Theme: Reform

  • We have to end the republican party with a new party

    We have to end the republican party with a new party.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-26 22:18:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419784128241803266

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1419781908934938628

  • No. Like I said, the Catholic Church simply failed to reform every single time.

    No. Like I said, the Catholic Church simply failed to reform every single time. When they failed in 1850 they failed for good. Yet the pivot was obvious: Jesus as love, w/ Natural Law, is the only solution to the brutality of the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God. They HAD BOTH!


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-22 19:16:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1418288977879179265

  • The Course of Any Revolutionary Victory

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law. Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’. It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’. The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible. But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. Revolution Comes.

  • The Course of Any Revolutionary Victory

    The Constitution was designed as a political organization for an alliance of traditional Germanic micro-states under traditional European natural law. The Bill of Rights was added to enumerate specific limitations on the state. But this enabled the lie: ‘Rights’ over Natural Law. Constitutional Rights were testable, and Natural Law was insufficiently articulated outside of Blackstone, Smith, Locke, and Hobbes. Like the common law, it was ASSUMED not stated. This opened the door to positive law (command) that violated Natural Law and the Common Law. Between the failure to articulate the natural law logic, and common law method, as the SCIENCE OF COOPERATION, then enumerating a subset of rights, then combining classical liberalism’s positive inspirations,with Jewish postwar Sophistry(Pilpul) Undermining(Critique), it ‘broke’. It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. So if you want rebellion, violence, religious rule, authoritarian rule – you’re asking for ‘feels’ not ‘reals’. You’re as bad as the left and women. If you have a brain, and you want victory, you have to choose ‘reals’ over ‘feels’. The Law, defended by a court, sherrifs, militia and an army is the only interpersonal, social, political, economic, and strategic operating system that does not require the people to share the same abilities, intuitions, feelings, experience, knowledge, and skill. Law is the solution: always. Not because it is best. But because it is the only solution possible. But to make and enforce law, constitution, legislation, regulation, policy, and procedure a people need the POWER to do so. That power must come from a combination of the force necessary to replace an evil state, AND solutions that for the majority are preferable to status quo. So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. Revolution Comes.

  • @fmerda Can you restate your question? I think our legal reforms, economic refor

    @fmerda Can you restate your question? I think our legal reforms, economic reforms, and policy reforms destroy the financial sector, by nationalizing all retirement, pensions, health, and insurance,schemes into the treasury; outlawing rent seeking and baiting into hazard (which means everything you object to), eliminates all income taxes on the laboring and working classes, and for all intents and purposes provides consumer credit at zero interest. I mean, it will dstroy the financial sector completely and create much closer to the singapore model. Combined with prohibiting student loans for non-stem courses, it will even defund most universities and push funding into the trades. Our policy of enacting the german apprenticeship model will have an equally beneficial impact. Our policy of right to repair, and labor price arbitrage on imports will equilibrate the economy. Our ‘everyone works’ will clean the commons. Our educatinoal reforms will reduce the time in high school and increase work force participation and re-socialization. I mean financially speaking the practical difference will be an increase in the laboring, working, and lower middle class incomes by something between a third and a half. The thing is we do this without ideology. It’s just ‘science’.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-22 14:15:25 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106624668500961781

  • So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of t

    So any revolution victory requires the satisfaction not of the extremes but of the center. The extremes will take action for ANY improvement, the center will simply not RESIST a substantial improvement. And we are able to provide a substantial improvement for the majority middle. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418208799161257984

  • And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the stat

    And strategically speaking, it’s a very different thing to revolt – sue the state by a common law declaration of reformation or secession – in order to restore the constitution, and overthrow more than a century of pseudoscience sophistry and deceit, than any other justification. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418206287490387968

  • It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constit

    It’s entirely possible – because I’ve (we have) done it – to restore the constitution and reverse the incremental destruction of our civilization by a long stream of sophomoric and pseudoscientific attacks on our western SCIENTIFIC traditions of cooperation and government. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1418205895826231297

  • Enough people are asking for another ‘event’ that I’m at least considering it. A

    Enough people are asking for another ‘event’ that I’m at least considering it. At worst it’s an opportunity to restore the position of P-Law as classical liberal (Anglo Libertarian). And maybe as a personal catharsis, a chance to say I told you so: we have the only solution.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-20 17:22:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1417535351846019078

  • @Zack_Plyler I’m not sure that after the moron-right piled on us that I want to

    @Zack_Plyler I’m not sure that after the moron-right piled on us that I want to invest more in them. I might do an event this fall that again seeks to move the right to a political solution in repetition of the founders – (which is legal) and away from the stupidity they currently practice by allowing the left to bait them into failure.

    But I could be convinced to try if enough people say they’d show.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-07-19 19:52:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/106609006163610958