Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • Jun 28, 2019, 9:20 AM —“Are you familiar with Richard Maybury … He’s famous

    Jun 28, 2019, 9:20 AM
    —“Are you familiar with Richard Maybury … He’s famous for “do all you have agreed to do and, do not encroach on other persons or their property” “—

    It’s good stuff. Great writer. Talent for high school (normie) prose. Probably should be required reading for sophomore year of high school.

    He’s missing truth and duty. but yes.
    1. Tell the truth regardless of cost
    2. Make few promises and always fulfill them.
    3. Impose no costs upon the demonstrated interests of others.
    4. Exhaust interpersonal forgiveness before retaliation, restitution, punishment, death, or war.
    5. Do your normative, economic, civic(policing commons), judicial(Jury), emergency(disasters), and military duty.

    Four Agreements
    1. Be impeccable with your word.
    2. Don’t take anything personally.
    3. Don’t make assumptions.
    4. Always do your best. ”

    Golden and Silver rules.
    G. Do unto others as you would have done to you (equalitarian reciprocity)
    S. No not unto others as they would not have done unto them.(egalitarian reciprocity)
    P’s Oath is optimum.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 03:09:26 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426277725407169

  • Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s b

    Jun 29, 2019, 8:02 AM
    I had an insight yesterday that’s bothering me, and it’s bothering me because it’s true.

    the amoral and immoral have an advantage over the moral if we let them.

    The needs for sun tzu’s, aristotle’s machiavelli’s, doolittle’s and martial epistemology, to counter the habituation of morality – while at the same time, the return on the value of the habituation of morality.

    Taleb’s (false) argument about IQ, because he’s talking about amorality and opportunism (semitism), not intelligence and capital accumulation (europeanism).

    The reason the jews have benefitted from polyethicalism (amoralism), so consistently even independent of ashkenazi distributions – vs the problem the english equivalent (“Anglicans, Tories” – the genetic superiority of the british ‘middle'[upper middle]) class at home and in the empire (opportunity diaspora).

    The value of understanding Propertarianism, which, says that we must build that moral civ by due diligence in prosecuting the immoral. The value of P in understanding that much of what appears Amoral is Immoral.

    In other words our strength is our weakness if the “commercial state” (what we have today) or the commercial sector, or the ‘religious’ sector, expand beyond national means into consumption of the accumulated capital in all its forms, including those opportunities that may not be seized amorally.

    In other words, there is an error in our demarcation between moral amoral and immoral commercial, political, religious activity.

    P fixes this implicitly but I don’t TALK about it to provide clarity explicitly.
    Edit

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:59:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426238079433292

  • CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM I am, first, and

    CHOOSE ARYAN CHRISTIAN OF KIN OR SEMITIC CHRISTIAN AGAINST THEM

    I am, first, and foremost:
    1) An Aryan(The primacy of man, heroism, excellence, reciprocity, truth before face, aristocratic egalitarianism),
    2) Aristotelian(Naturalism, Truth regardless of cost), an;d
    3) Heathen (Debt only to Nature and Ancestors, Ward of Nature).

    I cannot be those things, if I practice the supernatural over the natural, the irrational over the rational, and false debt over existential debt.

    I can however, be:
    4) a scientific and rational christian, if I have adopted the teaching of christianity:
    i) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.
    ii) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.
    iii) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost,
    iiii) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    These are truths. And no claim of truth nor good can require I:
    a) abandon the difference between man and animal by abandoning reason;
    b) claim belief in a falsehood;
    c) owe debt, loyalty, or fealty to other than my kith and kin.

    Yet it is Abrahamic Semitism that asks
    (a) abandon reason,
    (b) claim belief in falsehood, and
    (c) owe debt loyalty or fealty to other than my kith and kin.

    The Semitic technique of Abrahamic lying is:
    (a) False promise(lying),
    (b) Sophism(lying),
    (c) Straw Manning(lying),
    (d) Critique (lying), GSRRM(avoiding truth),
    (e) Denial(lying),
    (f) in exchange for ‘membership’ in a false family whose common interests is propagation of the lie, false promise, sophism, straw manning, critique, GSRRM, and denial.

    There is no difference between:
    (a) Judaism, (c) Christianity, (c) Islam and;
    (b) Marx-Freud-Frankfurt-Derrida et al: the marxists, socialists, psychologists, sociologists, feminists, postmodernists, denialists, and politically corrects (truth suppression)

    The First wave of Abrahamists created
    (a) Judaism to undermine,
    (b) Christianity to undermine further, and
    (c) Islam to conquer the undermined and weakened.
    … Against Aristocracy Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and Reason.

    The Second wave of Abrahamists replaced religion of the supernatural false promise, sophism, critique, and denial, with two attempts:
    (a) first Abrahamic pseudoscientific false promises sophism critique, and denial in marxism-socialism-freudianism-feminism.
    (b) then the Abrahamic sophistic false promises sophism critique, and denial with postmodernism, neo-liberalism, and political correctness.
    … Against Reciprocity, Law, Commerce, and (Darwin!).

    (continued…)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 02:47:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102426191435493947

  • ASK. SEEK TO UNDERSTAND. STRAW MANNING AND DISAPPROVAL AND IGNORANCE ARE NOT REC

    ASK. SEEK TO UNDERSTAND. STRAW MANNING AND DISAPPROVAL AND IGNORANCE ARE NOT RECIPROCITY NOR ARGUMENTS

    We are not equals.
    We are only compatible.
    We are only compatible under reciprocity.

    Truth before face.
    Responsibility before respect.
    Outcome before experience (feelings).

    Meet argument on equal grounds.
    Demand Question instead of Criticism.
    And Punish Laziness and Pride in Ignorance.

    I work for the OUTCOME of the peoples of the world, and there is no reason I should tolerate straw manning, critique, or pretense of argument.

    Ask, don’t tell or criticize what you don’t understand in order to defend your lack of ability, lack of knowledge, lack of work.

    Seek to understand, by asking those who understand to educate you in reciprocity, not to force those who understand to educate you in defense against your ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:41:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424751126705861

  • “When you walk in the path of natural law the light becomes blinding”—George C

    —“When you walk in the path of natural law the light becomes blinding”—George Carvlin

    ( A little poetic for my tastes, but the sentiment is correct…) 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 16:03:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149348448132636672

  • Amateurish nonsense. When there is a good criticism of P-Law I’ll share it. Ther

    Amateurish nonsense. When there is a good criticism of P-Law I’ll share it. There won’t be. So I won’t have to. The only good criticisms are (a) cost of forcing the legal profession to adopt it, (b) choice of proposed policy under it, (c) the possibility of revolt to enact it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-09 20:49:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148695589934239744

    Reply addressees: @FourteenHans

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148693578945724417

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1148693578945724417

  • Herd Strategy(Offspring, Numbers, Dysgenic ) <= Female Cognitive Bias <= Psychos

    Herd Strategy(Offspring, Numbers, Dysgenic ) <= Female Cognitive Bias <= Psychosis <- Solipsism <- Empathy(feel) <— Reciprocity —> Sympathy(think) -> Analytic -> Autistic => Male Cognition => Pack Strategy (Resources, Quality, Eugenic).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-26 17:27:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143933879172194304

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143816226159910912

    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Women’s greater support for censorship of “hate speech” is largely due to their greater susceptibility to sexual disgust. https://t.co/uKHGPjtAQ8 It is also linked to lower rating of freedom of speech: https://t.co/qbD2dfvBwr https://t.co/FgcTgZ0t7h

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143816226159910912

  • natural law applied results in natural aristocracy

    natural law applied results in natural aristocracy

    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-25 13:55:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143518047958904832

  • So try this experiment. remove reciprocity from that list. What disappears? Ever

    So try this experiment. remove reciprocity from that list. What disappears? Everything is a derivative of reciprocity. In other words, they are the only means of producing reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-25 13:25:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143510463763886083

    Reply addressees: @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143509306899337216

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143509306899337216

  • In the west we developed this technology (truth, duty, reciprocity, sovereignty)

    In the west we developed this technology (truth, duty, reciprocity, sovereignty) are our origins as cattle raiders (horsemen, chairotters, vikings, pirates, etc) since raiding was an entrepreneurial exercise.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-25 13:18:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143508849900564482

    Reply addressees: @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1143508482051727365

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @OrienPermu If you go thru the world history of the development of law, (not just western) you’ll find disputes (tort) are decided by reciprocity given the structure of production and state of development of the people. …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1143508482051727365

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @OrienPermu If you go thru the world history of the development of law, (not just western) you’ll find disputes (tort) are decided by reciprocity given the structure of production and state of development of the people. …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1143508482051727365