Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • Religion must be compatible with Natural Law or its politics in religious dress,

    Religion must be compatible with Natural Law or its politics in religious dress, not religion.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-22 13:28:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690526459237122049

    Reply addressees: @Heritage

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690524759734378496

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Heritage

    Religious freedom is a fundamental right—a right America has a proud tradition of respecting. https://t.co/KqAXaSreDv

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/690524759734378496

  • @Heritage @kamijane29 —“[heritage is intolerant of other religions]”— Jane,

    @Heritage @kamijane29

    —“[heritage is intolerant of other religions]”—

    Jane,

    Your argument violates the test of reciprocity. Religions must reciprocate tolerance. Atheism and Islam do not.

    One need only demonstrate tolerance under reciprocity.

    In fact, Judaism does not either. Now that I think about it.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-22 09:20:00 UTC

  • NO, RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CANNOT BE A FUNDAMENTAL, NATURAL, RIGHT. (read it) (learn

    NO, RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CANNOT BE A FUNDAMENTAL, NATURAL, RIGHT.

    (read it) (learn it) (share it) (rhetorical weaponry)

    —“Religious freedom is a fundamental right”— The Heritage Foundation

    This cannot logically be true. No fundamental right can exist if it violates natural law.

    Religion must be compatible with Natural Law or it is not religion but politics in religious dress, or warfare in disguise, but not religion.

    If a religion is incompatible with Natural Law, then it is the merger of politics and religion – yet defense of the separation of church and state is the reason for our tolerance of religions.

    So it is a logical contradiction to state that religions that are incompatible with natural law can be claimed a natural right – that is to say there are not natural rights.

    So I have come to disagree with freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Instead: Require Truthful Speech and Truthful Religion: Compatibility with Natural Law.

    Religion remains truthful despite the use myth, parable, allegory, scripture and ritual, as long as it conveys truthful principles by those analogies: compatibility with natural law.

    Christianity is compatible with Natural Law. Poly-moralism and Dualist ethics are not compatible with natural law.

    Christianity advises us how to act in concert with natural law. Islam, Judaism, and a handful of others recommend actions an expressly counter to natural law. And they state that they contain laws – the Talmud and the

    Christians have been tolerant of heresies and competing religions in order to prevent the mandate of a state religion, and therefore to protect natural law, and the independence of religious wisdom based upon natural law from harm by the folly of men.

    Neither Christianity nor Natural Law prohibit us from the expurgation of immoral religions that violate natural law.

    Nor are we prohibited from philosophies that violate natural law: had we defeated marxism-leninism earlier then we would have saved a hundred million souls from suffering.

    We threw Islam out of western europa for its violence and immorality, and failed to throw it out of eastern europa, north Africa, and Byzantium. Look at what our failure wrought wherever we failed.

    We are in the midst of throwing of the second great deceit after the forcible conversion of the romans: the pseudoscientific attempt at western colonization: boazian anthropology, freudian psychology, marxist sociology, cantorian mathematical platonism, marxist-keynesian correlative economics, enlightenment equality, and the philosophical corners of marxist socialism, trotskyist-straussian neo-conservatism, and randian-rothbardian libertinism, and neo-puritanism+postmodern-feminism.

    And we have come into contact with the third wave, this time not by force (islamic conquest), not by religious conversion (jewish christianity), not by pseudoscientific conversion (jewish cosmopolitanism), not by outright deception (postmodernism, feminism, and propaganda).

    We the current conflict is our awakening will to evict this second attempt at colonization of the west, despite our century of tolerance – a tolerance that was abused by everyone we tolerated.

    There are no unlimited general rules. Our delay in discovering the theory of Relativity taught us this. There are no unlimited premises. No infinite deontological theories other than tautologies.

    The limit of religious tolerance is Natural Law.

    Everything else is just another act of war wearing a mask of religion to deceive us by preying upon our altruism.

    We are the people who invented truth. We rescued mankind from ignorance, mysticism, disease, and poverty using our technology of truth: science and natural law.

    We are the only people to have done it.

    They others hate it.

    We must not perish from this earth.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Keiv, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-22 09:04:00 UTC

  • I dunno. Josh and the Nietzscheans kicked my around a bit and I’ve been working

    I dunno. Josh and the Nietzscheans kicked my around a bit and I’ve been working on it, and I can probably get there. Natural Law, the right to demand it, to enforce it, and to make beauty to celebrate one’s victory is enough. I begin to see a sort of way to get there….

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-21 09:46:00 UTC

  • THE SOURCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF NATURAL RIGHTS. All animals that can move seek to

    THE SOURCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF NATURAL RIGHTS.

    All animals that can move seek to acquire.

    What they acquire they treat as their property: they defend it.

    Cooperation is disproportionately rewarding for acquisition.

    But cooperation invites free riding, so we punish free riders (parasites) to preserve the disproportionate rewards of cooperation.

    This is the source of natural law.

    The desire for Liberty competes with the desire for consumption, which competes for the desire for insurance, all of which compete with the desire for dominance or cheating ( free riding/parasitism).

    Hence Liberty is a desire of a minority, security the desire of the majority; and those who desire Liberty and security conspire to control those who wish to live parasitically.

    This is the correct origin of natural law.

    Natural rights are something we often desire.

    So we advertise that we desire them.

    But to exist we must construct them. The only way to construct them is thru exchange of them as mutual guarantee and mutual insurance.

    Attempts to cast rights as existential are attempts to obtain those rights without paying the high cost of them: the reciprocal insurance of others against the abridgment of them by third parties.

    This is correct.

    Libertinism states all of this falsely as an act of fraud: escaping the western traditional contract that only those who will fight to protect property may enter into the agreement for reciprocal grant of insurance.

    That is the full answer Uncolored by the false promise of libertinism.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-20 13:34:00 UTC

  • De Lege Naturae. De artem de testimonium. De philosophiam de aristocratia. De sc

    De Lege Naturae.

    De artem de testimonium.

    De philosophiam de aristocratia.

    De scriptura de Nobilitate.

    Liber Europae Reges Magni

    Viridis Bibliis Arianorum.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-20 12:03:00 UTC

  • capitalism moral? Walter Williams says yes, it is the most moral philosophy mank

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJr2RO7g7jI—-Is capitalism moral? Walter Williams says yes, it is the most moral philosophy mankind has ever pondered! Do you agree?—-

    It is, if:

    (a) it doesn’t occur under a representative government open to special interests that can seek rents, and instead operates by either direct democracy if people are marginally indifferent, or economic democracy if they are substantially different, or by different houses using either direct or economic democracy for diverse polities.

    And (b) if there is rule of law (universal application) whose decidability in law is against parasitism,

    (c) and where there exists universal standing (universal right of suit), so that groups of individuals can punish organizations that engage in parasitism either directly, or via the state.

    Capitalism is moral ( non-parasitic and produces rational, voluntary, cooperation ) if and only if there are no means available FOR IT TO BE USED IMMORALLY.

    There is no common good other than cooperative non parasitism. After that it’s all a matter of market choice in production of consumption or commons.

    Curt Doolittle

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-19 08:54:00 UTC

  • The chinese can lie only because we do not make them put skin in the game. We ig

    The chinese can lie only because we do not make them put skin in the game.

    We ignore the principle of warranty.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-18 10:25:00 UTC

  • OATH “What Is your Oath?” “I shall not steal, by action or inaction, by word or

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/12/24/the-silver-rule-cooperation-the-golden-rule-buying-options-on-cooperation/THE OATH

    “What Is your Oath?”

    “I shall not steal,

    by action or inaction,

    by word or silence,

    by will or weakness.

    I shall speak the truth,

    even if it leads to my death,

    and demand the truth,

    upon pain of death.

    I shall master my will,

    master my body,

    master the truth,

    master a craft,

    and master those

    who have not yet

    done the same.

    I shall never leave

    an enemy unchallenged,

    never flee

    in the face of enemies,

    and never surrender

    to enemies,

    even if it means

    my death.

    I shall prosecute those who steal

    by action or inaction,

    by word or silence,

    by will or weakness.

    I shall fulfill the duties

    of warrior and sheriff,

    of prosecutor and executioner,

    of judge and jury.

    I shall safeguard the helpless,

    assist those in need,

    care for the commons,

    and create beauty in it.

    And I shall leave this world

    for those that have lived in it,

    and those who live in it,

    and those that may yet live,

    a better paradise

    than I entered it.

    I shall make no promise

    that violates this oath,

    and if I break this oath,

    I demand my brothers in oath

    shall kill me without mercy

    and purge my name

    and my memory

    from this earth.

    This is my oath.”

    (all)

    “That is Your Oath, and we shall hold you to it.”

    “Rise a Knight”

    THE SILVER RULE

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/12/24/the-silver-rule-cooperation-the-golden-rule-buying-options-on-cooperation/

    NEVER BEND AT THE KNEE INVOLUNTARILY

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/12/14/never-bend-at-the-knee-involuntarily-ever/

    WILL YOU INSURE YOUR BROTHERS

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/12/14/will-you-insure-your-brothers/

    CLEANSE THE EARTH OF LIES

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/12/07/cleanse-the-earth-of-lies-and-theft-and-we-will-become-the-gods-we-seek/

    (how close is this getting to a religion? a religion of restoration? a religion of conquest?)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-18 05:47:00 UTC

  • Natural law, Common Law, Property Rights. Testimonial Truth. Jury. These are the

    Natural law, Common Law, Property Rights. Testimonial Truth. Jury.

    These are the properties of the discipline of science.

    We did not develop our tradition of natural law because of science.

    We developed science because of our tradition of natural law.

    We did not develop natural law by design.

    We developed it because the voluntary organization of professional warriors in battle required us to.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-17 01:36:00 UTC