September 18th, 2018 3:12 PM FASCIST? I’M A FASCIST? [Y]eah. So… Truth, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Markets that produce prosperity, Family as the central object of policy, paying the underclass not to breed, direct redistribution of liquidity and the polity’s dividends, ending all rent seeking and parasitism both political, financial, and commercial. Exclusionary Nationalism as a means of increasing tolerance for inter-class redistribution, increasing the opportunity for local status attainment; producing commons suitable to the demographics; reducing all possible costs of mutual cooperation and invention; public-private investment in technological, industrial, and commercial innovation. And total suppression of political warfare to impose any alternative. Yeah. Well, that’s my version of Natural Law and it looks a whole lot like NATIONAL SOCIALISM without the silly mustache. So yeah. In the sense that fascism refers to zero tolerance for opposition to all of the above, I’m definitely a fascist. And if you aren’t also then you have no idea what you’re saying other than advocating for free riding, parasitism and predation upon others. So the question is, if you’re not the same kind of fascist, then you’re by definition an unethical and immoral enemy of not only me and mine but all mankind.
Theme: Reciprocity
-
Is There a Place for The Left?
September 18th, 2018 12:18 PM IS THERE A PLACE FOR THE LEFT?
—“Under your natural law, Is there a place for the left?”—
[T]here is a place for EXCHANGE between anyone, but predation and parasitism by no one. It’s not true that left wingers invent more than right. It’s true that leftists and rightists innovate in different areas: left consumption and release of normative constraint vs right order and release of existential constraints. I mean, I have absurd orderliness, and I still was voted most likely to succeed as a practicing artist by the faculty two years in a row. creativity occurs across the spectrum, but it’s creativity in WHAT? There is a place for everyone, there is just no place for parasitism and the left innovates means of parasitism and consumption to obtain its freedom from the right, and the right innovations suppression of parasitism and consumption in order to obtain its freedom from the left. The left and the feminine mind it evolved from cannot compete so it engages in rents, parasitism and predation to obtain what they see as proportionality independent of merit, and what we see as proportionality by merit. They have lower agency. They are not fully human. And this is why we must separate if possible, so that we can continue to speciate by proportionality: whether equalitarian and irreciprocal, or meritocratic and reciprocal. REVOLT, SEPARATE, PROSPER, SPECIATE. They will devolve and we will evolve and leave them behind.
-
Fascist? I’m a Fascist?
September 18th, 2018 3:12 PM FASCIST? I’M A FASCIST? [Y]eah. So… Truth, Reciprocity, Rule of Law, Markets that produce prosperity, Family as the central object of policy, paying the underclass not to breed, direct redistribution of liquidity and the polity’s dividends, ending all rent seeking and parasitism both political, financial, and commercial. Exclusionary Nationalism as a means of increasing tolerance for inter-class redistribution, increasing the opportunity for local status attainment; producing commons suitable to the demographics; reducing all possible costs of mutual cooperation and invention; public-private investment in technological, industrial, and commercial innovation. And total suppression of political warfare to impose any alternative. Yeah. Well, that’s my version of Natural Law and it looks a whole lot like NATIONAL SOCIALISM without the silly mustache. So yeah. In the sense that fascism refers to zero tolerance for opposition to all of the above, I’m definitely a fascist. And if you aren’t also then you have no idea what you’re saying other than advocating for free riding, parasitism and predation upon others. So the question is, if you’re not the same kind of fascist, then you’re by definition an unethical and immoral enemy of not only me and mine but all mankind.
-
Is There a Place for The Left?
September 18th, 2018 12:18 PM IS THERE A PLACE FOR THE LEFT?
—“Under your natural law, Is there a place for the left?”—
[T]here is a place for EXCHANGE between anyone, but predation and parasitism by no one. It’s not true that left wingers invent more than right. It’s true that leftists and rightists innovate in different areas: left consumption and release of normative constraint vs right order and release of existential constraints. I mean, I have absurd orderliness, and I still was voted most likely to succeed as a practicing artist by the faculty two years in a row. creativity occurs across the spectrum, but it’s creativity in WHAT? There is a place for everyone, there is just no place for parasitism and the left innovates means of parasitism and consumption to obtain its freedom from the right, and the right innovations suppression of parasitism and consumption in order to obtain its freedom from the left. The left and the feminine mind it evolved from cannot compete so it engages in rents, parasitism and predation to obtain what they see as proportionality independent of merit, and what we see as proportionality by merit. They have lower agency. They are not fully human. And this is why we must separate if possible, so that we can continue to speciate by proportionality: whether equalitarian and irreciprocal, or meritocratic and reciprocal. REVOLT, SEPARATE, PROSPER, SPECIATE. They will devolve and we will evolve and leave them behind.
-
We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, because it is an ideal, and so tainted
We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, because it is an ideal, and so tainted that it’s meaningless. We use the terms Agency (via positiva) and Sovereignty (via negativa) and Reciprocity (via voluntary, productive), and we state operationally what those mean.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-16 16:53:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1041369485700202496
-
The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)
MALE RECIPROCITY(OPPORTUNITY) VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY (CONSUMPTION) The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F) SELF (ACTION) – ASCENDENT BIAS 1) (M) Negative Freedom (Liberty) vs (F) Positive Freedom OTHERS FEMALE BIAS – THE HERD 2) (M) Reciprocity (Fairness) vs (F) Proportionality(Equality): rendering justice according to shared rules; opposite of cheating 3) (M) Defense (Negative) vs (F) Care (Positive): cherishing and protecting others; opposite of harm COMMON – ESTABLISHED MALE BIAS – THE PACK 4) (M) Loyalty vs (F) Devotion(Ingroup): standing with your family, group, nation; opposite of betrayal. 5) (M) Authority vs (F) Respect: submitting to tradition and legitimate authority; opposite of subversion 6) (M) Sanctity vs (F) Purity: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions; opposite of degradation. (M) Absorb Cellular Damage. (F) Limit Cellular Damage
-
The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F)
MALE RECIPROCITY(OPPORTUNITY) VS FEMALE PROPORTIONALITY (CONSUMPTION) The Moral Foundations by Gender Bias (M vs F) SELF (ACTION) – ASCENDENT BIAS 1) (M) Negative Freedom (Liberty) vs (F) Positive Freedom OTHERS FEMALE BIAS – THE HERD 2) (M) Reciprocity (Fairness) vs (F) Proportionality(Equality): rendering justice according to shared rules; opposite of cheating 3) (M) Defense (Negative) vs (F) Care (Positive): cherishing and protecting others; opposite of harm COMMON – ESTABLISHED MALE BIAS – THE PACK 4) (M) Loyalty vs (F) Devotion(Ingroup): standing with your family, group, nation; opposite of betrayal. 5) (M) Authority vs (F) Respect: submitting to tradition and legitimate authority; opposite of subversion 6) (M) Sanctity vs (F) Purity: abhorrence for disgusting things, foods, actions; opposite of degradation. (M) Absorb Cellular Damage. (F) Limit Cellular Damage
-
In the absence of the talent of empathy for others one can only rely on empathy
In the absence of the talent of empathy for others one can only rely on empathy with the self. in the absence of education in natural law we are forced to rely on empathy. As in all things intuition does not scale beyond the trivial.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-12 14:32:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1039884497603440640
-
In the absence of the talent of empathy for others one can only rely on empathy
In the absence of the talent of empathy for others one can only rely on empathy with the self. in the absence of education in natural law we are forced to rely on empathy. As in all things intuition does not scale beyond the trivial.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-12 10:32:00 UTC
-
September 12th, 2018 10:32 AM [I]n the absence of the talent of empathy for othe
September 12th, 2018 10:32 AM
[I]n the absence of the talent of empathy for others one can only rely on empathy with the self. in the absence of education in natural law we are forced to rely on empathy. As in all things intuition does not scale beyond the trivial.