Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • OUR SOLUTION – AND OUR LIMITED FUNCTION IN IT. 1) We are the JUDGES of the NATUR

    OUR SOLUTION – AND OUR LIMITED FUNCTION IN IT.

    1) We are the JUDGES of the NATURAL LAW – the JUDGES of our polity. “Those Who State Limits.”

    2) There are warriors, artists, scientists, engineers, craftsman, doctors, and mothers. Their jobs are ‘what shall we do and ‘how shall we do it’. Our job in the division of labor – a division of unequal knowledge and function – but equal duty and responsibility.

    3) Signals alone will drive excellence out of what we shall do, if natural law is imposed upon them since the GOOD and EXCELLENT are the only means possible available to them.

    4) Our men will build valhalla because we leave them no other choice. Our men will make immortality because we leave them no other choice. Our men will reach the stars because we leave them no other choice. We do not need instruct them to do so because we leave them no other choice.

    5) As judges we must prosecute violators of the natural law. No matter who, where, and when they may be.

    6) Our way is War: to eliminate that which is bad – leaving those with less agency to produce only that which is good. We parent mankind by this means alone. Not by telling them what to do. But by telling them what not to do, and leaving them to discover all possible means of doing what else they may do?

    It is for the lesser people – all who have failed – to anchor their people in an era by stating that which they must or should do other than avoid or defeat that which is false or bad.

    The uniqueness of western civilization is sovereignty reciprocity truth, duty, and the law – producing markets of the good by eliminating the bad, and thereby continuously calculating our transformation into gods – omniscient and omnipotent – by the fastest means possible: trial and error.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-11 09:08:00 UTC

  • THE NORMAL WORLD VS THE ABNORMAL HIGH TRUST WEST —“Japanese are basically as i

    THE NORMAL WORLD VS THE ABNORMAL HIGH TRUST WEST

    —“Japanese are basically as irreciprocal and asymmetric as jews – but with a twist. In that, while they don’t like cheating, defrauding, lying, and stealing, etc. that would cause retaliation, they are always asking the question “is it good for japan?” the way jews ask “is it good for jews?” India does that too – the question is always “is it good for india? And they are very clear on ingroup vs outgroup in everything – and not just race, but family. There are different pronouns for things like mother, father, our company, your company, etc. depending on how you are talking to and your relative position. The Vietnamese language is same way. In vietnam its blatantly clear that everything inside is from your fathers side: patriarchy.”– James

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-10 08:35:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE NORMAL WORLD VS THE ABNORMAL HIGH TRUST WEST —“Japanese are basically as irreciprocal and asymmetric as jews – but with a twist. In that, while they don’t like cheating, defrauding, lying, and stealing, etc. that would cause retaliation, they are always asking the question “is it good for japan?” the way jews ask “is it good for jews?” India does that too – the question is always “is it good for india? And they are very clear on ingroup vs outgroup in everything – and not just race, but family. There are different pronouns for things like mother, father, our company, your company, etc. depending on how you are talking to and your relative position. The Vietnamese language is same way. In vietnam its blatantly clear that everything inside is from your fathers side: patriarchy.”– James

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE NORMAL WORLD VS THE ABNORMAL HIGH TRUST WEST —“Japanese are basically as irreciprocal and asymmetric as jews – but with a twist. In that, while they don’t like cheating, defrauding, lying, and stealing, etc. that would cause retaliation, they are always asking the question “is it good for japan?” the way jews ask “is it good for jews?” India does that too – the question is always “is it good for india? And they are very clear on ingroup vs outgroup in everything – and not just race, but family. There are different pronouns for things like mother, father, our company, your company, etc. depending on how you are talking to and your relative position. The Vietnamese language is same way. In vietnam its blatantly clear that everything inside is from your fathers side: patriarchy.”– James

  • Mercy is for your kin, who have erred in character or judgement. Mercy Elsewhere

    —Mercy is for your kin, who have erred in character or judgement. Mercy Elsewhere is but folly – let none leave the field. Their place is under it.—

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 18:55:00 UTC

  • I don’t do ‘mad’. Emotions as motivations are for animals. I do reciprocity, ret

    I don’t do ‘mad’. Emotions as motivations are for animals. I do reciprocity, returns, eugenics and evolution. My fellow humans understand. You animals don’t, because you can’t. Agency is a property of humans alone. Hence why domesticated animals must be ruled by humans.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 17:20:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060945132478971904

    Reply addressees: @DustinMeek1 @MurphyCartoons

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060933304688562177

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DustinMeek1

    @curtdoolittle @MurphyCartoons You mad about those women’s rights decisions, bra?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060933304688562177

  • by John Mark One of the things that has helped me the most about Curt’s work is

    by John Mark

    One of the things that has helped me the most about Curt’s work is simply thinking in terms of “do they (whatever group) steal or not”. In other words, do they operate in reciprocity (natural law) or not.

    E.g. as Curt says, it’s not capitalism vs socialism, it’s rule of law (reciprocity, natural law, no theft) vs absence of it (corruption, parasitism, theft). (Rough not exact paraphrase)

    So many of the labels/terms people use are poorly defined or have different meanings depending on the speaker (often purposefully so, as a means of deceit/theft).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-09 15:33:00 UTC

  • GOOD CRITICISM: UTOPIANISM? BUT NO…. —“Propertarianism as far as I understan

    GOOD CRITICISM: UTOPIANISM? BUT NO….

    —“Propertarianism as far as I understand is an utopian vision of humanity as primarily rational. An implementation of such an utopian vision may have many unforeseen consequences, as micromanagement of human resources is not in Curt’ strategic vision. The general disapproval of Abrahamic cults within his system may lead to many improvised atrocities, created out of sheer escalation of violence. To conclude – this scene is possible and likely to happen, although Curt would probably disapprove of it.”—Igor Rogov

    –” … an utopian vision of humanity as primarily rational.”–

    No, but that law is conducted rationally empirically and tediously operationally. And the legal class is in fact, rational.

    Frames: Math, Science, Economics, Law, History, Literature, Philosophy, Religion(Theology), and the Occult and Magic. People.

    —“… An implementation of such an utopian vision may have many unforeseen consequences,…”—

    Hmmm…. All increases in the suppression of violence, theft, and fraud have predictable universal consequences, and that is raising the cost of doing so, and shifting people either into markets or into more advanced (indirect) means of parasitism.

    All decreases in superstition have produced extraordinary increases in quality of life. The problem we see is the inadequate suppression of pseudoscience(marxism and fiat monetarism), sophism(postmodernism and feminism), and supernaturalism (islam and judaism in particular).

    There is every reason to expect that increases in the ‘scientification’ of the social sciences will produce the same or better returns than the ‘scientification’ of the physical sciences.

    There is certainly every reason to expect that definancializing, de politicizing, and suppressing fraud, libel, and slander will produce windfalls that will restore the pre-72 middle class rates at the expense of financial class and bureaucratic and media rates.

    It’s not that there won’t be unexpected consequences, but that those unexpected consequences have historically been fantastic. It was the rollback of our laws to ‘tolerate’ consumer capitalism that has been the problem.

    THE CONFLICT

    Can you teach mindfulness, ethnonationalism, transcendence and create a non-supernatural religion? Absolutely. it was the hardest problem to solve. it is absolutely possible. if it is possible to teach reading, writing, and arithmetic, manners, ethics, morals and norms, it is possible to teach mindfulness – and we know so that the more desirable civilizations appear to do so. So the argument that we must have a ‘religion of nonsense’ is false.

    However….

    If people wanna make cults they will no matter what anyone does because it fills a need. That does not mean the need the cults fill is the only one possible.

    As today many means of framing the world exist in each culture with classes navigating to the most useful.

    I have been struggling to further understand, but as someone (possibly also Igor) helped me understand, Slavic civ does not have one other than the church. However, the west has all of those Frames listed above; India has at least the scientific, legal, political-philosophical, and traditional-religious. And china has the scientific, bureaucratic, wisdom lit, and buddhism. Japan has the the shinto and buddhist as well as feudal martial, and confucian and now scientific. I can go through most cultures but one of the things I have come to understand is that there are cultures that produced no wisdom lits of their own. And this is a bigger hurdle than I had originally imagined.

    So this is why it is easier for some western groups and harder than others, is longer periods under MORE LITERATURES, producing classes in each of the literatures over time. Thereby relying on a portfolio rather than a monopoly.

    PROPERTARIANISM’S CONTENTS:

    1) explain the cause of western uniqueness (Done)

    2) create a formal, value-independent, cross disciplinary, fully commensurable language sufficient for decidability of ALL conflicts in court, thereby restoring the market for common law in opposition to the market for goods services and information.. (Done)

    3) create a constitution restoring that uniqueness using that language (Done) within that constitution, ALSO provide a set of incentives for definancializing, de-propagandizing, de-politicizing the current era.( Done)

    4) Apply the method to all questions – literally all. Such that we demonstrate how these CAN be decided. In other words produce a canon of solved problems so that lies cannot be made as they were in the past.

    5) Produce advice on a “means of transition.”

    AS SUCH

    it is an evolutionary enhancement of law that extends the current tort constraint on goods and services and the speech regarding each to political speech in order to compensate for the industrialization of lying that has been made possible by the development of mass media.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 20:05:00 UTC

  • In other words, yes, I’m shaming you for trying to obtain sovereignty at a disco

    In other words, yes, I’m shaming you for trying to obtain sovereignty at a discount, (fraud), because you are shaming me for stating that sovereignty cannot be obtained at a discount (truth).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 19:52:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060621116132245505

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060608670025875462

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060608670025875462

  • No, that is what a woman would say. A man says, “For my people – whatever it tak

    No, that is what a woman would say. A man says, “For my people – whatever it takes.” The only restitution for the reciprocity of displacement and genocide is displacement and genocide. This is morality, this is the Law.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-08 18:48:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060605113012772865

    Reply addressees: @readomain

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060599792315916288

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1060599792315916288