Theme: Reciprocity

  • (NLI Micro Lesson) Article I.IV: The Natural Law Section: Terms of Cooperation T

    (NLI Micro Lesson)
    Article I.IV: The Natural Law
    Section: Terms of Cooperation
    There exists only one Natural Law of Cooperation and that is Reciprocity; where reciprocity preserves sovereignty, and sovereignty preserves self determination, and self determination preserves individual and group evolutionary computation, and evolutionary computation defeats the dark forces of time, ignorance, and the risks of flora, fauna, mankind, geology, climate, sun, solar system, galactic, and universal disgregard for our condition, survival, persistence or existence.

    ANALYSIS
    The paragraph you provided presents a series of philosophical and metaphysical assertions that connect several broad concepts. Let’s break it down for clarity and examine its components:

    “There exists only one Natural Law of Cooperation and that is Reciprocity”:This statement posits that reciprocity (mutual exchange for mutual benefit) is the foundational principle or ‘natural law’ governing cooperative behavior. In various philosophical and ethical frameworks, reciprocity is indeed considered a key element in fostering cooperation among individuals and groups.

    “…where reciprocity preserves sovereignty, and sovereignty preserves self determination”:Here, the claim is made that reciprocity leads to the preservation of sovereignty (the authority of a state to govern itself or another state), and in turn, sovereignty ensures self-determination (the process by which a group of people, usually possessing a certain degree of national consciousness, form their own state and choose their own government).
    This linkage suggests a flow from interpersonal or organizational ethics (reciprocity) to political theory (sovereignty and self-determination).

    “…and self determination preserves individual and group evolutionary computation”:The term “evolutionary computation” is generally used in the context of algorithms and artificial intelligence and refers to problem-solving systems based on the principles of biological evolution.
    In this statement, it seems to metaphorically suggest that self-determination contributes to the development or progress (evolution) of individuals and groups, possibly in a cultural or societal sense.

    “…and evolutionary computation defeats the dark forces of time, ignorance, and the risks of flora, fauna, mankind, geology, climate, sun, solar system, galactic, and universal disregard for our condition, survival, persistence or existence.”:This part of the sentence appears to be a broad, metaphorical assertion that the evolutionary progress of humanity (in knowledge, culture, technology, etc.) combats various existential risks and challenges.
    These challenges are described in a sweeping range, from ecological and geological to cosmic, suggesting a philosophical view of human progress as a defense against the indifferent nature of the universe.

    Overall Interpretation:
    The paragraph is a philosophical statement linking ethical principles (reciprocity) with political concepts (sovereignty and self-determination) and extending this link to a broader metaphysical claim about human progress and survival in the face of various existential threats.
    It employs a mixture of concrete terms from social and political theory with more metaphorical language related to evolution and cosmology.
    The narrative is grand and sweeping, encompassing a wide range of ideas from different fields of thought.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-31 14:15:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741463028694941696

  • RT @erikbrus25: @sauniere @curtdoolittle Concurrent Common Natural Law (clip): C

    RT @erikbrus25: @sauniere @curtdoolittle Concurrent Common Natural Law (clip):

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eVbPkJLJm-E&t=114s

    Concurrent, Common, Natural Law:…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-30 09:14:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1741024931826307464

  • All frauds, thieves, liars, and free ridiers hate me. 😉 Truth isn’t their frien

    All frauds, thieves, liars, and free ridiers hate me. 😉 Truth isn’t their friend.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-28 01:17:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1740180196807053524

    Reply addressees: @BlauGloriole @quilty_dan

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1740157866324172926

  • CHATGPT EXPLAINS PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW) (Chat GPT getting better) I fed C

    CHATGPT EXPLAINS PROPERTARIANISM (NATURAL LAW)
    (Chat GPT getting better)

    I fed ChatGPT4 the explanation of the methodology and asked it to explain it. 😉

    ChatGPT
    Propertarianism, a concept developed by Curt Doolittle, aims to extend and complete the scientific method, applying it not just to the physical sciences but also to the human sciences, including ethics, law, and economics.

    Key Points of Propertarianism:

    Completion of the Scientific Method: Propertarianism is described as the completion of the scientific method. It extends the scientific method to all disciplines, including those traditionally considered “soft sciences” like sociology, psychology, and politics.

    A New Vocabulary and Grammar: It introduces a new vocabulary and grammar, which Doolittle compares to a programming language for describing the world. This new language is intended to provide a system of measurement across all human disciplines, akin to mathematics in its precision.

    Application to Social and Political Conflict: Propertarianism is also presented as a tool to understand and potentially resolve current social and political conflicts. It offers a framework for analyzing these conflicts through a scientific lens.

    Propertarianism as a Bridge: The methodology acts as a bridge between a programming language and ordinary language, similar to how logic bridges mathematics and language.

    Methodology Similar to Programming and Law: In its approach, Propertarianism uses constant terms, variable terms, and complete sentences in a way that resembles programming or legal contract analysis, allowing for rigorous testing of statements.

    Universal Commensurability: The system aims for universal commensurability across all sciences, enabling concrete statements about soft sciences in the same way as hard sciences.

    Understanding Western Success and Decline: Propertarianism seeks to explain the West’s historical success and modern decline, proposing solutions to restore Western civilization.

    Primary Innovations and Applications: It emphasizes precision in truthful speech, addressing contemporary problems like lying and deceit, with primary applications in law.

    A System of Measurement for Reciprocity: It uses a concept called “Property-in-Toto” as a measurement system for testing reciprocity within ethics and law.

    Testimonialism: Doolittle suggests that a more accurate term for his work might be “Testimonialism” or “The Science of Testimony,” emphasizing its focus on truthful, reciprocal speech.

    In summary, Propertarianism is presented as a comprehensive philosophical and methodological system that seeks to apply scientific rigor and precision to all areas of human knowledge, with a particular focus on improving the understanding and management of social, legal, and political issues. It proposes a structured, mathematical-like approach to language and thought, aiming to bring clarity and testability to the soft sciences and human discourse.

    CURTD
    Please explain the mothodology discussed in this text

    ChatGPT
    The methodology described in the text, central to Propertarianism (or Testimonialism as the author also refers to it), is complex and multifaceted. It aims to apply the rigor of the scientific method to all areas of human knowledge, especially the “soft sciences” like sociology, psychology, and politics. Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of this methodology:

    Completion and Extension of the Scientific Method: The methodology extends the scientific method beyond the physical sciences to include human sciences. This involves applying empirical, operational, and falsifiable approaches to areas traditionally seen as subjective or interpretive.

    Development of a New Vocabulary and Grammar: A significant aspect of this methodology is the creation of a new vocabulary and grammar, likened to a programming language for describing the world. This language is structured to enable precise and measurable statements across all disciplines.

    Operational Language: The methodology emphasizes the use of operational language, where terms are defined through actions and consequences. This approach is designed to reduce ambiguity and improve the clarity and testability of statements.

    Procedural Falsification in All Dimensions of Human Perception: The text suggests using procedural falsification (a concept from the philosophy of science) in all dimensions of human perception. This means rigorously testing hypotheses and statements for validity and reliability across different aspects of human experience.

    Use of Disambiguation, Serialization, and Operationalization: The methodology involves disambiguating terms, serializing them into ordered spectrums, and defining them operationally. This process aims to create precise units of measurement for abstract concepts, particularly in moral and ethical discussions.

    Focus on Reciprocity and Property-in-Toto: The methodology uses the concept of “Property-in-Toto” as a system of measurement for ethics and law. This concept seeks to quantify and measure reciprocity in human interactions.

    Application to Legal and Ethical Frameworks: The methodology is not just theoretical but has practical applications in law and ethics. It proposes a system for creating more precise and less ambiguous legal and ethical frameworks.

    Testimonial Truth: A key focus is on truthful speech – termed “testimonial truth.” This concept involves making statements that are not only factually accurate but also free from deception, with a commitment to rectification if proven otherwise.

    Comprehensive Application: The methodology aims for a comprehensive application across various fields – from psychology to sociology, politics, and economics – intending to create a more rigorous and scientific approach to these disciplines.

    Problem-Solving in Contemporary Issues: The text suggests that this methodology can help address contemporary issues, including social and political conflicts, by applying a more structured and scientific approach to understanding these problems.

    In essence, the methodology proposed in Propertarianism is an ambitious attempt to bring the precision and testability of the hard sciences to all fields of human inquiry, particularly those involving human behavior and society. It seeks to create a universal, value-neutral, and formal operational logic and method for all disciplines, facilitating clearer and more effective communication, understanding, and problem-solving.

    CURTD
    Please explain Operational Language as mentinoned in the document in detail.

    ChatGPT
    Operational language, as mentioned in the context of Propertarianism (or Testimonialism), is a key component of its methodology. This concept is critical to understanding how this approach seeks to bring precision and clarity to various fields, especially those related to human behavior and social sciences. Here’s a detailed explanation of operational language:

    Definition and Purpose
    Action-Based Descriptions: Operational language focuses on defining concepts and statements in terms of specific actions, processes, or operations. This means describing things not in abstract terms but in concrete, observable actions or sequences of actions.

    Reduction of Ambiguity: By defining terms operationally, the language aims to reduce ambiguity and vagueness. This is achieved by detailing the exact procedures or actions that a term entails, making it clear and unambiguous.

    Enhanced Clarity and Testability: Operational definitions enhance the clarity and testability of statements. In scientific and philosophical discourse, a statement or hypothesis defined operationally can be more easily tested or empirically verified.

    Implementation in Propertarianism
    System of Measurement: In Propertarianism, operational language is used to create a system of measurement for abstract concepts, particularly in ethics and law. It seeks to quantify and measure concepts like reciprocity and morality through specific, action-based definitions.

    Serialization and Disambiguation: The methodology involves disambiguating and serializing terms. This means organizing related concepts into a spectrum or series and defining each term in the series through specific actions, thereby differentiating them clearly.

    Examples and Applications
    Moral and Ethical Concepts: For example, operational language might define ethical concepts like ‘good’ or ‘right’ in terms of specific actions and their consequences on others, rather than leaving them as abstract ideals.

    Legal and Contractual Language: In law, operational language can make legal documents more precise, defining terms and conditions through clear, action-based language to reduce misinterpretation and ambiguity.

    Scientific Hypotheses: In science, operational definitions are critical for testing hypotheses. For instance, instead of saying “X increases happiness,” an operational definition would specify what is meant by ‘happiness’ in measurable terms (like ‘increased self-reported happiness scores on a specific validated scale’).

    In summary, operational language in the context of Propertarianism is about defining concepts in a precise, action-based manner to enhance clarity, reduce ambiguity, and make statements more empirically testable. This approach is part of a broader effort to apply scientific rigor to the analysis of human behavior, social structures, and even ethical and legal systems.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-26 18:44:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1739718921907847168

  • THE FUTURE OF MORALITY REQUIES EDUCATION AND TRAINING – HUMANS OVERSIMPLIFY OTHE

    THE FUTURE OF MORALITY REQUIES EDUCATION AND TRAINING – HUMANS OVERSIMPLIFY OTHERWISE

    In the future, under NLI’s Natural Law of Cooperation, we would expect children to learn and adults to practice asking questions seeking to undersetand moral differences and decide accordingly rather than asserting opinions – and moreover opinions – as presumptive truths.

    And moral differences in what context? To yourself? Or a mate, or a family member, or a close friend, or someone in your workplace, or someone in interpersonal commerce, or someone in the general commons of society, or someone in politics, or someone who is an ally, or a potential ally, or a new introduction to an alien context, or even an anemy?

    Humans try to simplify morality as they try to simply everything so that they don’t have to think and can just react from intuition and emotion. But this is the morality of the hunter gatherer band – of proto-humans not modern humans.

    Instead, to train ourselves to not oversimplify, especially the moral, we require education and repetitive practice, so that we categorize circumstances accordingly.

    The most simple among us confuse the moral wants of their own (solipsism), or those of the family (lesser solipsism) with the moral wants and needs of contexts where each of us has less value to one another and less want and need of compromise with one another.

    So moral obligations differ with proximity of the releations between us.

    That does not mean we cannot alway start from treating all others as kin (near relations) which is the most optimistic relation possible – it’s the foundation and nearly the sole purpose of christian religion.

    However, that does not mean we should expect reciprocity in that optimistic relation, or that others share that optimism.

    Instead we should recognize that such optimism is merely a pragmatism that our civilization has discovered, and that all people in all cultures ac pragmatically according the the pragmatic mmorals of their civilizations, cultures, and classes.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-20 15:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737495327404376064

  • We are rigorously working to state the natural law and how it legitimizes monarc

    We are rigorously working to state the natural law and how it legitimizes monarchies under rule of law of natural law, cabinets, and parliaments, and criminalizing any attempt to displace the institution of monarchy.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-20 00:43:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737272357532651919

    Reply addressees: @anderstegn

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1737270639789064283

  • “Q: @curtdoolittle: Maybe you can help me with something that drives me nuts. Wh

    –“Q: @curtdoolittle: Maybe you can help me with something that drives me nuts. When people are using the word Human dignity. What are we talking about?”–

    Great Question
    Well, of course, your question is logical in the anglosphere because we are logical and scientific where the european is less evolved and more rational and philosophical. (ie: Kantian)

    Comparing the European concept of “human dignity” with the Anglo-American emphasis on “individual sovereignty” highlights some fundamental philosophical and legal differences in how these societies conceptualize rights and freedoms.

    European Concept of Human Dignity
    Abstract and Holistic: Human dignity in European legal thought is indeed more abstract. It’s seen as an intrinsic quality that every human possesses, deserving of respect and protection. This concept is rooted in philosophical and moral traditions, especially those influenced by Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, which argues that humans, being rational agents, must always be treated as ends in themselves, not merely as means.

    Collective Orientation: The concept often leads to a more collective approach in policy-making, emphasizing social welfare, equality, and communal harmony.

    Flexible Application: Its abstract nature allows for a flexible interpretation, adapting to different societal changes and ethical dilemmas, especially in areas like bioethics, privacy, and social justice.

    Anglo-American Emphasis on Individual Sovereignty
    Concrete and Individualistic: In contrast, the Anglo-American legal tradition, especially in the United States, emphasizes individual sovereignty. This principle is more concrete, focusing on explicit rights and freedoms of individuals, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to privacy.

    Rights-Based Approach: This tradition often interprets rights in the context of limiting state interference and protecting individual choices and liberties.

    Objective Standards: The emphasis is more on clear, objective tests for rights violations, often grounded in constitutional and statutory law.

    Comparison and Contrast
    Abstract vs. Concrete: European human dignity is more abstract, serving as a guiding principle rather than a specific right, whereas American individual sovereignty is more concrete and directly enforceable through specific rights.

    Flexibility vs. Clarity: The abstract nature of human dignity allows for broad interpretation, which can be seen as both a strength (in its flexibility) and a weakness (in its potential vagueness). In contrast, the American approach’s clarity provides strong legal protections but can be less adaptable to complex moral and social issues.

    Collective Good vs. Individual Rights: The European view tends to balance individual rights with the collective good, while the American view prioritizes individual rights even at the expense of broader social welfare.

    Philosophical Foundations: The European approach is heavily influenced by a humanistic and often welfare-oriented philosophy, while the American approach is rooted in classical liberalism and individualism.

    Why the Abstract Approach?
    The European use of a more abstract term like “human dignity” reflects a different legal and philosophical tradition. It allows for a broader interpretation that can adapt to various ethical challenges and social changes. While it might seem ‘fuzzy’, it provides a foundational principle that informs the interpretation and application of specific laws, aiming to capture a wider range of human experiences and values that might not be easily translated into objective tests.

    In Conclusion:
    While the European approach with its abstract principles might seem less clear-cut compared to the Anglo-American focus on concrete individual rights, it reflects a different but equally valid legal and philosophical tradition that prioritizes a holistic view of human well-being and social cohesion.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @Dontcar25448459


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-19 00:36:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736908241261477888

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736898985820827686

  • (NLI New Constitutional Section Under Strategic Policy) (a) define sovereignty t

    (NLI New Constitutional Section Under Strategic Policy)
    (a) define sovereignty to include reciprocity
    (b) states only granted sovereignty if they practice reciprocity
    (c) weapons of mass destruction (nuclear and whatever else emerges) cannot be tolerated in the possession of those who don’t practice reciprocal sovereignty.
    (d) AFAIK all states that do permit authoritariansm without the check of poppulsim appear to practice irreciprocity regarding sovereignty.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-18 17:33:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736801977521057792

  • Robert, (all): I would argue free ‘truthful, reciprocal, testifiable speech’ – w

    Robert, (all):
    I would argue free ‘truthful, reciprocal, testifiable speech’ – where truthful requires that truth and reciprocity claims are ‘testifiable’, is the hole in the law.
    And that this hole in the law exists becuause until the past decade or so, we could not test, in the constraints of the court, whether a statement was truthful and tesifiably so.
    Plugging that hole in the law would effectively eliminate all leftist speech, since it always and everywhere consists of violations of truth,reciprocity, and testifiability.
    As for the moral questions, if we acknowldge that the intergenerational family is of higher policy and law priority than the individual’s personal fulfillment of their instincts, intuitions, and desires – then all the two socially offensive questions positied in the graphic: satan worship and trans story hour that you posted would be crimes, but the rest would not.

    Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-17 14:02:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736386388768014336

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1736262317791137887

  • The ‘frame’ is irrelevant. It’s just a fact. The left makes a claim on others wi

    The ‘frame’ is irrelevant. It’s just a fact. The left makes a claim on others without compensation whereas the right makes no uncompensated claim against others.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-12-13 23:31:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735080137769578999

    Reply addressees: @AgentParanoi99

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1735005284442009803