Theme: Reciprocity

  • ONE CHILD POLICY Prohibiting redistribution to you, without exchange for your st

    ONE CHILD POLICY

    Prohibiting redistribution to you, without exchange for your sterilization has nothing to do with the state – just restitution for your act of aggression.

    So It’s entirely to do with (a) violation of the natural law of reciprocity we call tort, as measured by that system of measurement we call property. (b) the imposition of costs on the rest of us in the polity for pollution of the genetic, normative, institutional informational, and aesthetic commons (c) and your failure of due diligence forcing us into hazard for your breeding without the ability to pay for raising your offspring, therefore forcing us to do so instead – theft.

    It’s just non-aggression. Don’t aggress. Don’t steal. Don’t impose costs on us. It’s a matter of property and law and has nothing to do with the state.

    Instead, we prohibit the state from conspiring with you in the conduct of your crimes against us.

    Now, conversely most people can’t have kids because the state is taxing the middle class out of high investment parenting in order to redistribute reproduction to low investment parenting in the genetically unrecoverable underclasses.

    Stop trying to conspire to steal.

    You too.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-03 11:47:00 UTC

  • Eugenics in P-Law

    Eugenics in P-Law https://propertarianism.com/2019/11/02/eugenics-in-p-law/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-02 02:08:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190450454452412416

  • Eugenics in P-Law

    (Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)

  • Eugenics in P-Law

    (Curt Doolittle) The only eugenic process Natural Law relies upon is markets. in other words, if you (your family) is self supporting, and not engaging in irreciprocity, we have no other means of testing your fitness other than demonstrated fitness. If you (your family) is not self supporting, an engages in irreciprocity, no matter your excuse, then you are in fact, demonstrating unfitness. (Bill Joslin) Fitness being akin to “good” – anything not unfit, is fit. Fitness remains undecidable (only demonstrable) because of the causal density and unpredictability of future outcomes. But unfitness remains a provisional known (a known subject to being updated with new information). This the demarcation between HARD eugenics (attempting direct control over natural eugenics) and SOFT P-Eugenics would be “anything not unfit remains fit (a fitness candidate) – or rather, we P-eugenics are achieved by NOT practicing dysgenics. (Curt Doolittle) P-law is via negativa, meaning do not reproduce dysgenically, it is not via-positiva, meaning culling of people. It does leave open the possibility of termination for catastrophic birth defects. We don’t answer the question of abortion because it is undecidable under law. It is only decidable within a polity. P-law does not prohibit genetic innovation (Transhuanism) as long as it reversible in the next generation and warranteed. TESTOSTERONE (Curt Doolittle) The generational sink in testosterone levels as far as I know, is almost entirely due to failure to exercise and engage in dominance play, and can be restored by physical activity – we know this because we see people do it every day. THere is some negativity to BPA and other chemicals but tis is as easily rectified as requiring all foods to be shipped (more expensively, and less environmentally costly ) in glass containers. (Bill Joslin) Drop in testosterone relates to prolonged.low level stress, or rather a higher baseline stress level – for example the constant stimulus of living in urban centers, or prolonged financial stress…i.e. anomie Also – occupations that have intermittent physical stress coupled with enough recovery time, tend to elevate testosterone. for example: jobs which include physical exertion but don’t include “taking work home with you” (no worrying about after hours.)

  • Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,T

    Rule of law = Sovereignty, Property(Demonstrated Interest), Reciprocity, Court,Testimony, Jury, Resulting in markets.

    Socialism = Borrowing by the state, to make investments by the state, in industries producible by the state, and the redistribution of earnings into the commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 19:35:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190351589724295174

    Reply addressees: @ironpatriot2016 @whysuspectus @AndrewYang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190341793847619584


    IN REPLY TO:

    @viralstrikeai

    @whysuspectus @AndrewYang @curtdoolittle comments.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190341793847619584

  • WHAT DOES “BAIT INTO HAZARD” MEAN? —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any cha

    WHAT DOES “BAIT INTO HAZARD” MEAN?

    —“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean

    Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—

    If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral.

    If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.

    If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.

    if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.

    In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 18:42:00 UTC

  • I make mistakes like any other human. But I don’t Err. Ever. Ever. I have learne

    I make mistakes like any other human. But I don’t Err. Ever.

    Ever.

    I have learned from physical laws of nature, the natural law of men, and the possibility of testimony, how the Semitic lies are made – and why.

    We know. You’re done.

    Compromise or fail.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-11-01 01:19:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190075791096324096

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190071875155767297


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190071875155767297

  • Yet as christians demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breakin

    Yet as christians demonstrate, she maintains utility in hostility to his breaking of her illusion, because then she would have to acknowledge the debt, and provide something in trade.

    Y’all are parasites, liars, and thieves unless you fight – hard, and soon. Just parasites.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 23:18:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190045490877997058

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays The feminine christian perpetuates the female reproductive strategy of worrying only about the safety of her nest, while the men do the hard labor of transforming reality into safety and resources which she can spend on her nest, herself, her offspring.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1190045044805427200

  • No, we say, these are the physical laws of the natural world, these are the natu

    No, we say, these are the physical laws of the natural world, these are the natural laws of human cooperation, and within these rules men ascend into the gods we imagine (aryanism) by rapid, continuous, adaptation, to invention and change.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-31 19:29:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189987895865679872

    Reply addressees: @dglaffere @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189986816042164225


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189986816042164225

  • No the Founders Didn’t Fail, the Church Failed – Repeatedly – Just as It Is Failing Today. We Are Trying to Restore Our Religion if Only in Defense

    [‪O]ne cannot force those of us who cannot believe to lie that we believe. One cannot force those who believe not to. It matters only to believers whether we follow the natural law in for superstitious, philosophical,or scientific reasons. Because you must defend the comforting lie by which you pay the cost of membership in the community of the faithful, and profess observance to the same rules as we simply because they are evidentiary empirically demonstrated laws of nature, whether or not a a deity imposed them. The founders advanced european civilization by advancing the aristotelian project, that advanced the law of our ancestors, using martial truth, truthful testimonial, warranty of that testimony, and test of that testimony before a jury of our peers. In other words, truth must be testifiable. But the founders were part of the first major phase of restoration of western civlization from semitic conquest by false promise, ignorance and deceit. So while between the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, So they lacked the knowledge The failure of the founders was trusting the church to teach the ignorant illiterate poor. The Church failed because it failed the reforms I am proposing whereby the natural law and Christian Love are stated in scientific terms, embedded in our law and the constitution constructed from it. So that the reason we obey the natural law, whether by i) command of a depotic evil selfish Semitic god, or ii) the good god of the Persians and romans Jesus transformed and merged into a jewish new testament god; or iii) or of Jesus himself as a philosopher speaking new wisdom literature in the only language the primitive peoples could understand, or iv) of Aristotle himself as the philosopher of truth creating new wisdom literature we call science, or v) the evidence of human success and failure throughout history: science and history of world jurisprudence. Because by putting the natural law and christian love and charity into the law of man, a constitution under that law, and into the education of people- the scientific, the rational, and the faithful act the same, according to an immutable natural law, the transgression of which licenses violence against them. Thereby eliminating all competition from hostile alien religions in scientific, rational, or theological form. Once embedded in our law, the ‘folk’ can govern, adapt, and evolve their religion, as they have for over a thousand years, and no church can fail them. And no competitor can usurp them. So just as the classes can cooperate economically despite different abilities interests, and means of storytelling because of the natural law, the classes can cooperate socially and politically despite different interests, abilities, and means of stories, under that law. Because the law is same for all parties – and all that differs is the story they use to measure theirs and others’ thoughts word and deeds. But the law – the system of measurement is the same regardless of language and grammar of storytelling that provides that system of measurement. [C]hristians are rather … politically incompetent …, because they practice a religion that failed to evolve like islam into a political religion, because their church failed to succeed at governing, as it was doomed to fail from the beginning. The jews, christians, and muslims, forever failed to grasp, that they were creating not a system of rule or civilization, but a system of rebellion against the indo european revolution, of truth, reciprocity, markets, meritocracy, and hierarchy, that created a natural division between the classes, increasing the power-distance between members previously able to directly address headmen and elders – even the corrupt headmen and elders of the semites. And that the consequences of jewish, christian, and muslim civilization was destruction of every single civilization it touches. Christianity succeed in the modern world after failing in the medieval, not succeeding because of anything christian, but because of european military, technology, literacy, commerce, and law that was made possible by the failure of the church to consolidate power among the monarchies, and thereby converting europe into semitic submission, corruption, ignorance and poverty. If anything, as most historians have stated before me, christianity served as a cover story for justifying restoration of European-Indo-Iranic Aryan Tradition of Conquest, that had conquered the world from spain to the borders of china, and made the indo european religion the largest in the world. We have proposed, I have proposed, a correction of this failure of christianity, and that is to complete the conversion of christianity to a European folk religion as we have seen in the american evangelical movement, and away from a semitic, despotic, religion specifically evolved to sell false promise to the underclass in the next world, as a means of their submission to despotism and ignorance in the living world. I propose restoring the churches to central function of family and education, but that these churches may choose to teach the scientific, philosophical, or supernatural versions of natural law and christian love and charity, and if we are lucky, and in addition, restore the debt payment we call worship to nature (heathen), our ancestors, and our heroes(pagan), for those of us who need a good spirit (nature) or a masculine god to rise to (heroes), as well as those of you who need a maternal feminine god to submit to (saints). Or you can in your folly, let happen to protestantism under islam what the catholics have let happen under jewish influence, and take your selfish egos, your arrogance, your un-christ-like intolerance, into extinction, like the jews and muslims have destroyed every great civlization that they have touched. You have only yourselves to blame for your arrogance.