RT @Turbo_Flux: @TheAutistocrat @EricMorganCoach @WalterIII @curtdoolittle Yes. Was about to add that.
Not all are capable of reciprocity…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 17:24:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628083316841754626
RT @Turbo_Flux: @TheAutistocrat @EricMorganCoach @WalterIII @curtdoolittle Yes. Was about to add that.
Not all are capable of reciprocity…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-21 17:24:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1628083316841754626
Of course. Any ‘monopoly class strategy’ is hostile to western trifunctionalism that facilitates class cooperation thru reciprocity and loyalty.
All jewish and female strategies promote one monopoly or another because of some odd requirement for equality in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 17:53:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627728173604519936
Reply addressees: @CharlesL1902 @juicedavisx @henry4glendale @TheAutistocrat @Imperius__13 @TheTigerBringer @carbonbasedcat @elonmusk @JuiceDavis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627720743864909825
RT @kontherad1: If you do not follow Propertarianism, you are missing out on one of the most sincere movements toward an ethical society in…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 03:03:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627504250531065857
LEARNING NATURAL LAW (P-LAW)
Notes from one of our top team members:
1 – When you first learn about our work, it’s incomprehensible. Like all technical disciplines, the vocabulary, logic, and concepts are alien.
2 – Learning operational prose and e-prime provides the fist simple, yet significant insight into the depth of what we’re doing. Learning the grammars, at least vaguely understanding them, starts to provide understanding.
3 – There is no alternative to the massive amount of reading across the disciplines that’s necessary to understand the work. We cover many disciplines. However, ANY education in economics math or physical science will help you.
4 – The degree of advancement (innovation) in our ‘way of thinking’ is much more than people anticipate. And it’s the equivalent of a university degree worth of work.
5 – The primary obstacle is psychological – some of us just want to know the truth(what’s testifiable) – that’s all. But some have other motives. If you want to justify a prior, or if you have a chip on your shoulder, you may or may not be able to overcome it. Now that I understand this, it’s clear why we have turned over some people who have the talent but move on – they can’t do it.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 20:58:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627412230294626307
Now, that said, I should also say that it’s nearly impossible to defeat P-Law without some sort of very complex sophistry and deceit. So it’s pretty hard for a judge to get away with a bad judgement in court, survive appeals, survive personal prosecution, and survive lifetime…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-17 18:12:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626645768927907868
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1626642840045645825
If you find better work than mine on the truth please tell me.
Tip: you won’t.
See:
Decidability
Truthfulness
Reciprocity
Demonstrated Interest
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-15 20:51:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1625960980738895873
Reply addressees: @GPEditor
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1625956179632422920
I will add something counter-intuitive, and that’s that the protestant faith teaches the bible, and the catholic faith teaches the dogma of what’s roughly, natural law. So there appears to be a superior bias among catholic judges just like a superior bias among protestant politicians and generals. (odd, I know, but worth learning from).
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-12 11:14:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1624728618550132739
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1624725616657420289
Brett,(all)
1. What can we testify to? Realism, Naturalism, Identity, Consistency, Constructability, Correspondence, Rational Choice, Reciprocity, Completeness, Full Accounting and as a consequence Coherence.
2. w/Constructability from irreducible first principles the challenge.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-10 15:47:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1624072660610162692
Reply addressees: @BretWeinstein
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1623746695170502657
(The irony of accusing the guy who solves the scientific method, testimony, reciprocity, universal commensurability, the grammars that result, and a dozen other hard problems, of lacking epistemic rigor)
All logic is falsificationary and forever must be.
Justification=nonsense.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-07 14:54:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1622972037974327304
Reply addressees: @juicedavisx @TheAutistocrat @InternetRadical @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1622911727112454144
I teach this particular methodology and its application to the formal operational logic of the natural law of decidability. I use twitter as the means of teaching those who are intereested, who then migrate to Telegram where Martin Stepan and others continue the work.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-06 00:25:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1622390892622483458
Reply addressees: @10FathomLine @LGClaret
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1622389708906192896