—“Pardon my ignorance but what is White Sharia (“The White Law”)?”— Its a neologism for an intolerant, absolutist, expansionist, prosecutorial law of truth, duty, reciprocity, and nationalism. “The law beyond which no religion, state, academy, organization, or individual may tread.” (“Noose, Pike, and Pyre”)
Theme: Reciprocity
-
–“What Is White Sharia (“The White Law”)?”00
—“Pardon my ignorance but what is White Sharia (“The White Law”)?”— Its a neologism for an intolerant, absolutist, expansionist, prosecutorial law of truth, duty, reciprocity, and nationalism. “The law beyond which no religion, state, academy, organization, or individual may tread.” (“Noose, Pike, and Pyre”)
-
Originalism and Textualism
Originalism requires that the legislature alter the law and that the court not alter the law, only reject bad law. The constitution was an attempt to codify natural law (reciprocity). Our law is natural law and has been for 3500 years. The weakness in our system of government is: 1) There is no requirement that a law pass the court before it’s enacted. 2) There is no way for the court to compel the state to repair a law other than to invalidate a provision or all of it. 3) Statement of natural law of reciprocity, Originalism, Textualism, and Strict Construction from natural law of reciprocity were not stated as part of the document. Law can and must be algorithmic
-
Originalism and Textualism
Originalism requires that the legislature alter the law and that the court not alter the law, only reject bad law. The constitution was an attempt to codify natural law (reciprocity). Our law is natural law and has been for 3500 years. The weakness in our system of government is: 1) There is no requirement that a law pass the court before it’s enacted. 2) There is no way for the court to compel the state to repair a law other than to invalidate a provision or all of it. 3) Statement of natural law of reciprocity, Originalism, Textualism, and Strict Construction from natural law of reciprocity were not stated as part of the document. Law can and must be algorithmic
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. TERRITORIAL PROPERTY REQUIRES CAPITAL IMPROVE
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
TERRITORIAL PROPERTY REQUIRES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
As I’ve argued in my “Ancestral Lands” video, Lands belongs to those who improve it (invest in it), not those who merely make use of it – that’s true of all property. Possession is just possession. Property is the result of transformation (investment).
Typically (historically) monuments and physical infrastructure determine ownership (property).
It’s not clear why Boer conquest of SA territory is different from Bantu conquest of Khoi and San territory – except that the investment has been profoundly more effective – there wasn’t any before the Boers. None.
It’s not clear that the slaughter of south african whites is anything more than a repetition of the past slaughter of african tribes by one another.
My prescription is that if there is evidence of fighting, the separation is the only solution.
I would prefer africa for africans and europe for europeans at least until we are at demographic, social and economic parity. But some people want globalization where none of us is safe from competitors.
There is a minimum difference in distribution of ability, knowledge and custom that is necessary for peaceful cooperation. Beyond that, then one group must oppress or kill the other.
And that is the worst of all possible solutions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 22:26:48 UTC
-
“Pardon my ignorance but what is white sharia?”— Its a neologism for an intole
—“Pardon my ignorance but what is white sharia?”—
Its a neologism for an intolerant, absolutist, expansionist, prosecutorial law of truth, duty, reciprocity, and nationalism.
“The law beyond which no religion, state, academy, organization, or individual may tread.”
(“Noose, Pike, and Pyre”)
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 20:06:00 UTC
-
TERRITORIAL PROPERTY REQUIRES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS As I’ve argued in my “Ancestr
TERRITORIAL PROPERTY REQUIRES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
As I’ve argued in my “Ancestral Lands” video, Lands belongs to those who improve it (invest in it), not those who merely make use of it – that’s true of all property. Possession is just possession. Property is the result of transformation (investment).
Typically (historically) monuments and physical infrastructure determine ownership (property).
It’s not clear why Boer conquest of SA territory is different from Bantu conquest of Khoi and San territory – except that the investment has been profoundly more effective – there wasn’t any before the Boers. None.
It’s not clear that the slaughter of south african whites is anything more than a repetition of the past slaughter of african tribes by one another.
My prescription is that if there is evidence of fighting, the separation is the only solution.
I would prefer africa for africans and europe for europeans at least until we are at demographic, social and economic parity. But some people want globalization where none of us is safe from competitors.
There is a minimum difference in distribution of ability, knowledge and custom that is necessary for peaceful cooperation. Beyond that, then one group must oppress or kill the other.
And that is the worst of all possible solutions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-10 18:26:00 UTC
-
Territorial Property Requires Capital Improvements
As I’ve argued in my “Ancestral Lands” video, Lands belongs to those who improve it (invest in it), not those who merely make use of it – that’s true of all property. Possession is just possession. Property is the result of transformation (investment). Typically (historically) monuments and physical infrastructure determine ownership (property). It’s not clear why Boer conquest of SA territory is different from Bantu conquest of Khoi and San territory – except that the investment has been profoundly more effective – there wasn’t any before the Boers. None. It’s not clear that the slaughter of south african whites is anything more than a repetition of the past slaughter of african tribes by one another. My prescription is that if there is evidence of fighting, the separation is the only solution. I would prefer africa for africans and europe for europeans at least until we are at demographic, social and economic parity. But some people want globalization where none of us is safe from competitors. There is a minimum difference in distribution of ability, knowledge and custom that is necessary for peaceful cooperation. Beyond that, then one group must oppress or kill the other. And that is the worst of all possible solutions.
-
Territorial Property Requires Capital Improvements
As I’ve argued in my “Ancestral Lands” video, Lands belongs to those who improve it (invest in it), not those who merely make use of it – that’s true of all property. Possession is just possession. Property is the result of transformation (investment). Typically (historically) monuments and physical infrastructure determine ownership (property). It’s not clear why Boer conquest of SA territory is different from Bantu conquest of Khoi and San territory – except that the investment has been profoundly more effective – there wasn’t any before the Boers. None. It’s not clear that the slaughter of south african whites is anything more than a repetition of the past slaughter of african tribes by one another. My prescription is that if there is evidence of fighting, the separation is the only solution. I would prefer africa for africans and europe for europeans at least until we are at demographic, social and economic parity. But some people want globalization where none of us is safe from competitors. There is a minimum difference in distribution of ability, knowledge and custom that is necessary for peaceful cooperation. Beyond that, then one group must oppress or kill the other. And that is the worst of all possible solutions.
-
Rule of The Sovereign
If the Truth is not enough, and therefore law is not enough, then you are weak, and lack the agency necessary for demands of reciprocity between sovereigns. As such you may not rule, or govern, and may have only liberty(capital), freedom(property), and subsidy(insurance), by permission, as the sovereign see fit. And you may purchase liberty, freedom, subsidy, and defense under the natural law of sovereigns, by acts of and military and civic defense of the commons, civil contribution by payment of fees, and the reciprocal defense of the subsidy, property, and liberty of peers.