Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the ob

    I can’t tell if you’re trolling, intellectually dishonest, or overlooking the obvious. How can one claim action in defense of, and retaliation for, ir-reciprocity, is an aggression? How can one construct a condition of sovereignty and reciprocity, otherwise? Wishful thinking?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 23:33:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187512359084011527

    Reply addressees: @NSKinsella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187491418819969030

    IN REPLY TO:

    @NSKinsella

    @curtdoolittle So, you’re in favor of aggression? Hitting innocent people in the head with bricks, for example? Or not? Just to be clear.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187491418819969030

  • Libertarianism is a sedating pseudo-moral sophism for those to ignorant, weak an

    Libertarianism is a sedating pseudo-moral sophism for those to ignorant, weak and cowardly, to organise militarily to create rule of law by reciprocity,under demonstrated interests, enumerated as property, and to insure it equally, producing a condition of sovereignty. Liars all.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 21:58:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187488641469288454

    Reply addressees: @NSKinsella

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187441168214380544

    IN REPLY TO:

    @NSKinsella

    I should probably inaugurate The Libertarian Theory Podcast. I know it would be poplar. And I don’t even want to make money. So no ads. But then, why bother. Nevermind.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187441168214380544

  • AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY – AND ITS FUTURE – IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW – T

    AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY – AND ITS FUTURE

    – IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW –

    THE EUROPEAN BRONZE AGE
    1) The European IE Customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491319228131639&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 21:22:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187117080103063552

  • It’s antithetical to the female intuition which decides by approval or disapprov

    It’s antithetical to the female intuition which decides by approval or disapproval and proportionality instead of truth falsehood and reciprocity – b/c in the end those are men’s problems: production and war. Econ is counterintuitive to her nervous system unless to redistribute.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 20:42:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187107003300225032

    Reply addressees: @TheEconomist

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186821609627275264

    IN REPLY TO:

    @TheEconomist

    Economics is even less popular among girls than maths https://t.co/vorokeIWPZ

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186821609627275264

  • WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREI

    WHAT IF ANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT RESISTED OUR TRUTH TELLING, RECIPROCITY, AND SOVEREIGNTY?

    What Group, Nation, Civilization, Or Religion, has not done everything in its power to resist the British Empirical and Scientific revolution in epistemic, psychological, social, economic, and political social sciences? Everyone’s just fine with the logical and material: math, accounting, medicine, and technology that assists them in consumption, but everyone has resisted Individual Heroism, Testimonial Truth, Truth Before Face, Civic Duty, Civic Production of Commons, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Rule of Law of Property and Tort, an Independent Judiciary, Markets in Everything, the Absolute Nuclear Family, and personal responsibility and accountability, and the eugenics that result from all of the above.. So every group has wanted to increase consumption, or seek power, but who has done anything other than fight against truth, reciprocity, meritocracy, a

    The church throughout our history; the monarchies until the 17th century; The French in the 18th century, the Marxists in the 19th century, The Jews last century, the jews and russians, and now the muslims this century, a repeat of the chinese totalitarian ambitions in this century, a repeat of the french totalitarian ambitions in europe this century.

    Everyone wants consumption.

    No one wants responsibility.

    Yet we made consumption possible because we took responsibility.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 19:54:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGIN OF LAW —“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds and endless ven

    THE ORIGIN OF LAW

    —“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds and endless vengeance in a society based on rule of natural law(reciprocity)?”—Sietze Bosman @fryskefilosoof
    Curt Doolittle… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=491233008140261&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 18:36:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187075335097126918

  • I don’t understand… wait… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantie

    I don’t understand… wait… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 18:32:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187074362400268288

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187060555418345473

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187060555418345473

  • AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY – AND ITS FUTURE – IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW – T

    AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY – AND ITS FUTURE

    – IE-EUROPEAN CUSTOMARY LAW –

    THE EUROPEAN BRONZE AGE

    1) The European IE Customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected Kings.

    2) The proto germanic customary law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings

    THE MEDITERRANEAN AGE

    3) The Greek customary Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and elected kings.

    4) The Roman Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy.

    – THE FIRST SEMITIC DARK AGE –

    FALL OF ROME AND END OF MEDITERRANEAN TRADE

    5) The Germanic Continental Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy, and inherited Monarchy.

    6) Germanic Rule of Law, of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy.

    7) The Anglo Saxon Law of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – (Families)

    THE NORMAN CONQUEST: UNIFICATION INTO ENGLISH COMMON LAW

    8) ~1066 – Attempted unification of differences in anglo saxon law, and norman ‘privilege’. Primarily concerned with the conflcit between customary (folk) law and privilege.

    9) THE NOBILITY’S VETO – THE MAGNA CARTA RESTORATION OF RIGHTS

    ~1215 – Magna Carta 1215. Restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy

    THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR – THE RESTORATION OF RIGHTS

    1) ~1664 – The English Common Law and the British Constitution, restoring sovereignty, reciprocity

    THE AMERICAN WAR OF SECESSION

    2) ~1776 – The Declaration, The Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation

    3) ~1789 – The Constitution, and Bill of RIghts – restoring Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy – but failing to ARTICULATE them.

    THE FIRST (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION

    4) ~1812 – The North’s Attempted Secession over the war of 1812 with England.

    THE SECOND (MAJOR) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR OF SECESSION

    4) ~1865- The Constitution of Oppression of the Southern States over the south’s secession and control of westward expansion.

    – THE SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE –

    THE THIRD (AVOIDED) AMERICAN CIVIL WAR

    5) ~1933 – The Left’s Attempt At Conquest, imitating the semitic conquest of Russia, by FDR.

    THE FOURTH AMERICAN CIVIL WAR (SECOND SEMITIC DARK AGE)

    6) ~1965 – The Constitution of Oppression of Ethnic Europeans by the reversal of the demand for integration into the rule of law, christian ethics, market meritocracy, and the self sufficiency of the absolute nuclear family – and the undermining of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy

    -THE RESTORATION-

    THE FIFTH CIVIL WAR (THE RESTORATION)

    7) ~2020 – The Restoration of the Constitution Natural Law, and the Retaliation against the Second Attempt At Destruction of Western Civilization – by restoration of Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Jury, Tripartism, and Market Meritocracy.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 17:22:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGIN OF INSTITUTIONAL LAW —“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds a

    THE ORIGIN OF INSTITUTIONAL LAW

    —“Dear mr Doolittle, How to avoid bloodfeuds and endless vengeance in a society based on rule of natural law(reciprocity)?”—Sietze Bosman @fryskefilosoof

    I don’t understand… wait… ok. Here…

    Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties.

    It’s uncommon knowledge that the origin of all customary and political law is the resolution of disputes between families or clans, because of the excessive cost and consequence of retaliation cycles (feuds). As such, the polity insures peaceful settlement w/ law, court, jury.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 14:36:00 UTC

  • Request Peace, Prepare for War. 😉 At least, for those of us who prefer a ‘War o

    Request Peace, Prepare for War. 😉
    At least, for those of us who prefer a ‘War of Retaliation and Restitution’ we prefer the moral license for ‘excesses’ granted by refusal of mutually beneficial terms. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 01:29:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186816852720267264

    Reply addressees: @MAGAPatriotNana @AnnCoulter @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186815013823975425

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186815013823975425