Theme: Reciprocity

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550503635 Timestamp) AGAINST CULTS. PROPERTARIANISM IS FOR EVERYONE. Every group with every grammar of cognition can use Propertarianism: religious, ideological philosophical, scientific, or practical. We can all use this law to unite behind policy rather than religion, philosophy, or ideology. So don’t make me a ‘cult’ leader. Don’t ask me to be one. I’m not special. I’m just a guy working on one of the great problems of our age – and because of the great minds before me, and the shoulders I can stand upon, I did. So I’m not special. Propertarianism is like having a superpower, just like aristotelian reason, empiricism, and the scientific method were like a superpower in ages past. So understand, it’s not me it’s the methodology. I’m only special because this superpower is rare at present. With some work you can learn this ‘superpower’. And then for you too, the world will ‘fit together in very nice clean obvious puzzle pieces’. But I’m not important. I’m not special, and I expect to generate leaders who will use this superpower. I prefer to wear my metaphorical Odin robes and pointy hat, and advise leaders – not be one. Aristotle changed the world of mind but it is Alexander who conquered the world of men.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550503635 Timestamp) AGAINST CULTS. PROPERTARIANISM IS FOR EVERYONE. Every group with every grammar of cognition can use Propertarianism: religious, ideological philosophical, scientific, or practical. We can all use this law to unite behind policy rather than religion, philosophy, or ideology. So don’t make me a ‘cult’ leader. Don’t ask me to be one. I’m not special. I’m just a guy working on one of the great problems of our age – and because of the great minds before me, and the shoulders I can stand upon, I did. So I’m not special. Propertarianism is like having a superpower, just like aristotelian reason, empiricism, and the scientific method were like a superpower in ages past. So understand, it’s not me it’s the methodology. I’m only special because this superpower is rare at present. With some work you can learn this ‘superpower’. And then for you too, the world will ‘fit together in very nice clean obvious puzzle pieces’. But I’m not important. I’m not special, and I expect to generate leaders who will use this superpower. I prefer to wear my metaphorical Odin robes and pointy hat, and advise leaders – not be one. Aristotle changed the world of mind but it is Alexander who conquered the world of men.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550668909 Timestamp) Rothbard (Jewish Pale) and Hoppe (German Free Cities) via positiva, via rationalism. Doolittle(Rights of Englishmen) via negativa, via empiricism. Construct a value system by appeal(RH), or prohibit an anti-value system with violence (D). Inspiration and indoctrination (RH) vs prohibition and market for prosecution(D). Unlimited suppression of parasitic behavior that generates retaliation (D), suppression limited to intersubjectively verifiable property (RH). Suppression of blackmail, defamation, public sophism, supernaturalism pseudoscience( marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism). Doolittle: existential survivable without imperial protection, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: dependent, non existential without imperial protection. Doolittle: demonstrated, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: not demonstrated, not modelable, not survivable under competition. RH not possible due to praxeological incentives, and D possible because of praxeological testable incentives. No RH community can form or survive market for polities without parasitic dependence upon an empire because of insufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. vs Any D community can survive in the market for polities because it does not depend upon an external empire because of sufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. Crusoe’s island depends upon the ‘free’ protection of a vast ocean. The ghetto depends upon the host city or state. And the Free Cities, The Pale (european wildlands), The American/Australian wildlands, and Iceland/Greenland – all depend upon the host empire, and are economically subsidized by lack of political competition, and the availability of cheap and settleable land. The ghetto ethics of the jews and being exterminated for it on a regular basis versus the high trust ethics of the people who dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition poverty starvation disease hard labor early death…. and the quality of life that people seek despite the costs of commons required to do so. ie: RH consists of pretense that ‘children’ polities, subsidized by parents, can compete against adult polities on their own merits in competition by military, political, economic, religious, demographic, warfare that never ends.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550668909 Timestamp) Rothbard (Jewish Pale) and Hoppe (German Free Cities) via positiva, via rationalism. Doolittle(Rights of Englishmen) via negativa, via empiricism. Construct a value system by appeal(RH), or prohibit an anti-value system with violence (D). Inspiration and indoctrination (RH) vs prohibition and market for prosecution(D). Unlimited suppression of parasitic behavior that generates retaliation (D), suppression limited to intersubjectively verifiable property (RH). Suppression of blackmail, defamation, public sophism, supernaturalism pseudoscience( marxism, postmodernism, feminism, denialism). Doolittle: existential survivable without imperial protection, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: dependent, non existential without imperial protection. Doolittle: demonstrated, vs Rothbard and Hoppe: not demonstrated, not modelable, not survivable under competition. RH not possible due to praxeological incentives, and D possible because of praxeological testable incentives. No RH community can form or survive market for polities without parasitic dependence upon an empire because of insufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. vs Any D community can survive in the market for polities because it does not depend upon an external empire because of sufficient incentives for defense and production of commons and their resulting multipliers in competition with free riders. Crusoe’s island depends upon the ‘free’ protection of a vast ocean. The ghetto depends upon the host city or state. And the Free Cities, The Pale (european wildlands), The American/Australian wildlands, and Iceland/Greenland – all depend upon the host empire, and are economically subsidized by lack of political competition, and the availability of cheap and settleable land. The ghetto ethics of the jews and being exterminated for it on a regular basis versus the high trust ethics of the people who dragged humanity kicking and screaming out of ignorance superstition poverty starvation disease hard labor early death…. and the quality of life that people seek despite the costs of commons required to do so. ie: RH consists of pretense that ‘children’ polities, subsidized by parents, can compete against adult polities on their own merits in competition by military, political, economic, religious, demographic, warfare that never ends.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550691102 Timestamp) YOUR JOB (THE GOOD) VS MY JOB (THE TRUE) Your job is ‘inspiring, good and preferable’, Mine is ‘False, Un-testifiable, and Ir-reciprocal’. Anything that is not false, testifiable, and reciprocal is by definition not open to interference from the law. Your job is the via positiva market for goods, services, and information, and my job is the via negativa market for prosecution of the imposition of costs against the demonstrated interests of others.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550691102 Timestamp) YOUR JOB (THE GOOD) VS MY JOB (THE TRUE) Your job is ‘inspiring, good and preferable’, Mine is ‘False, Un-testifiable, and Ir-reciprocal’. Anything that is not false, testifiable, and reciprocal is by definition not open to interference from the law. Your job is the via positiva market for goods, services, and information, and my job is the via negativa market for prosecution of the imposition of costs against the demonstrated interests of others.

  • Property Defined – for The 1000Th Time

    PROPERTY – FOR THE 1000TH TIME February 21st, 2019 4:06 PM (Not going to repeat every single refutation here. If you encounter one where you think you ‘got me’ it won’t happen. sorry. Just ask how we handle it.) ; DEMAND FOR POSSESSION, PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS. 1) Cooperation provides disproportionate returns necessary for survival 2) Division of labor multiplies disproportionate returns on cooperation. 3) Reciprocity incentivizes cooperation. Cheating disincentivizes cooperation. 4) Humans engage in both retaliation, and altruistic (costly) punishment of cheaters in order to preserve the disproportionate returns on cooperation and cooperation at scale. 5) Morality consists of reciprocity within the local limits of proportionality. Man is amoral and acts in hist interests it is just nearly always in his better long term interests to act morally. 6) Law evolved to prevent retaliation cycles, to standardize means of conflict resolution, to maintain maximum returns for the majority of the polity, and to increase the revenues of taxing authorities. 7) Law uses a single measure: demonstrated investment which we call interests or ‘property’ to resolve conflicts and preserve the peace (returns on cooperation), and a single test: reciprocity. Ths law is called ‘tort’ or ‘natural law’. 8) Law evolves through the continuous evolutionary suppression of violations of reciprocity, through the continuous discovery of findings of law. It is a purely empirical process. 9) All social science can be expressed in terms of identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. 10) All human cognition can be expressed as reward system responses to that same identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. THEREFORE; Ergo PROPERTARIANISM consist of a universal language of linguistic, psychological, and social sciences that makes use of a standard of measure we commonly call property. WHEREAS; “Property” refers to: 1) MEASUREMENT: A category of measurements, within that category we call weights and measures, that provides commensurability and therefore decidability, over the use of all possible human interests, in matters of conflict over those interests, where those interests satisfy any demonstrated human demand. AND WHERE; Property consists in that series: 1) POSSESSION(IN FACT): That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use. 2) PROPERTY(NORMATIVE: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another. 3) PROPERTY RIGHTS(INSURED): that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another. AND WHERE; Rights include no less than: 1) Constituo – “ Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. 2) Transitus – “ Transit: passage through 3d space. 3) Usus -“ Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – “ Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – “ Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – “ Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. AND WHERE; Property includes any INTEREST we observe by: 1) DEFENSE: Men are willing to defend with violence 2) INVESTMENT: Have a demonstrable investment in 3) NON-IMPOSITION: Acquired that investment without imposing a cost on others. (via john Zebley) WHERE Interests are demonstrated by: EITHER … 0) Origination (Homesteading, “Constituo”) OR … 1) Productive (no blackmail etc) … 2) Fully informed (no asymmetric knowledge) … 3) Warrantied (responsible fo asymmetric knowledge) … 4) Voluntary transfer (non coercive) AND IN BOTH CASES, WHERE … 5) Such action is free of violation of the same by externality. (unharmful) AND WHERE; Man demonstrates interest and defends the following categories of his means of production: 1) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF EXISTENCE Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” – Physical Body – Actions and Time – Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. – Knowledge ties (skills, crafts) – Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over. AND; 2) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF REPRODUCTION Means of Reproduction: “relationships with others and tools of relationships upon which we reciprocally depend.” – Mates (access to sex/reproduction) – Children (genetic reproduction) – Familial Relations (security) – Consanguineous Relations (tribal and family ties) – Racial property (racial ties) – Status and Class (reputation) AND; 3). MEANS OF PRIVATE PRODUCTION Relational Property – Non-Familial Relations (utility) – Organizational ties (work) Cooperative Property – Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership) Artificial Property – Monopoly Property such as intellectual property. (grants of limited monopoly within a geography) – Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography). AND; 4). MEANS OF COMMONS PRODUCTION (Community) Property

    • Institutional Property: “Those objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”
    • Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consists of forgone opportunities.

    • Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. Formal institutional property is easy to price. costs are visible. And the productivity of the social order is at least marginally measurable.

    • Territory and attendant resources.

    —-END—

  • Property Defined – for The 1000Th Time

    PROPERTY – FOR THE 1000TH TIME February 21st, 2019 4:06 PM (Not going to repeat every single refutation here. If you encounter one where you think you ‘got me’ it won’t happen. sorry. Just ask how we handle it.) ; DEMAND FOR POSSESSION, PROPERTY, PROPERTY RIGHTS. 1) Cooperation provides disproportionate returns necessary for survival 2) Division of labor multiplies disproportionate returns on cooperation. 3) Reciprocity incentivizes cooperation. Cheating disincentivizes cooperation. 4) Humans engage in both retaliation, and altruistic (costly) punishment of cheaters in order to preserve the disproportionate returns on cooperation and cooperation at scale. 5) Morality consists of reciprocity within the local limits of proportionality. Man is amoral and acts in hist interests it is just nearly always in his better long term interests to act morally. 6) Law evolved to prevent retaliation cycles, to standardize means of conflict resolution, to maintain maximum returns for the majority of the polity, and to increase the revenues of taxing authorities. 7) Law uses a single measure: demonstrated investment which we call interests or ‘property’ to resolve conflicts and preserve the peace (returns on cooperation), and a single test: reciprocity. Ths law is called ‘tort’ or ‘natural law’. 8) Law evolves through the continuous evolutionary suppression of violations of reciprocity, through the continuous discovery of findings of law. It is a purely empirical process. 9) All social science can be expressed in terms of identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. 10) All human cognition can be expressed as reward system responses to that same identification, acquisition, transformation, transfer, consumption, and loss of interests in property. THEREFORE; Ergo PROPERTARIANISM consist of a universal language of linguistic, psychological, and social sciences that makes use of a standard of measure we commonly call property. WHEREAS; “Property” refers to: 1) MEASUREMENT: A category of measurements, within that category we call weights and measures, that provides commensurability and therefore decidability, over the use of all possible human interests, in matters of conflict over those interests, where those interests satisfy any demonstrated human demand. AND WHERE; Property consists in that series: 1) POSSESSION(IN FACT): That which I have acted to prevent others from consumption or use. 2) PROPERTY(NORMATIVE: That which you and I agree not to use or consume from one another. 3) PROPERTY RIGHTS(INSURED): that which a third party will insure we do not use or consume from one another. AND WHERE; Rights include no less than: 1) Constituo – “ Homesteading: Convert into property through bearing a cost of transformation. 2) Transitus – “ Transit: passage through 3d space. 3) Usus -“ Use: setting up a stall. 4) Fructus – “ Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits) 5) Mancipio – “ Emancipation: (sale, transfer) 6) Abusus – “ Abuse: (Consumption or Destruction) Opposite of Constituo. AND WHERE; Property includes any INTEREST we observe by: 1) DEFENSE: Men are willing to defend with violence 2) INVESTMENT: Have a demonstrable investment in 3) NON-IMPOSITION: Acquired that investment without imposing a cost on others. (via john Zebley) WHERE Interests are demonstrated by: EITHER … 0) Origination (Homesteading, “Constituo”) OR … 1) Productive (no blackmail etc) … 2) Fully informed (no asymmetric knowledge) … 3) Warrantied (responsible fo asymmetric knowledge) … 4) Voluntary transfer (non coercive) AND IN BOTH CASES, WHERE … 5) Such action is free of violation of the same by externality. (unharmful) AND WHERE; Man demonstrates interest and defends the following categories of his means of production: 1) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF EXISTENCE Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.” – Physical Body – Actions and Time – Memories, Concepts and Identities: tools that enable us to plan and act. In the consumer economy this includes brands. – Knowledge ties (skills, crafts) – Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over. AND; 2) MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF REPRODUCTION Means of Reproduction: “relationships with others and tools of relationships upon which we reciprocally depend.” – Mates (access to sex/reproduction) – Children (genetic reproduction) – Familial Relations (security) – Consanguineous Relations (tribal and family ties) – Racial property (racial ties) – Status and Class (reputation) AND; 3). MEANS OF PRIVATE PRODUCTION Relational Property – Non-Familial Relations (utility) – Organizational ties (work) Cooperative Property – Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership) Artificial Property – Monopoly Property such as intellectual property. (grants of limited monopoly within a geography) – Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography). AND; 4). MEANS OF COMMONS PRODUCTION (Community) Property

    • Institutional Property: “Those objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”
    • Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consists of forgone opportunities.

    • Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion (including the secular religion), Government, Laws. Formal institutional property is easy to price. costs are visible. And the productivity of the social order is at least marginally measurable.

    • Territory and attendant resources.

    —-END—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1550933257 Timestamp) DEFINITIONS: SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG VERSIONS WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Short) Propertarianism is a system of law designed to prevent lying in politics. … … WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Medium) Propertarianism is a methodology that completes the scientific method; the application of that method to the law; a set of amendments to restore rule of law; including the prevention of lying about commerce, finance, economics, law, and politics in public speech. … … WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? (Long) Propertarianism refers to a body of work. That body of work consists of: … 1. HISTORY: An explanation for the disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient and modern worlds. … 2. METHOD: The completion of the scientific method and and its embodiment in law. … 3. APPLICATION: Application of that method to all fields and common moral and legal questions. … 4. LAW: A formal, algorithmic, operational, logic of law. … 5. CONSTITUTION: A set of Recommended Amendments to the Constitution for the United States – preserving the current legal entity, while altering the current means of government. … 6. POLICIES: a set of policies to reform our military, political, economic, financial, and social orders. … 7. RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation that insurrection be used to demand implementation of these amendments to the constitution, given the scale of the parasitic classes in and out of government.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1551019955 Timestamp) BEN BAKER ‘GETS IT’ —“I’m trying to understand. … Law is then a summary of natural (proper and just) consequences for action/inaction. As far as it can be enforced depends on the affordability…this would also determine the willingness of men to administer and enforce the law via Incentives. It’s an immovable object, or very nearly. Government (governance deferred from the individual to a collective specialising in law and violence, held in common somewhat and funded by citizens) is the flexible part, the expression of that described above but adjusted to each population with their endemic characteristics, abilities etc. Holy shit.”—Benjamin Baker You just graduated my friend. Welcome to the judiciary. 😉