If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider. The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend. This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.
Theme: Reciprocity
-
War and Motherhood are Unsubstitutable Goods
If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider. The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend. This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.
-
If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of
If you claim you are unique, and your life unique, and therefore of value out of uniqueness, then defense is not substitutable. Period. That’s the end of the free riding on defense, disaster, emergency services. You either fight, restore, and react, or you are a free rider.
The problem herein is that women cannot fight without causing risk to the men, and risk to generations. A woman’s equivalent of fighting, restoring and reacting is child bearing. If a woman will not bear replacement children and a man will not bear the costs of defense, then they are free riding parasites on those who bear and those who defend.
This is not an opinion. This is merely a fact of physical reality.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-16 09:18:00 UTC
-
NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARR
NO. SCIENCE IS A MORAL DISCIPLINE WITHIN NATURAL LAW: THE MEANS BY WHICH WE WARRANT THE TRUTHFULNESS OF OUR STATEMENTS.
(Ethelbert, Jesus, and Kant say the same thing)
The languages of science(testimony), physical science, propertarianism (social science), natural law (science of dispute resolution), accounting, finance, and economics, (measurement of production), function as the universal language of truth-telling.
The discipline of science asks us to warranty that we have performed due diligence on our statements. We warranty that we have eliminated error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseudoscience, and deceit from our utterances.
That’s what science is:
A NATURAL LAW: a warranty of our information, just like the warranty of our services, just as the warranty of our products, just as the warranty of our speech.
Period. End of story.
I know. You thought you were smart. You were so proud that you had transcended superstition. But it never occurred to you that you were just as ridiculous in the present generation due to the pseudosciences of Marx, Freud, Boaz, Adorno than your superstitious ancestors were in the pseudoscience of theology.
Ok. Have we got that straight? Look in the mirror. Repeat after me: “I was suckered by pseudoscience, just like my ancestors were suckered by superstition. I am a sucker. I pledge not to be a sucker any longer. There is only one moral rule in both silver(negative) and gold (positive) forms: Impose not cost upon the cost born by others, by limiting yourself to actions and words, consisting only of productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, limited to productive externalities.
Ethelbert (Anglo-Saxon Silver Rule), Jesus (Golden-Rule), and Kant (bi-metal rule), all said the same thing. Everything else is lies to justify theft and to circumvent voluntary transfers between individuals classes and groups.
Ok. We’re done here.
“Please stop torturing me with your postmodern superstitions, ok?. Thanks, -The Management.”
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 12:33:00 UTC
-
MYTH, RITUAL, NATURAL LAW: MATURATION VS RELIGION, RITUAL, SUPERNATURAL LAW: INF
MYTH, RITUAL, NATURAL LAW: MATURATION VS RELIGION, RITUAL, SUPERNATURAL LAW: INFANTILIZATION
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-15 09:12:00 UTC
-
LAWS ARE DISCOVERED, LEGISLATION IS MADE. MAN CANNOT MAKE LAW. Humans create com
LAWS ARE DISCOVERED, LEGISLATION IS MADE. MAN CANNOT MAKE LAW.
Humans create commands, legislation, and regulations. Laws, both physical and natural (cooperation), we can only discover. We cannot any more create a law of cooperation (natural law) than we can a law of nature (physical laws). The only difference between physical laws and natural laws is that since we have memories, we can cooperate across time rather than be limited to the moment of the difference in potential.
(That might be hard to catch without pondering a bit.)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 22:38:00 UTC
-
So Natural Law provides decidability, and it is both moral and true. But moral a
So Natural Law provides decidability, and it is both moral and true. But moral arguments alone provide no decidability alone.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:09:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797124015957667842
Reply addressees: @carson_gross
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769
-
So technically speaking, moral rules provide no method of decidability, but we c
So technically speaking, moral rules provide no method of decidability, but we can state that natural law is decid. and moral.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 17:08:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797123781399547905
Reply addressees: @carson_gross
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797122438857248769
-
If you can grok this: moral arguments are attempts at theft or theft prevention.
If you can grok this: moral arguments are attempts at theft or theft prevention. Only trades are moral. There are no moral arguments.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 16:53:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/797120154308120576
-
If you can grok this: moral arguments are attempts at theft or theft prevention.
If you can grok this: moral arguments are attempts at theft or theft prevention. Only trades are moral. There are no moral arguments.
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-11 11:53:00 UTC