If you advocate reciprocity under rule of law you MUST end up with moral capitalism. If you advocate capitalism in and of itself you will end up with immoral capitalism.
The greatest trick the devil every played was convincing us he didn’t exist?
The greatest trick in antiquity was convincing us that gods exist. There are no gods(goods) among us, but devils(evils) are everywhere.
The greatest trick in modernity is convincing us that the argument is to ends (capitalism vs socialism) rather than means (discretionary rule vs rule of law).
By selling ends rather than means they circumvent the problem of means: there are no gods, there are an infinite number of possible devils, and rule of law prohibits devils and leaves room for the goods to flower.
Capitalism results from the suppression of all parasitism under the rule of natural law of reciprocity.
Moral Capitalism is the result of rule of law. Immoral (Ghetto) capitalism is the result of arbitrary rule, by alternatives to reciprocity.
All alternatives to natural law of reciprocity, including the NAP, are nothing but attempts to propose an alternative to reciprocity, and therefore create immoral capitalism – (ghetto capitalism).
Hayek was right.
The natural law of reciprocity, the common law of torts, and the militia are the source of moral trade. The moment we talk about anything other than rule of law, and even mention capitalism, we are in fact engaging in an attempt at ghetto ethics and we pay the price of ghetto ethics: the destruction of rule of law.
And Rothbard’s ghetto ethics yields ghetto capitalism, and it is the entire world that rails against ghetto capitalism. Yet on balance, it is ghetto capitalism that we practice today. Ever since Disraeli converted the british empire from a moral one under rule of law to a financial one under capitalism – and then america picked up the remains.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine.
Theme: Reciprocity
-
ARISTOCRATIC CAPITALISM VS GHETTO CAPITALISM If you advocate reciprocity under r
ARISTOCRATIC CAPITALISM VS GHETTO CAPITALISM
If you advocate reciprocity under rule of law you MUST end up with moral capitalism. If you advocate capitalism in and of itself you will end up with immoral capitalism.
The greatest trick the devil every played was convincing us he didn’t exist?
The greatest trick in antiquity was convincing us that gods exist. There are no gods(goods) among us, but devils(evils) are everywhere.
The greatest trick in modernity is convincing us that the argument is to ends (capitalism vs socialism) rather than means (discretionary rule vs rule of law).
By selling ends rather than means they circumvent the problem of means: there are no gods, there are an infinite number of possible devils, and rule of law prohibits devils and leaves room for the goods to flower.
Capitalism results from the suppression of all parasitism under the rule of natural law of reciprocity.
Moral Capitalism is the result of rule of law. Immoral (Ghetto) capitalism is the result of arbitrary rule, by alternatives to reciprocity.
All alternatives to natural law of reciprocity, including the NAP, are nothing but attempts to propose an alternative to reciprocity, and therefore create immoral capitalism – (ghetto capitalism).
Hayek was right.
The natural law of reciprocity, the common law of torts, and the militia are the source of moral trade. The moment we talk about anything other than rule of law, and even mention capitalism, we are in fact engaging in an attempt at ghetto ethics and we pay the price of ghetto ethics: the destruction of rule of law.
And Rothbard’s ghetto ethics yields ghetto capitalism, and it is the entire world that rails against ghetto capitalism. Yet on balance, it is ghetto capitalism that we practice today. Ever since Disraeli converted the british empire from a moral one under rule of law to a financial one under capitalism – and then america picked up the remains.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-13 08:31:00 UTC
-
Aristocratic Capitalism Vs Ghetto Capitalism
If you advocate reciprocity under rule of law you MUST end up with moral capitalism. If you advocate capitalism in and of itself you will end up with immoral capitalism. The greatest trick the devil every played was convincing us he didn’t exist? The greatest trick in antiquity was convincing us that gods exist. There are no gods(goods) among us, but devils(evils) are everywhere. The greatest trick in modernity is convincing us that the argument is to ends (capitalism vs socialism) rather than means (discretionary rule vs rule of law). By selling ends rather than means they circumvent the problem of means: there are no gods, there are an infinite number of possible devils, and rule of law prohibits devils and leaves room for the goods to flower. Capitalism results from the suppression of all parasitism under the rule of natural law of reciprocity. Moral Capitalism is the result of rule of law. Immoral (Ghetto) capitalism is the result of arbitrary rule, by alternatives to reciprocity. All alternatives to natural law of reciprocity, including the NAP, are nothing but attempts to propose an alternative to reciprocity, and therefore create immoral capitalism – (ghetto capitalism). Hayek was right. The natural law of reciprocity, the common law of torts, and the militia are the source of moral trade. The moment we talk about anything other than rule of law, and even mention capitalism, we are in fact engaging in an attempt at ghetto ethics and we pay the price of ghetto ethics: the destruction of rule of law. And Rothbard’s ghetto ethics yields ghetto capitalism, and it is the entire world that rails against ghetto capitalism. Yet on balance, it is ghetto capitalism that we practice today. Ever since Disraeli converted the british empire from a moral one under rule of law to a financial one under capitalism – and then america picked up the remains. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine. -
You Can’t Get Around Reciprocity. Politics Is Solved.
I mean, you can’t get around reciprocity as the measure of morality. You can’t get around property in toto as the test and limit of reciprocity. You can’t get around natural law of reciprocity as the means of dispute resolution. You can’t get around markets under natural law of reciprocity. You can’t get around the fact that goods services and information can be used to conduct thefts directly, indirectly, and by externality. You can’t get around the fact that you can only warranty what you can perform restitution for, and therefore what you can warranty limits the goods, services, and information that you can bring to market. You can’t get around the fact that even proposing an alternative to a market order is something you cannot warranty, and something that is de facto an attempted theft. You can’t get around the fact that no matter what order you want to produce can be produced through exchange. What you can’t get around and none of us can get around, is that the least able have behavior to trade – what they may not do, and the most able have talents to trade – what they may do. You can’t get around these things. Ever. As far as I know political science is solved. It will just require us to suppress parasitism in this world by political means the same way we have suppressed parasitism by violence, theft, fraud in goods and services. And the principle means of doing so is suppression of advocacy of parasitism by information. And to do that requires only that we publish the requirements for reciprocity in all speech. And it turns out, that is possible, and not all that difficult. -
YOU CAN’T GET AROUND RECIPROCITY. POLITICS IS SOLVED. I mean, you can’t get arou
YOU CAN’T GET AROUND RECIPROCITY. POLITICS IS SOLVED.
I mean, you can’t get around reciprocity as the measure of morality. You can’t get around property in toto as the test and limit of reciprocity. You can’t get around natural law of reciprocity as the means of dispute resolution. You can’t get around markets under natural law of reciprocity. You can’t get around the fact that goods services and information can be used to conduct thefts directly, indirectly, and by externality. You can’t get around the fact that you can only warranty what you can perform restitution for, and therefore what you can warranty limits the goods, services, and information that you can bring to market. You can’t get around the fact that even proposing an alternative to a market order is something you cannot warranty, and something that is de facto an attempted theft. You can’t get around the fact that no matter what order you want to produce can be produced through exchange. What you can’t get around and none of us can get around, is that the least able have behavior to trade – what they may not do, and the most able have talents to trade – what they may do. You can’t get around these things. Ever. As far as I know political science is solved. It will just require us to suppress parasitism in this world by political means the same way we have suppressed parasitism by violence, theft, fraud in goods and services. And the principle means of doing so is suppression of advocacy of parasitism by information. And to do that requires only that we publish the requirements for reciprocity in all speech. And it turns out, that is possible, and not all that difficult.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 21:34:00 UTC
-
You Can’t Get Around Reciprocity. Politics Is Solved.
I mean, you can’t get around reciprocity as the measure of morality. You can’t get around property in toto as the test and limit of reciprocity. You can’t get around natural law of reciprocity as the means of dispute resolution. You can’t get around markets under natural law of reciprocity. You can’t get around the fact that goods services and information can be used to conduct thefts directly, indirectly, and by externality. You can’t get around the fact that you can only warranty what you can perform restitution for, and therefore what you can warranty limits the goods, services, and information that you can bring to market. You can’t get around the fact that even proposing an alternative to a market order is something you cannot warranty, and something that is de facto an attempted theft. You can’t get around the fact that no matter what order you want to produce can be produced through exchange. What you can’t get around and none of us can get around, is that the least able have behavior to trade – what they may not do, and the most able have talents to trade – what they may do. You can’t get around these things. Ever. As far as I know political science is solved. It will just require us to suppress parasitism in this world by political means the same way we have suppressed parasitism by violence, theft, fraud in goods and services. And the principle means of doing so is suppression of advocacy of parasitism by information. And to do that requires only that we publish the requirements for reciprocity in all speech. And it turns out, that is possible, and not all that difficult. -
What Does “Market Fascism” Mean?
WHAT DOES “MARKET FASCISM” MEAN? It means nothing other than the prohibition on any alternative to voluntary and reciprocal orders, because even advocacy of an alternative is to engage in conspiracy to commit theft. Militia > Sovereignty > Rule of Law > Markets In Everything -
WHAT DOES “MARKET FASCISM” MEAN? It means nothing other than the prohibition on
WHAT DOES “MARKET FASCISM” MEAN?
It means nothing other than the prohibition on any alternative to voluntary and reciprocal orders, because even advocacy of an alternative is to engage in conspiracy to commit theft.
Militia > Sovereignty > Rule of Law > Markets In Everything
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 21:25:00 UTC
-
What Does “Market Fascism” Mean?
WHAT DOES “MARKET FASCISM” MEAN? It means nothing other than the prohibition on any alternative to voluntary and reciprocal orders, because even advocacy of an alternative is to engage in conspiracy to commit theft. Militia > Sovereignty > Rule of Law > Markets In Everything -
“Market Fascism” Provides the only sovereignty. Rule of Natural Law of Reciproci
“Market Fascism” Provides the only sovereignty. Rule of Natural Law of Reciprocity, Judiciary, Militia, Monarchy. Everyone else just rides on the market, and that market pays for all of the above.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-12 21:08:00 UTC