Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543163312 Timestamp) —My oath is to you, brother, to our people: all those that were, all that are, and all those that may yet come to be.—

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1543163217 Timestamp) AN OATH https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/09/08/an-oath/

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1543163217 Timestamp) AN OATH https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/09/08/an-oath/

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1543163162 Timestamp) IT BEGINS WITH THE OATH https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/16/it-begins-with-the-oath/

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1543163111 Timestamp) THE OATH

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543246953 Timestamp) —“Ever worry that the drive to establish the “Law” makes you into the abrahamic deity you claim to despise?”—Noel Fritsch Well, you know, (a) Odin was, it appears, a real person, as was aristotle. Over the centuries, we seem to have made odin into a ‘god’ in the traditional (ancestor spirit) sense, if not the abrahamic (abstract deity) sense. We have made aristotle into a hero bordering on a demigod in the traditional if not abrahamic sense. All civilizations have law-givers. The question between them is only the GRAMMAR of the law, the contents of that law, and the consequence of that law. As far as I know, I set out to write, and have written, the Law of European Peoples: The Natural Law, as a continuous, consistent, coherent extension of the Laws of Nature. In some sense, I suppose this would make me a law-giver if by some chance I am successful in influencing in the present or future such law as a reformation of the Anglo Common Law, Anglo Saxon Law, Germanic Law, Proto-germanic Law, and West Aryan Law. But that law is via negativa: like evolution – fully adaptive. Not a reflection of time and circumstance, but as eternal as the natural sciences and logics. We have incrementally prohibited parasitism and predation and now in the present, we are capable, with the knowledge we have today, of incrementally prohibiting those predations, parasitisms and harms caused by falsehood, deceits, and lies. What one does positively with the truth is a market question not a truth question. So I don’t worry about being cast as a Proxy Ancestor for Liars. And If I was lucky enough to be remembered as a Law Giver, then I can think of no greater honor that history could grant. Although I kind of doubt such a thing will or can happen, and it wouldn’t be an ambition. (b) I despise abrahamism: false promise, straw manning, undue praise, pilpul, critique and the Three Great Fictionalisms to enforce conformity by submission. In other words, the Great Lies. I do not see how ending the abrahamic dark age of lies is the same as creating a new dark age of lies. (c) deities don’t exist as other than literary and mythological characters in our narratives. It’s not that they aren’t useful to some degree. But they are clearly more useful as law givers, generals, scientists, engineers, poets and artists than deities in an era where those of us with any literacy are aware that these deities are but fictional characters for simple illiterate ignorant minds. (FWIW: I have a god by the way. I don’t know his name. But I talk to him every day. Often. He is, as I undrestand it, the god of my people, or a ‘face of’, or instance of, that god that I can comprehend. But my understanding of his existence is purely scientific: as information. That does not limit his utility, any more than imagining whether my grandmother would approve of my behavior at the dinner table. ) (d) Taking the place of the gods? The same was said about every one of the scientists and sciences and look how positive was that outcome. We are now the gods we sought to please. As were the gods of yesteryear the kings they sought to please. (e) The entire world converges (thanks to anglos largely) on the universal language of truth telling (science) which evolved (thanks to anglos largely) out of anglo law of tort, and the empirical tests and testimony under that law. So I see my work as completing the european project of converting all disciplines as subdisciplines of truthful testimony under the law. I mean, you have to find a way for justifying falsehoods, deceits, and lies, that does not at the same time say that those who require them are insufficiently human, because they are insufficiently possessed of agency, to as a consequence possess sovereignty, in display word and deed. I am perfectly ok with a multi class society where we reverse democratic and christian universalism, and return to the traditional hierarchy of Aristocracy, Nobility, Citizenry, Freemen, Serfs, Slaves, Domesticated animals, and undomesticated animals with demonstrated agency providing the privileges of rank – because this appears to be the truth. However I am equally ok with high investment education in fitness, intuition, reason, knowledge, and occupation (skill), such that these ranks are fluid under rule of law and markets. Both of these are forms of ‘truth’ expression.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543246953 Timestamp) —“Ever worry that the drive to establish the “Law” makes you into the abrahamic deity you claim to despise?”—Noel Fritsch Well, you know, (a) Odin was, it appears, a real person, as was aristotle. Over the centuries, we seem to have made odin into a ‘god’ in the traditional (ancestor spirit) sense, if not the abrahamic (abstract deity) sense. We have made aristotle into a hero bordering on a demigod in the traditional if not abrahamic sense. All civilizations have law-givers. The question between them is only the GRAMMAR of the law, the contents of that law, and the consequence of that law. As far as I know, I set out to write, and have written, the Law of European Peoples: The Natural Law, as a continuous, consistent, coherent extension of the Laws of Nature. In some sense, I suppose this would make me a law-giver if by some chance I am successful in influencing in the present or future such law as a reformation of the Anglo Common Law, Anglo Saxon Law, Germanic Law, Proto-germanic Law, and West Aryan Law. But that law is via negativa: like evolution – fully adaptive. Not a reflection of time and circumstance, but as eternal as the natural sciences and logics. We have incrementally prohibited parasitism and predation and now in the present, we are capable, with the knowledge we have today, of incrementally prohibiting those predations, parasitisms and harms caused by falsehood, deceits, and lies. What one does positively with the truth is a market question not a truth question. So I don’t worry about being cast as a Proxy Ancestor for Liars. And If I was lucky enough to be remembered as a Law Giver, then I can think of no greater honor that history could grant. Although I kind of doubt such a thing will or can happen, and it wouldn’t be an ambition. (b) I despise abrahamism: false promise, straw manning, undue praise, pilpul, critique and the Three Great Fictionalisms to enforce conformity by submission. In other words, the Great Lies. I do not see how ending the abrahamic dark age of lies is the same as creating a new dark age of lies. (c) deities don’t exist as other than literary and mythological characters in our narratives. It’s not that they aren’t useful to some degree. But they are clearly more useful as law givers, generals, scientists, engineers, poets and artists than deities in an era where those of us with any literacy are aware that these deities are but fictional characters for simple illiterate ignorant minds. (FWIW: I have a god by the way. I don’t know his name. But I talk to him every day. Often. He is, as I undrestand it, the god of my people, or a ‘face of’, or instance of, that god that I can comprehend. But my understanding of his existence is purely scientific: as information. That does not limit his utility, any more than imagining whether my grandmother would approve of my behavior at the dinner table. ) (d) Taking the place of the gods? The same was said about every one of the scientists and sciences and look how positive was that outcome. We are now the gods we sought to please. As were the gods of yesteryear the kings they sought to please. (e) The entire world converges (thanks to anglos largely) on the universal language of truth telling (science) which evolved (thanks to anglos largely) out of anglo law of tort, and the empirical tests and testimony under that law. So I see my work as completing the european project of converting all disciplines as subdisciplines of truthful testimony under the law. I mean, you have to find a way for justifying falsehoods, deceits, and lies, that does not at the same time say that those who require them are insufficiently human, because they are insufficiently possessed of agency, to as a consequence possess sovereignty, in display word and deed. I am perfectly ok with a multi class society where we reverse democratic and christian universalism, and return to the traditional hierarchy of Aristocracy, Nobility, Citizenry, Freemen, Serfs, Slaves, Domesticated animals, and undomesticated animals with demonstrated agency providing the privileges of rank – because this appears to be the truth. However I am equally ok with high investment education in fitness, intuition, reason, knowledge, and occupation (skill), such that these ranks are fluid under rule of law and markets. Both of these are forms of ‘truth’ expression.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543422155 Timestamp) WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? THE NATURAL LAW: “THE WHITE LAW” – THE LAW OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION Propertarianism refers only to the logic of Ethics. The propertarian project consists of the following FIVE collections of ideas:

    1. An explanation for the disproportionate success of the West in Bronze, Iron, and Steel Ages: We Invented Sovereignty, Truth, Rule of Law, and Complete Market Civilization which is the fastest possible means of adaptation to change – and the means by which we outpaced the rest. And explains the retaliation against western civilization by the middle peoples in those same ages – explaining the cause of the cycles of history.

    2. The completion of the scientific method, it’s restatement as the Law of Testimony, and its extension and application from the physical sciences to the social sciences, public speech, argument, and thought – thereby producing a value neutral, universal, fully commensurable, and fully decidable language of testimony (speech) – including language, logic, science, psychology, sociology, ethics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy, as well as the hard sciences and logics.

    3. A body of arguments answering the many and possibly majority of ethical, moral, and political questions, under that law. In practical effect, a body of universal law: The Natural Law of Sovereign Peoples.

    4. A Constitution that applies that completion of the scientific method, and:

    (a) Extends the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, coercion, and deceit from the market for goods and services, to the market for information (speech: display word and deed). Thereby eliminating the freedom to engage in the continuous recitation of falsehoods and the industrialization of lying that plagued the twentieth century. (b) De-Financializes, De-Politicizes, and De-Propagandizes our political orders and media, De-pseudosciences the Academy, and restores our education system and our group competitive abilities, including our unique truth telling regardless of the consequences to ourselves, the status hierarchy or the competence hierarchy. (c) Restores individual sovereignty and as a consequence, restores voluntary markets in all walks of life: association/disassociation, cooperation/non-cooperation, reproduction, production/competition, commons, and politics. (d) Restores the intergenerational family as the object of policy while retaining the individual as the object of law. As a consequence restores civil society. (e) Facilitates the development of regional differences in the production of commons by removing the federal government from all via-positiva activities, in particular the legislation of norms, and reduces it to it’s only desirable function as the insurer of last resort: Military, Judiciary of Conflicts between states, Insurer of natural disaster, and Treasury of Clearance of Currencies.

    1. The Course and Conduct of a Revolution to bring about this Reformation of the Constitution, and the saving of western civilization.

    THE LAW OF NATURE De Lege Naturae : The Law of Nature De Arte Testimonii : The Science of Testimony De Philosophia Aristocratiae : The Philosophy of Aristocracy De Scriptura Nobilitatis : The Scripture of Nobility De Professione Regum: The Art of Kings Viridis Bibliis Homines Europeii : The Green European Bible The Talmud to deceive The Bible to enslave The Koran to conquer The Manifesto to steal The General-Theory to impoverish The Critique to exterminate The Truth to make us free The Law to keep us free “THE WHITE LAW” ————————–CONTENTS————————– Metaphysics:…………….Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.) Psychology: ……………..Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends. Ethics and Morality:..Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of Non Imposition, production, and investment. Epistemology: …………Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of actionable reality. Law: …………………………Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity. Sociology: ………………..Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we combine information and calculate compatible means to the achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition, cooperation, and boycott. Politics: ……………………Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market Fascism” with tongue in cheek.) Strategy:………………….. Agency: Maximization of agency through Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism Spirituality:………………Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,…….Festival Nationalism. Aesthetics:……………….,Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty). Constitution …………….A Second American Constitution Revolution………………..The Course and Conduct of a Revolution Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543422155 Timestamp) WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? THE NATURAL LAW: “THE WHITE LAW” – THE LAW OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION Propertarianism refers only to the logic of Ethics. The propertarian project consists of the following FIVE collections of ideas:

    1. An explanation for the disproportionate success of the West in Bronze, Iron, and Steel Ages: We Invented Sovereignty, Truth, Rule of Law, and Complete Market Civilization which is the fastest possible means of adaptation to change – and the means by which we outpaced the rest. And explains the retaliation against western civilization by the middle peoples in those same ages – explaining the cause of the cycles of history.

    2. The completion of the scientific method, it’s restatement as the Law of Testimony, and its extension and application from the physical sciences to the social sciences, public speech, argument, and thought – thereby producing a value neutral, universal, fully commensurable, and fully decidable language of testimony (speech) – including language, logic, science, psychology, sociology, ethics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy, as well as the hard sciences and logics.

    3. A body of arguments answering the many and possibly majority of ethical, moral, and political questions, under that law. In practical effect, a body of universal law: The Natural Law of Sovereign Peoples.

    4. A Constitution that applies that completion of the scientific method, and:

    (a) Extends the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, coercion, and deceit from the market for goods and services, to the market for information (speech: display word and deed). Thereby eliminating the freedom to engage in the continuous recitation of falsehoods and the industrialization of lying that plagued the twentieth century. (b) De-Financializes, De-Politicizes, and De-Propagandizes our political orders and media, De-pseudosciences the Academy, and restores our education system and our group competitive abilities, including our unique truth telling regardless of the consequences to ourselves, the status hierarchy or the competence hierarchy. (c) Restores individual sovereignty and as a consequence, restores voluntary markets in all walks of life: association/disassociation, cooperation/non-cooperation, reproduction, production/competition, commons, and politics. (d) Restores the intergenerational family as the object of policy while retaining the individual as the object of law. As a consequence restores civil society. (e) Facilitates the development of regional differences in the production of commons by removing the federal government from all via-positiva activities, in particular the legislation of norms, and reduces it to it’s only desirable function as the insurer of last resort: Military, Judiciary of Conflicts between states, Insurer of natural disaster, and Treasury of Clearance of Currencies.

    1. The Course and Conduct of a Revolution to bring about this Reformation of the Constitution, and the saving of western civilization.

    THE LAW OF NATURE De Lege Naturae : The Law of Nature De Arte Testimonii : The Science of Testimony De Philosophia Aristocratiae : The Philosophy of Aristocracy De Scriptura Nobilitatis : The Scripture of Nobility De Professione Regum: The Art of Kings Viridis Bibliis Homines Europeii : The Green European Bible The Talmud to deceive The Bible to enslave The Koran to conquer The Manifesto to steal The General-Theory to impoverish The Critique to exterminate The Truth to make us free The Law to keep us free “THE WHITE LAW” ————————–CONTENTS————————– Metaphysics:…………….Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.) Psychology: ……………..Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends. Ethics and Morality:..Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of Non Imposition, production, and investment. Epistemology: …………Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of actionable reality. Law: …………………………Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity. Sociology: ………………..Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we combine information and calculate compatible means to the achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition, cooperation, and boycott. Politics: ……………………Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market Fascism” with tongue in cheek.) Strategy:………………….. Agency: Maximization of agency through Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism Spirituality:………………Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,…….Festival Nationalism. Aesthetics:……………….,Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty). Constitution …………….A Second American Constitution Revolution………………..The Course and Conduct of a Revolution Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543451370 Timestamp) WHAT ABOUT SLAVERY? —“Curt; Are you opposed to slavery?”— Um. “Opposed” is an opinion. My opinion is irrelevant. My job is the Law. This is how I understand The Law: If you mean voluntary or indentured servitude in its many forms, then no, it’s within the law. It’s just a contract. In fact I would advocate for its restoration since it’s just a good way of absorbing labor and taking good care of our people who are less able. I mean, room, clothing, board, healthcare is expensive enough and paying someone to maintain a household unnecessarily isn’t good. There are plenty of people for whom household management is not a preference but a burden. If you mean civic-slavery (military service) then of course I advocate it – and I don’t think militaries can function otherwise. If you mean prisoner-slavery (putting prisoners to work on the commons) then yes, of course, I advocate as much of it as possible. On the other hand the law recommends a return to as much capital punishment as possible. But If you mean chattel slavery (what most people think of) the Law would say that it is always harmful to your people and their genome (unless you sterilize them), it is is too expensive for the meagre returns, and it violates the one law, with which we must force those able to transcend to do so, rather than leave them as undomesticated wild animals so to speak. In general, chattel slavery is bad. It’s worse if its with aliens. It’s much worse if it’s with devolutionary aliens. And it’s much, much worse if it’s common whatsoever. The externalities are some of the worst possible. Slavery was an agrarian utility that is no longer of any utility.