Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549307787 Timestamp) —“Rewriting the Bible with Propertarian language in line with truth and the natural law of reciprocity would instantly create the religion that many keep demanding of you without any sacrifice in terms of what direction propertarianism would carry the country and by extension the world. The re-domestication of Christians would be a net positive for everyone.”— That is VERY FKING SMART. Never occurred to me. I think in terms of writing the law. A ‘law book’. But you know the influence such a bible would have would be … well…wow Completing jefferson’s project. I think you just solved my last problem. dammit. I hate it when the answer is in my face —“I know the religious problem is difficult because there is so much convoluted language involved. It’s tough to sort out meaning but this could actually be to the advantage of Propertarianism. Now that your sights are on it you’ll be able to sort it out even better than me because of your mastery in scientific language.”— I think… I think we could create a sort of wiki and do a paragraph by paragraph translation and combine the repetitive stories into one… hmmm…. yep. I’ve re-written two – cain and abel, and the garden of eden, but the whole book can be done? “In the beginning…” becomes an opportunity for comparative religion, and the opportunity to herald christianity…hmm… —“Exactly! It’s really brilliant and I think it is precisely what is needed to “lift the vail” from the eyes of the western world. I’ll see if I can make time this week to write up a sample to submit for your analysis.”— We write the Law (rome) rewrite Aristotle(greece), and Rewrite the Bible (byzantium) and … well, you know, that sort of unites Germania, Rome, Athens, Byzantium, jerusalem, Mesopotamia and Persia. hmm… even india. Even china…. Ugh.. Like I don’t have enough work to do…. sigh.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549254145 Timestamp) —“What is the propertarian position on religion? Is Christianity merely tolerated? And is some form of religion to be valued?”—Arnar Styr Björnsson That it is in need of another reformation or it will continue to die. Neither the vatican II or the evangelical movements were sufficient – although the evangelical more so. 0) Humility in the sacredness of life, nature, and commons 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. The rest is pure nonsense, and it is bad for our people. However, nothing much needs to be done. Restore the church to centrality of education, require that they teach mindfulness (stoicism), and a program of continuous stoicism, and restore consumer banking and the militia to the church again. In exchange require the churches who obtain those benefits to reform. (they can determine that reform themselves) Personally I prefer we eliminate all political religions and restore folk religions (family, ancestors, people, nature). The market pressure for attendance and income with take care of itself. Much more detail. just not in this post.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549380009 Timestamp) —Propertarianism is a methodology and a law. You can create whatever government you want to with that methodology and that law. I propose different governments for different peoples who have different needs.—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549380009 Timestamp) —Propertarianism is a methodology and a law. You can create whatever government you want to with that methodology and that law. I propose different governments for different peoples who have different needs.—

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549575197 Timestamp) —“How to help your normie friends get the concept of propertarianism: “Imagine libertarians. Now strip away all the lies. Then imagine they were men. Now you have Propertarianism.”—- Noah J Revoy Ouch!

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549770090 Timestamp) There is no conflict between christianity and the natural law – they are identical. However, there is a profound conflict between what Christians may publicly claim is true and the natural law. This is a problem for christianity per se, just as it is for islam and judaism. If there is a conflict between christianity(faith) and the law(science) then science prevails under the law. Faith is for spiritual, and the law the existential.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549770090 Timestamp) There is no conflict between christianity and the natural law – they are identical. However, there is a profound conflict between what Christians may publicly claim is true and the natural law. This is a problem for christianity per se, just as it is for islam and judaism. If there is a conflict between christianity(faith) and the law(science) then science prevails under the law. Faith is for spiritual, and the law the existential.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549820681 Timestamp) MORALITY AMORALITY CONFLICT DESPOTISM AND THE SOCIOPATHIC MIND. MORALITY Some basis of morality either exists or it does not. The science, law, and logic say that such a thing is called reciprocity, and reciprocity within the bounds of proportionality, and outside of the bounds of proportionality exit is necessary for any disadvantaged party. And that prohibition on or unbearable cost of exit is the origin of conflict, fighting, and war. AMORALITY If no basis for morality exists, then all that is required is power to force whatever order upon people that is useful. This is a license for any and all for corruption at every level. In other worse, one has rule of law and decidability, or one has rule by man and authority. CONFLICT The evolution of the law has been a battle between corruption (rule by man) and morality (rule of law). Even socialism (rule by man) and capitalism (rule of law), and globalism (rule by men) and nationalism (rule of law), and representative democracy (rule by men), and direct democracy (rule of law) are simply various examples of a long standing battle between the moral men who produce and the immoral men to live by parasitism. DESPOTISM The despot’s argument: empower elites further in order to garner favor (suck up to more successful people). Seize power and opportunity at every opportunity. Incrementally exercise pent up envy, anger, hatred, in order to gain pleasure and relief. SOCIOPATHY Sociopaths use a well documented set of tactics. They are natural liars. They will choose to lie even if the truth is just as advantageous. And once you know how lies are constructed, by using suggestion to force appeal to intuition, then you are no longer vulnerable to liars. The Sociopath’s Mind: “I must dominate, rule, punish, harm” “I have had no achievements” “I have no resources” “I am not likable or desirable” “I cannot build a following nor participate in one” “I cannot build an organization nor participate in one” “I can only use deceit and cunning because of this” “I will use deceit and cunning to self promote at all times” “I will shift locations, alliances, positions, tactics, claims, anything, and deny anything else, in order to exercise my sociopathy and related rewards” This person will always favor despotism because it is in his interests. Because there is no other means by which those without merit can exercise any agency over those others they envy, despise, and hate. THAT IS A CHAIN OF REASONING.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549826567 Timestamp) QUESTION. (SERIOUS) In the choice of the names: “The White Law” –or– “The Natural Law of European Peoples” –or– “Propertarianism” What are the costs and benefits of using each? Thoughtful rather than emotional answers please. Not what you think, but what will people think as we scale?

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1549823718 Timestamp) NOBLESSE OBLIGE: THE DUTY OF THE ELITE: A RECIPROCITY “Noblesse oblige” is generally used to imply that with wealth, power, and prestige come responsibilities. In ethical discussion, “Noblesse oblige” summarizes a moral economy wherein privilege (ability and achievement) must be balanced by duty towards those who lack such privilege ability and (achievement) or who cannot perform such duty. Finally, it has been used recently primarily to refer to public responsibilities of the rich, famous and powerful, notably to provide good examples of behaviour or to exceed minimal standards of decency. It has also been used to describe a person taking the blame for something in order to solve an issue or save someone else.