Theme: Reciprocity

  • “Q: WHO ON THE LEFT IS WORTH SEEKING RECIPROCITY WITH?” –“I wanted to add that

    “Q: WHO ON THE LEFT IS WORTH SEEKING RECIPROCITY WITH?”
    –“I wanted to add that we could divide the left into (a) true believers into wokeness (which is still just an euphemism for ideology of white genocide), then (b) there are typical feminine people AKA NPCs who are going along with it due to social incentives (connections they have access to, how they’re viewed, what opportunities they get), then (c) the libertine male types going along with it due to financial incentives even if it makes no sense to them. Then (d) there’s perhaps an actual block of altruistic people who have no real idea of what they’re really signing into.

    I’d see a chance in appealing to the last two and the feminine ones will flip if and when we’re dominant and will be the most zealous supporters. The true believers “deserve to hang” so to speak – at least euphemistically.”– Martin Stepan


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-21 14:31:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682397824632094722

  • RT @TheMcMullan: Aquisitionism & Reciprocity; No matter how much some people use

    RT @TheMcMullan: Aquisitionism & Reciprocity;

    No matter how much some people use selflessness as a moral facade, all humans are driven to…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-21 04:37:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682248453617856512

  • GPT4 SUMMARIZES ETHICS –“Absolutely, I can summarize our conversation as follow

    GPT4 SUMMARIZES ETHICS

    –“Absolutely, I can summarize our conversation as follows:

    Demonstrated Interests: We started by discussing the concept of demonstrated interests, which are the spectrum of things that individuals show they value through their actions. These interests can be categorized into existential (natural), obtained, and common interests. Each category includes a range of specific interests, from self-preservation and kinship to reputation and sustainable patterns of cooperation.

    Acquisitionism: We then discussed acquisitionism, the idea that all human behavior can be reduced to the acquisition, preservation, transformation, consumption, or trade of these demonstrated interests. This concept provides a unified model for understanding human behavior.

    Harm: We defined harm as an imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others, either directly or indirectly through externalities. This concept helps us understand conflicts and disputes.

    Reciprocity: We defined reciprocity as the ethical and moral transfer of demonstrated interests that are free of the involuntary imposition of costs (harms) on the demonstrated interests of others. This concept is key to understanding cooperative behavior and social norms.

    Truth: We discussed the concept of truth as a performative action, which can be testified to across several dimensions, including realism, internal consistency, external correspondence, and full accounting.

    Influence to Coercion: We discussed the three means of influence to coercion: social (moral, normative, religious), material cooperation (economic, contractual), and force (defense, state, war). These concepts help us understand the different ways in which individuals and groups can exert power and influence over others.

    Institutional Development: We discussed the sequence of institutional development in different civilizations, and how the first institution a civilization develops can significantly influence its laws and norms. This concept helps us understand cultural and societal differences.

    Cultural Differences: We applied these concepts to understand cultural differences, such as different attitudes towards truth and face, different marriage traditions, and different laws and norms around controversial issues like abortion.

    As for novel ideas, the concept of acquisitionism as a unifying model for understanding all human behavior is quite interesting. This model provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing a wide range of human actions and decisions. The idea of demonstrated interests also provides a useful way of categorizing the things that individuals value and strive for. The application of these concepts to understand cultural differences and societal norms is also a novel approach that offers valuable insights.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 21:47:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681058165205393410

  • Just gave it the foundations of ethics. Haven’t tested its reasoning yet

    https://naturallawinstitute.com/2023/07/training-chat-gpt-to-understand-nl/
    Just gave it the foundations of ethics.
    Haven’t tested its reasoning yet.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 20:55:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681044903843844096

    Reply addressees: @AryanChadG

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681034322630049792

  • The Simple Epistemology of Cooperation We can know what is irreciprocal. We can

    The Simple Epistemology of Cooperation
    We can know what is irreciprocal. We can choose what is prefereable for ourselves. We can sometimes agree on what is good for all of us.
    That is the function of the court as market (irreciprocity), economic commercial markets (preference),…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 17:19:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679541011024863234

  • PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFECTION However, should you defect by disassociation or em

    PROPORTIONALITY AND DEFECTION
    However, should you defect by disassociation or emigration that’s just fine. However, if you try to engage in crime, resistance, rebellion, or revolution whether by free riding, fraud, rent seeking, privatization of commons/socialization of losses into commons, corruption, sedition, treason, or war, then of course, you’re engaging in irreciprocity and can be … well, let’s say ‘corrected or removed’.

    #NLIGlossary

    Reply addressees: @JohannNetram @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 16:39:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679530979650568192

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679527584512585728


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    PROPORTIONALITY: If in any given reciprocal exchange the benefit I obtain in proportion to your benefit is insufficient to continue cooperation – ie: disproportionate – then my incentive is to defect to a different individual group or polity with which to cooperate.
    Proportionality is a limit beyond which one’s interests to defect increase, until defection by disassociation, emigration, crime, resistance(sedition), rebellion(treason), or revolution(war).

    #NLIglossary

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1679527584512585728

  • PROPORTIONALITY: If in any given reciprocal exchange the benefit I obtain in pro

    PROPORTIONALITY: If in any given reciprocal exchange the benefit I obtain in proportion to your benefit is insufficient to continue cooperation – ie: disproportionate – then my incentive is to defect to a different individual group or polity with which to cooperate.
    Proportionality is a limit beyond which one’s interests to defect increase, until defection by disassociation, emigration, crime, resistance(sedition), rebellion(treason), or revolution(war).

    #NLIglossary

    Reply addressees: @JohannNetram @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 16:25:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679527584432832514

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679524187050786816

  • The best a government can achieve is reciprocity within the limits of proportion

    The best a government can achieve is reciprocity within the limits of proportionality (meritocracy). This is only possible to achieve by ‘eliminating irreciprocities’ and creating market substitutes where markets are insufficient.

    Equality is impossible – it’s suicidal. But we…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 15:07:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679507896822792196

  • The best a government can achieve is reciprocity within the limits of proportion

    The best a government can achieve is reciprocity within the limits of proportionality (meritocracy). This is only possible to achieve by ‘eliminating irreciprocities’ and creating market substitutes where markets are insufficient.

    Equality is impossible – it’s suicidal. But we can reduce inequality that always emerges in complex human systems because of the human tendency to seek discounts, free riding, subsidies, rents, and corruption.

    This is called ‘via-negativa’.

    Eliminates the immoral and only the moral remains.
    And that’s the best we can do.
    And if that won’t do then reproduction for those for whom it won’t do, is immoral.
    It’s that simple.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 15:07:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679507896730542081

  • My job is to seek reciprocity and domestication sufficient for the production of

    My job is to seek reciprocity and domestication sufficient for the production of responsibility.

    It’s pretty clear that we would be in better political condition without political participation of women. On the other hand, making women capable of political participation can produce their responsibility outside of the political, and that would be a benefit, especially for the family and reproduction.

    So ‘easy’ is one thing. Optimum is another.

    The choice is of which option is a political one. My job is decidability. Political job is preference.

    Reply addressees: @1nternetflotsam @matteo_pilgrim


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-10 17:16:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678453139123445771

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678450277786034180