Theme: Reciprocity

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. LEGAL DIFFERENCES Ashkenazi Volition independ

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    LEGAL DIFFERENCES
    Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities.
    -vs-
    Western Reciprocity inclusive of externalities.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 20:26:25 UTC

  • Do Natural Rights Exist? No. but We Can Create Them

    1 – There exists a natural law (necessity), and that is non-imposition (reciprocity, sovereignty). We do not have a choice in this. It is the product of physical universe, and the necessity of a species capable of the pursuit of self interest as well as cooperation in that self interest. 2 – That necessity of natural law can be expressed positively (usefully) as a collection of rights of appeal to a court (insurer) of natural law (reciprocity, sovereignty). 3 – In that sense, we can attempt to violate natural law, or we can attempt to construct natural rights (defenses of reciprocity). While courts of the common (natural) law of tort attempt to construct natural rights under rule of law, the state attempts (constantly) to violate that natural law by the construction of legislation that violates the natural law of reciprocity. 4 – Natural rights do not exist, but instead, natural rights (specific insurances of sovereignty) are something we can seek to create through legislation (contract), that is then enforced by the courts (insurer). 5 – Natural Rights are not something that exists without our creation of them under the natural law of non-imposition, reciprocity, sovereignty. The are merely something we desire to produce within the natural law of reciprocity, as specific guarantees of those instances of property: life, liberty, property, and interests in the multitude of physical, normative, traditional, and institutional commons.

  • Do Natural Rights Exist? No. but We Can Create Them

    1 – There exists a natural law (necessity), and that is non-imposition (reciprocity, sovereignty). We do not have a choice in this. It is the product of physical universe, and the necessity of a species capable of the pursuit of self interest as well as cooperation in that self interest. 2 – That necessity of natural law can be expressed positively (usefully) as a collection of rights of appeal to a court (insurer) of natural law (reciprocity, sovereignty). 3 – In that sense, we can attempt to violate natural law, or we can attempt to construct natural rights (defenses of reciprocity). While courts of the common (natural) law of tort attempt to construct natural rights under rule of law, the state attempts (constantly) to violate that natural law by the construction of legislation that violates the natural law of reciprocity. 4 – Natural rights do not exist, but instead, natural rights (specific insurances of sovereignty) are something we can seek to create through legislation (contract), that is then enforced by the courts (insurer). 5 – Natural Rights are not something that exists without our creation of them under the natural law of non-imposition, reciprocity, sovereignty. The are merely something we desire to produce within the natural law of reciprocity, as specific guarantees of those instances of property: life, liberty, property, and interests in the multitude of physical, normative, traditional, and institutional commons.

  • “The problem with “out of the box” (straight from the dealer, no options) Wester

    —“The problem with “out of the box” (straight from the dealer, no options) Western Reciprocity Inclusive of Externalities (WRIE), is it needs a dual-morality (in group / out group) module otherwise the range of agency is too narrow (self limited).”—James Santagata


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 17:45:00 UTC

  • LEGAL DIFFERENCES Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities. -vs- Western

    LEGAL DIFFERENCES

    Ashkenazi Volition independent of externalities.

    -vs-

    Western Reciprocity inclusive of externalities.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 16:26:00 UTC

  • “To construct a right requires a contract (exchange of rights and obligations un

    —“To construct a right requires a contract (exchange of rights and obligations under reciprocity), a means of deciding if a right has been violated (natural law) and an ability to provide restitution if they have been violated (insurer).”—Andy Lunn


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 16:13:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1023602548320690176

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“To construct a right requires a contract

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“To construct a right requires a contract (exchange of rights and obligations under reciprocity), a means of deciding if a right has been violated (natural law) and an ability to provide restitution if they have been violated (insurer).”—Andy Lunn


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 16:13:49 UTC

  • SHARING MATTERS. I don’t promote. Everything we do is through word of mouth. And

    SHARING MATTERS. I don’t promote. Everything we do is through word of mouth. And you are the means by which we introduce others to truth, natural law and an institutional solution to our conflict. -Thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:11:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1023586860340310016

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. SHARING MATTERS. I don’t promote. Everything

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    SHARING MATTERS. I don’t promote. Everything we do is through word of mouth. And you are the means by which we introduce others to truth, natural law and an institutional solution to our conflict. -Thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 15:11:28 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. DO NATURAL RIGHTS EXIST? NO. BUT WE CAN CREAT

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    DO NATURAL RIGHTS EXIST? NO. BUT WE CAN CREATE THEM

    1 – There exists a natural law (necessity), and that is non-imposition (reciprocity, sovereignty). We do not have a choice in this. It is the product of physical universe, and the necessity of a species capable of the pursuit of self interest as well as cooperation in that self interest.

    2 – That necessity of natural law can be expressed positively (usefully) as a collection of rights of appeal to a court (insurer) of natural law (reciprocity, sovereignty).

    3 – In that sense, we can attempt to violate natural law, or we can attempt to construct natural rights (defenses of reciprocity). While courts of the common (natural) law of tort attempt to construct natural rights under rule of law, the state attempts (constantly) to violate that natural law by the construction of legislation that violates the natural law of reciprocity.

    4 – Natural rights do not exist, but instead, natural rights (specific insurances of sovereignty) are something we can seek to create through legislation (contract), that is then enforced by the courts (insurer).

    5 – Natural Rights are not something that exists without our creation of them under the natural law of non-imposition, reciprocity, sovereignty. The are merely something we desire to produce within the natural law of reciprocity, as specific guarantees of those instances of property: life, liberty, property, and interests in the multitude of physical, normative, traditional, and institutional commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 14:50:32 UTC