Theme: Reciprocity

  • EXPLAINING RECIPROCITY TO A NEWB —“…If I see someone being raped, but do not

    EXPLAINING RECIPROCITY TO A NEWB

    —“…If I see someone being raped, but do nothing to help….”—

    Then by law, “You failed to remove the bad”.

    Incremental Suppression: the discovery and canonization of ‘bads’ (violations of reciprocity) by use of the one law of reciprocity (tort), the jury, and an independent professional judiciary, provides the most rapid means possible of continuous incremental suppressions of free riding, parasitism, and predation

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity: the demand for Productive, Fully Informed, Warrantied, Voluntary Transfer of Demonstrated Interests (property), Free of Imposition of Costs upon the Demonstrated Interests (property) of others by externality.

    Remove the bad: Every man a warrior, sheriff, juror, legislator of the one natural law of reciprocity.

    |WESTERN CIVILIZATION| Transcendence (Evolutionary Velocity) via Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The judiciary of the natural law, and the consequential markets in everything. Where there the militia constitutions a private partnership and there is no state to perform the function of insurer of last resort, every man demonstrates reciprocity by performing the function of insurer of last resort.

    —“You’re conflating “good””—

    Anything that is not bad is good. Bads can be known. The preferential, the good (reciprocal preferential), are preferences. Whether they are preference or good is an opinion. Whether they are ‘bad’ and a violation of reciprocity is not an opinion. It is a fact (by Logical Necessity).

    —“Sacrifices”–

    No animal, including humans, demonstrates altruism, only kin selection, option buying, status acquisition (opportunity gain and discount), and reciprocity (debt) payment against status loss (and therefore opportunity loss). We cast this self interest as virtuous in order to acquire more of such behavior by grant of status to heroic display.

    —“…being good…”—

    Man is, by all evidence, amoral – preying upon or cooperating with as suits his self interest. Given a long time frame, it is in one’s self interest to cooperate because of the outsized returns on cooperation versus predation and boycott. One is ‘virtuous’ because all ‘virtues’ decrease the opportunity costs of cooperation and provide discounts on those higher returns. The fact that we attribute status (pay for with opportunity discounts [trust, recommendation, referrals], is merely compensation (investment) in the production of reciprocity by those with most evidence of it.

    QUOD ERAT DEMONSTRANDUM

    I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job.

    😉 lol


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-25 08:27:00 UTC

  • Q: How Can I Learn About Propertarianism or Natural Law?

    October 22nd, 2018 11:44 AM Q: HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW?

    —“I’m interested in learning about your stance on propertarianism. So, how do you define the natural law? It’s something I’ve been searching and curious about for some time. And how does Propertarianism relate to this? In fact, I’m curious about the whole thing to be honest”— A Friend

    1 – FIRST QUESTION: WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? What is Natural Law? Reciprocity. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/ For Christians, Natural Law in Your Context. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/natural-law-for-christians/ Natural Law Results in Market “Fascism”. propertarianism.com/2018/07/17/natural-law-facism-market-fascism/ West Developed Natural Law To Profit From Domestication of Man (Eugenics). propertarianism.com/2018/06/27/natural-law-of-sovereign-men-domesticating-animal-man-for-peers-and-profit/ Is Natural Law a Cult? (a Cult of The Law?) (it’s a cult of sovereignty) propertarianism.com/2018/06/16/is-natural-law-a-cult/ It’s Natural Law “Fundamentalism” (“The White Law”) propertarianism.com/2018/05/13/natural-law-fundamentalism/ It’s a Cult of Sovereignty Enforced by Law propertarianism.com/2018/04/14/the-cult-of-sovereignty-natural-law/ Why I Write Natural Law and Science Not Philosophy propertarianism.com/2018/02/25/why-i-write-natural-law-science-not-philosophy-choice/ Each of those posts is pretty short. Read in order, you’ll mostly ‘get’ it. Sometimes you have to read through those posts a few times. But it’s not that hard. You will understand. 2 – SECOND QUESTION: How does propertarianism relate to natural law? It’s the application of natural law to all fields of inquiry (the scope of human knowledge). The scope of work would better be named “The Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or just “Natural Law“. However, I solved ‘ethics’ first, and the name for that ethics is ‘propertarianism’. So we ‘stuck with propertarianism’ simply because of name recognition. The Scope of Propertarianism (or whatever you choose to call it: “Natural Law“, or “Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or “The White Law” or the “Philosophy of Western Civilization” ): propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/the-scope-of-propertarianism-natural-law/3 – THIRD QUESTION: THE OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY: An overview of the content of Propertarianism. propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

  • Q: How Can I Learn About Propertarianism or Natural Law?

    October 22nd, 2018 11:44 AM Q: HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW?

    —“I’m interested in learning about your stance on propertarianism. So, how do you define the natural law? It’s something I’ve been searching and curious about for some time. And how does Propertarianism relate to this? In fact, I’m curious about the whole thing to be honest”— A Friend

    1 – FIRST QUESTION: WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? What is Natural Law? Reciprocity. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/ For Christians, Natural Law in Your Context. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/natural-law-for-christians/ Natural Law Results in Market “Fascism”. propertarianism.com/2018/07/17/natural-law-facism-market-fascism/ West Developed Natural Law To Profit From Domestication of Man (Eugenics). propertarianism.com/2018/06/27/natural-law-of-sovereign-men-domesticating-animal-man-for-peers-and-profit/ Is Natural Law a Cult? (a Cult of The Law?) (it’s a cult of sovereignty) propertarianism.com/2018/06/16/is-natural-law-a-cult/ It’s Natural Law “Fundamentalism” (“The White Law”) propertarianism.com/2018/05/13/natural-law-fundamentalism/ It’s a Cult of Sovereignty Enforced by Law propertarianism.com/2018/04/14/the-cult-of-sovereignty-natural-law/ Why I Write Natural Law and Science Not Philosophy propertarianism.com/2018/02/25/why-i-write-natural-law-science-not-philosophy-choice/ Each of those posts is pretty short. Read in order, you’ll mostly ‘get’ it. Sometimes you have to read through those posts a few times. But it’s not that hard. You will understand. 2 – SECOND QUESTION: How does propertarianism relate to natural law? It’s the application of natural law to all fields of inquiry (the scope of human knowledge). The scope of work would better be named “The Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or just “Natural Law“. However, I solved ‘ethics’ first, and the name for that ethics is ‘propertarianism’. So we ‘stuck with propertarianism’ simply because of name recognition. The Scope of Propertarianism (or whatever you choose to call it: “Natural Law“, or “Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or “The White Law” or the “Philosophy of Western Civilization” ): propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/the-scope-of-propertarianism-natural-law/3 – THIRD QUESTION: THE OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY: An overview of the content of Propertarianism. propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

  • “We live under discretionary law disguised as legislature (rule by law) oppose t

    —“We live under discretionary law disguised as legislature (rule by law) oppose to rule of law (iterative and incremental approaching asymptotic perfect reciprocity)”— Bill Joslin

    (perfect <3 )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 14:35:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054380796042248192

  • HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW? —“I’m interested in lear

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/Q: HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW?

    —“I’m interested in learning about your stance on propertarianism. So, how do you define the natural law? It’s something I’ve been searching and curious about for some time. And how does Propertarianism relate to this? In fact, I’m curious about the whole thing to be honest”— A Friend

    1 – FIRST QUESTION: WHAT IS NATURAL LAW?

    What is Natural Law? Reciprocity.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/

    For Christians, Natural Law in Your Context.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/natural-law-for-christians/

    Natural Law Results in Market “Fascism”.

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/07/17/natural-law-facism-market-fascism/

    West Developed Natural Law To Profit From Domestication of Man (Eugenics).

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/06/27/natural-law-of-sovereign-men-domesticating-animal-man-for-peers-and-profit/

    Is Natural Law a Cult? (a Cult of The Law?)

    (it’s a cult of sovereignty)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/06/16/is-natural-law-a-cult/

    It’s Natural Law “Fundamentalism” (“The White Law”)

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/05/13/natural-law-fundamentalism/

    It’s a Cult of Sovereignty Enforced by Law

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/04/14/the-cult-of-sovereignty-natural-law/

    WHY I WRITE NATURAL LAW AND SCIENCE NOT PHILOSOPHY

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/02/25/why-i-write-natural-law-science-not-philosophy-choice/

    Each of those posts is pretty short. Read in order, you’ll mostly ‘get’ it. Sometimes you have to read through those posts a few times. But it’s not that hard. You will understand.

    2 – SECOND QUESTION:

    How does propertarianism relate to natural law? It’s the application of natural law to all fields of inquiry (the scope of human knowledge).

    The scope of work would better be named “The Natural Law of Sovereign Men”, or just “Natural Law”. However, i solved ‘ethics’ first, and the name for that ethics is ‘propertarianism’. So we ‘stuck with propertarianism’ simply because of name recognition.

    The Scope of Propertarianism (or whatever you choose to call it: “Natural Law”, or “Natural Law of Sovereign Men”, or “The White Law” or the “hHilosophy of Western Civilization” ):

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/the-scope-of-propertarianism-natural-law/

    3 – THIRD QUESTION: THE OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY: An overview of the content of Propertarianism.

    https://propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 11:44:00 UTC

  • “We live under discretionary law disguised as legislature (rule by law) oppose t

    —“We live under discretionary law disguised as legislature (rule by law) oppose to rule of law (iterative and incremental approaching asymptotic perfect reciprocity)”— Bill Joslin

    (perfect ♥ )


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-22 10:35:00 UTC

  • Evola vs Doolittle

    October 18th, 2018 9:32 AM EVOLA VS DOOLITTLE by Ahmed Reda [W]e live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.

  • Evola vs Doolittle

    October 18th, 2018 9:32 AM EVOLA VS DOOLITTLE by Ahmed Reda [W]e live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.

  • Universal Law: All Religious Rituals Consist of Repayments of Debts

    Universal Law: All Religious Rituals Consist of Repayments of Debts.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 15:36:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1052946454338265088

  • Universal Law: All Religious Rituals Consist of Repayments of Debts. That’s why

    Universal Law: All Religious Rituals Consist of Repayments of Debts. That’s why they ‘feel good’.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 11:35:00 UTC