Then (f) fourth wave feminism by instinct rather than instruction, Digital activism and the use of social media to use gossiping rallying shaming undermining and canceling to circumvent the court and common law process. This is effectively the institutionalization of the female method of not only social and political warfare, but of the female method of government.

(Though that statement might take more explanation that I’m able to go into at the moment – I hope most of you will grasp it as a contrast of the male use of adversarial combat in court with the female use of warfare by rallying in public without the constraints of the court to testifiability, equity, and liability)

SUMMARY

a,b) Pre-Feminism: Women’s Suffrage and Women’s Rights Movements focused on legal rights, suffrage, and basic equality. Economic rights outside the home.

c) First-Wave Feminism: Legal and institutional equality, especially suffrage. Irresponsibility for marriage.

d) Second-Wave Feminism: Broader social equality, workplace, reproductive rights. Privileges over men. Irresponsibility for self regulation, especially of reproduction.

e) Third-Wave Feminism: Diversity, intersectionality, individualism. Privilege over white men, and extension of irresponsibility to others in order to obtain more privileges over men.

f) Fourth-Wave Feminism: Digital activism, combating sexual harassment, and utilizing social media for mobilization. Use of new technology to scale undermining to canceling, which is specifically a violation of our ancestral common law, that one is limited to court when one’s actions impose a material consequence upon others.

ANALYSIS

Why is it that none of these explanations of the feminist movement after equal legal rights and equal voting rights, are not seen through the lens of the female means of social warfare to obtain by seduction, victim claiming, undermining, and sedition, to justify female limited ability and will for self regulation of impulses and emotions, in order for her to evade responsibility for capitalization of private behavior and the necessary public norms to produce responsibility for that capitalization, to justify her instincts for hyper-consumption, hyper-attention, hypergamy, and to hide under cover of victimization, in favor of and the antisocial, anti-economic, and anti-political consequences that are the foundation the marxist means of sedition, then applied to anti-male, anti-responsibility, anti-western civilization, for exactly the same reasons.

With the result that all informal capital (knowledge, tradition, and behavior) and formal capital (institutions, including the work force, business and industry, education and the academy, and all political organization) are collapsing for the simple reason that women have claimed oppression instead of domestication, and the consequence of men’s failure to domesticate women, and women domesticate themselves across generations, has resulted in what is very close to civil war and civilizational collapse, including civilizational collapse by birth rates.

WHAT TO DO?

Unfortunately, we are at the point where the combination of feminism and the collapse of reproduction, women’s advocacy of massive immigration and diversity, and the end of the developing world being technologically and economically behind, and are about to enter what appears to be a depression that will last a few decades, including a new technology that will largely affect women in white collar roles.

So, I’m a little worried that just like the Italians, Germans, Russians, and Chinese, we’ll be beyond the point of demographic cultural economic and political recovery by the time that women’s behavior adapts to the new circumstances.

So as Machiavelli, the Romans, and the Spartans have warned us, inclusion of women in politics, like universal enfranchisement, simply poisons the well of responsibility upon which all civilizations depend for their persistence.

SOLUTION

I think there is a solution to the problem of including women, and that’s simply the equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behavior as that of men. (Which is what our traditional western ethics sought and achieved.)

And from that perspective, the problem is fixable. It’s just a question of whether we’re too late, or on time. 😉

Affections,
As always,
CD

WHERE FEMINISM WENT WRONG – FROM RIGHTS TO SEDITION – AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT
(The best understanding you will find anywhere)

A LITTLE HISTORY
The first generations of feminism from (a) women’s rights to (b) women’s suffrage movement converted into (c) first wave feminism, again primarily legal rights – especially in marriage – and voting rights.

Until this point it’s fully christian and a just adaptation to women’s capacity outside the home after the industrial revolution, the availability of education, and sufficient suppression of scarcity because of the industrial revolution that people had the freedom to even imagine any form of self sufficiency outside of a family structure.

But, beginning with (d) Second Wave Jewish feminism, by Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, Simone de Beauvoir. starting in the 1960s went beyond rights to privileges obtained by political means – sedition against the institution of the family and wester civ. In other words, the conversion of marxist means of sedition by the working classes to marxist sedition by women.

Then (e) Third Wave Feminism of Rebecca Walker, Judith Butler, bell hooks (Gloria Jean Watson), continued the marxist means of sedition adopted into feminism by Jewish feminists, and expanded it from sex marxism (women’s rent seeking) into continues sedition by claiming the sexes and gender roles are irrelevant and instead of a our historical informal and formal institutions creating a compromise between the sexes, claiming it was oppressive.

When, as unpleasant as it sounds, the opposite was true, paternalism was a male responsibility to the rest of the polity for “domesticating a naturally anti-social, anti-political, anti-economic sex into equal responsibility for self, private and common, by prohibiting externalizing costs upon others.”

Which was a set of outcomes that were predicted, because of women’s natural inability to restrict impulses for hyperconsumption, hypergamy, hyper-attention, hyper-manipulation, and the use of anti-social warfare to obtain what they could not by merit alone – and all of which now come to fruition as the destruction of intersexual cooperation, mating, reproduction, family, and family as the first institution of production of citizens capable of persisting our high trust civilization, and the resulting possibility of a participatory (democratic) polity in the absence of arbitrary authority.

Why? women always vote to evade responsibility rather than to demand it’s adoption and demonstration. “Get men to pay for it.”

So what is the female strategy, what is the marxist strategy, what is the feminist marxist strategy, and what is the woke race-marxist strategy?

It’s a revolt against the demand for responsibility for self, private and common, necessary to produce a western civilizational polity capable of the suppression of authority by mutual insurance of self determination by self determined means, by insurance of sovereignty in one’s demonstrated investments and autonomy in their use of self and those investments without imposing on those of others.

In other words its the reversal of the process of human domestication that made advanced civilization possible by the claim domestication of the animal impulse is oppression rather than training necessary for political participation that was made possible only because of those demands for responsibility.

Then (f) fourth wave feminism by instinct rather than instruction, Digital activism and the use of social media to use gossiping rallying shaming undermining and canceling to circumvent the court and common law process. This is effectively the institutionalization of the female method of not only social and political warfare, but of the female method of government.

(Though that statement might take more explanation that I’m able to go into at the moment – I hope most of you will grasp it as a contrast of the male use of adversarial combat in court with the female use of warfare by rallying in public without the constraints of the court to testifiability, equity, and liability)

SUMMARY
a,b) Pre-Feminism: Women’s Suffrage and Women’s Rights Movements focused on legal rights, suffrage, and basic equality. Economic rights outside the home.
c) First-Wave Feminism: Legal and institutional equality, especially suffrage. Irresponsibility for marriage.
d) Second-Wave Feminism: Broader social equality, workplace, reproductive rights. Privileges over men. Irresponsibility for self regulation, especially of reproduction.
e) Third-Wave Feminism: Diversity, intersectionality, individualism. Privilege over white men, and extension of irresponsibility to others in order to obtain more privileges over men.
f) Fourth-Wave Feminism: Digital activism, combating sexual harassment, and utilizing social media for mobilization. Use of new technology to scale undermining to canceling, which is specifically a violation of our ancestral common law, that one is limited to court when one’s actions impose a material consequence upon others.

ANALYSIS
Why is it that none of these explanations of the feminist movement after equal legal rights and equal voting rights, are not seen through the lens of the female means of social warfare to obtain by seduction, victim claiming, undermining, and sedition, to justify female limited ability and will for self regulation of impulses and emotions, in order for her to evade responsibility for capitalization of private behavior and the necessary public norms to produce responsibility for that capitalization, to justify her instincts for hyper-consumption, hyper-attention, hypergamy, and to hide under cover of victimization, in favor of and the antisocial, anti-economic, and anti-political consequences that are the foundation the marxist means of sedition, then applied to anti-male, anti-responsibility, anti-western civilization, for exactly the same reasons.

With the result that all informal capital (knowledge, tradition, and behavior) and formal capital (institutions, including the work force, business and industry, education and the academy, and all political organization) are collapsing for the simple reason that women have claimed oppression instead of domestication, and the consequence of men’s failure to domesticate women, and women domesticate themselves across generations, has resulted in what is very close to civil war and civilizational collapse, including civilizational collapse by birth rates.

WHAT TO DO?
Unfortunately, we are at the point where the combination of feminism and the collapse of reproduction, women’s advocacy of massive immigration and diversity, and the end of the developing world being technologically and economically behind, and are about to enter what appears to be a depression that will last a few decades, including a new technology that will largely affect women in white collar roles.

So, I’m a little worried that just like the Italians, Germans, Russians, and Chinese, we’ll be beyond the point of demographic cultural economic and political recovery by the time that women’s behavior adapts to the new circumstances.

So as Machiavelli, the Romans, and the Spartans have warned us, inclusion of women in politics, like universal enfranchisement, simply poisons the well of responsibility upon which all civilizations depend for their persistence.

SOLUTION
I think there is a solution to the problem of including women, and that’s simply the equal suppression in law of female antisocial and anti political behavior as that of men. (Which is what our traditional western ethics sought and achieved.)

And from that perspective, the problem is fixable. It’s just a question of whether we’re too late, or on time. 😉

Affections,
As always.
CD

Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa