Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • A judge of natural law does not depend upon the comprehension of the judged, any

    A judge of natural law does not depend upon the comprehension of the judged, any more than a mathematician on the comprehension of the audience.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:08:00 UTC

  • Understanding is overrated, and volition over-estimated. I don’t expect people t

    Understanding is overrated, and volition over-estimated. I don’t expect people to understand. I only expect them to obey natural law or bear the painful consequences.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:04:00 UTC

  • IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law

    IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH

    Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Violence > Markets > Non Parasitic Order.

    You must make an oath to produce reciprocity; if you produce reciprocity you will as a consequence produce sovereignty; if you produce sovereignty, decisions are only decidable by natural law, and only enforceable by violence – the sum total of which results in markets, and because of markets, the result is a non-parasitic order.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 10:37:00 UTC

  • International trade is almost entirely capitalist, and reciprocal – they have no

    International trade is almost entirely capitalist, and reciprocal – they have no choice.

    Contrary to propaganda, all states are largely social democratic – they have no choice.

    Contrary to image, businesses are largely socialist internally – they have no choice.

    As expected, all families are communist – they have no choice.

    Because each demands what is necessary to maintain the balance between available information, possible incentives, probable means and desired ends.

    However when we try to misapply decidability from one condition to the other, we do so in opposition to the available information, available incentives, possible means, and desired ends.

    This is not alterable.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 09:29:00 UTC

  • The Law of Policy

    Whenever political decidability is no longer empirical it must of necessity rely on ideology, because empiricism tests reciprocity(equilibrium), and ideology tests extremes(disequilibrium). Ergo, either one lives by rule of law, markets, empiricism, and equilibrium, or one lives by rule by discretion, bureaucracy, ideology, and disequilibrium. At present our compromise solution is discretion from the use of proceeds of cooperation (taxation), and rule of law (non discretion) for all activity. But without nationalism we cannot test nor preserve reciprocity between groups with heterogeneous demands due to heterogeneous distributions. Apr 18, 2018 7:50am

  • The Law of Policy

    Whenever political decidability is no longer empirical it must of necessity rely on ideology, because empiricism tests reciprocity(equilibrium), and ideology tests extremes(disequilibrium). Ergo, either one lives by rule of law, markets, empiricism, and equilibrium, or one lives by rule by discretion, bureaucracy, ideology, and disequilibrium. At present our compromise solution is discretion from the use of proceeds of cooperation (taxation), and rule of law (non discretion) for all activity. But without nationalism we cannot test nor preserve reciprocity between groups with heterogeneous demands due to heterogeneous distributions. Apr 18, 2018 7:50am

  • Propertarianism Isn’t Anti Anyone.

    Propertarianism doesn’t tell people they’re ‘bad’, only that they’re doing what they must. Propertarianism only tells us that the only solution to conflict is to pay the underclasses to protect markets by limiting or eliminate there reproduction and the profound costs they and their descendents place on others. It’s the cheapest investment with the highest returns we can make.

  • Propertarianism Isn’t Anti Anyone.

    Propertarianism doesn’t tell people they’re ‘bad’, only that they’re doing what they must. Propertarianism only tells us that the only solution to conflict is to pay the underclasses to protect markets by limiting or eliminate there reproduction and the profound costs they and their descendents place on others. It’s the cheapest investment with the highest returns we can make.

  • POLYLOGICAL ETHICS and PILPUL (Justificationism), using appeals to MORAL EQUITY

    POLYLOGICAL ETHICS and PILPUL (Justificationism), using appeals to MORAL EQUITY (reasonableness). Once you (a) understand the technique, and (b) understand high trust peoples alone are vulnerable to it, then (c) our high trust culture is an economic blessing and a genetic curse.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 13:22:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986595821851377665

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986594991903358977

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/986594991903358977

  • PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T ANTI ANYONE. Propertarianism doesn’t tell people they’re ‘

    PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T ANTI ANYONE.

    Propertarianism doesn’t tell people they’re ‘bad’, only that they’re doing what they must. Propertarianism only tells us that the only solution to conflict is to pay the underclasses to protect markets by limiting or eliminate there reproduction and the profound costs they and their descendents place on others. It’s the cheapest investment with the highest returns we can make.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 13:05:00 UTC