@galt_the @JohnNune1 … they do not seek reciprocity. They lie consistently to defend self image and status. Why don’t you admit your people’s repeated failures? Why the false history? Why the posturing? (We admit our screw ups all the time.)
Here is the abrahamic method:
https://propertarianism.com/2019/07/09/a-short-course-on-abrahamism-and-the-jq/
@galt_the @JohnNune1 … they do not seek reciprocity. They lie consistently to defend self image and status. Why don’t you admit your people’s repeated failures? Why the false history? Why the posturing? (We admit our screw ups all the time.)
Here is the abrahamic method:
https://t.co/1pnbG43EJG
… they do not seek reciprocity. They lie consistently to defend self image and status. Why don’t you admit your people’s repeated failures? Why the false history? Why the posturing? (We admit our screw ups all the time.)
Here is the abrahamic method: https://propertarianism.com/2019/07/09/a-short-course-on-abrahamism-and-the-jq/
@galt_the @JohnNune1 Women deny cooperation they do not seek compromise upon which to cooperate (preserve false status)
Women do not admit fault. (preserve false status)
They conflate truth/falsehood with approval/disapproval.
They engage in undermining by moralizing, psychologizing, shaming….
@galt_the @JohnNune1 Women deny cooperation they do not seek compromise upon which to cooperate (preserve false status)
Women do not admit fault. (preserve false status)
They conflate truth/falsehood with approval/disapproval.
They engage in undermining by moralizing, psychologizing, shaming….
—“This is a very vague non-answer that tries to appear smart by using a big word salad and sounds like something the typical libertarian atheist who’s sure of his own intellect would say. I still don’t understand what Propertarianism is.”— Ryan Chapman
Always an overconfident moron in the bunch.
What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism? What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism? What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions? Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols? So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)? Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational. What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations). It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions).
Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method. Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements. By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech. We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench). Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons. And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of. In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime.
So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes.
And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics.
Being anti-abrahamic is like being anti-marxist, or anti islam. It’s not being anti-genetics. I’m not anti-anyone who pursues reciprocity. And even then, reciprocity is enforceable under the law by natural incentives.
Sure, I want to live in a homogenous polity because it’s the optimum condition for people who love high trust commons, and love to benefit from them and contribute to them. We are hunters and our territory matters.
On the other hand if you’ll fight for Truth, Excellence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, with me then we are still relations.
What is the difference between morals, ethics and manners?
CORRECT ANSWER:
It’s not complicated – if we explain it in **economic** rather than ‘moral’ language.
Western civilization is a commercial civilization (middle class), and that is the reason for our wealth, cleanliness, orderliness, customer service, and tolerance. The west was more successful than all but the Japanese at suppression of selfish public behavior, and for this reason was able to produce commons that people did not impose costs upon, providing incentive (lacking disincentive) to produce commons, and therefore creating the high returns on the commons. (Effectively, westerners treat the commons – common spaces and everything in them – as sacred).
Engage only in completely voluntary exchanges. That means do not impose costs upon others whether attention (mental), disgust(emotion), or action (body), on their demonstrated interests (things, family, business), and the “commons” anything the public may make use of.
Instead, pay the cost of controlling yourself, by maintaining ‘situational awareness of others’ (consideration), especially by managing your children. The public space is not something you may make use of as you desire. it is not your home.
**Manners** advertise fitness for reciprocity. The more costly the manners, the higher the suppression of impulse, the greater the demonstration of agency and training, the better the promise and better the predictor of fitness for reciprocity.
**Respect** consists of using manners to demonstrate reciprocity and presumption of reciprocity regardless of differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in opinion, and differences in preferences.
**Disrespect** consists of irreciprocity presumption of irreciprocity given differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in knowledge, habit, and opinion, and differences in preferences.
**Insult** consists of (…)
**Resistance** consist of (…)
**Defection** consists of (…)
|| Spectrum: genetic > sexual > social > economic > political > military
**Display**
* **Hygiene**
* **Dress**
* **Movement**
**Word**
* **Speech**
**Deed**
* **Action**
* **Space**
Manners signal respect by paying cost of observance, and require reciprocity by equal payment of costs of observance.
Respect refers to presumption of the spectrum of reciprocity to beneficence by your demonstration of respect for others interests, and the interest of the commons.
Manners are your ‘advertising’ for worthiness of respect. Lack of manners are your ‘advertising’ for unworthiness of respect: meaning, not giving your attention, consideration, or resources (time, energy). And poor manners require others actively disrespect you (‘punish you’) for imposing costs upon others.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81041691_173436870721141_8715498446229864448_o_173436867387808.jpg EXPANDING THE BULLET LIST: WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?
LETS USE MINIMUM DETAIL
“Propertarianism is the completion of (the complete) scientific method.”
That’s it. Period. But it’s a profound thing. Very.
Now what do we do with that completed scientific method?
This scientific method is value neutral, and commensurable regardless of discipline, and universal in application.
We use that scientific method to produce a value neutral fully commensurable language across all disciplines.
We use that logic and language to produce a universally commensurable value neutral system of law.
We used that value neutral system of law to produce a constitution.
That constitution’s principle innovation is to incrementally suppress the means by which western civlization in the ancient and modern world was undermined by crimes of plausible deniability (which I won’t explain right here), but that’s what you think of when you think of leftism.
One can create an infinite number of constitutions of infinite variety using that law, as long as one constructs them truthfully and reciprocally – which is a problem for the left.
The constitution we propose restores the american constitution to its original intent as military and treasury that allows for the concentration of military power sufficient for defense of the continent, devolves all other powers to the states, makes everyone liable for the truth and reciprocity of speech in public to the public about matters public (outlaws leftism), and reforms every single aspect of life so that we restore our civilization from the ((())) harms done to it this past century.
That constitution is on line and in progress and is a lot to swallow, but then so are the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Amendements, History of Supreme Court Rulings, Federal Code, and Individual State constitutions and codes.
Propertarianism is the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to the totality of human knowledge, creating a universally commensurable value neutral language; its embodiment in the natural common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of [all deceit] from the informational commons.
See?
LETS ADD A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method.
Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements.
By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech.
We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench).
Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons.
And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of.
In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime.
So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes
WHAT IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT? (A GRAMMAR)
What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism?
What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism?
What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions?
Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols?
So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)?
Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational.
What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations).
It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions).
And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics.EXPANDING THE BULLET LIST: WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?
LETS USE MINIMUM DETAIL
“Propertarianism is the completion of (the complete) scientific method.”
That’s it. Period. But it’s a profound thing. Very.
Now what do we do with that completed scientific method?
This scientific method is value neutral, and commensurable regardless of discipline, and universal in application.
We use that scientific method to produce a value neutral fully commensurable language across all disciplines.
We use that logic and language to produce a universally commensurable value neutral system of law.
We used that value neutral system of law to produce a constitution.
That constitution’s principle innovation is to incrementally suppress the means by which western civlization in the ancient and modern world was undermined by crimes of plausible deniability (which I won’t explain right here), but that’s what you think of when you think of leftism.
One can create an infinite number of constitutions of infinite variety using that law, as long as one constructs them truthfully and reciprocally – which is a problem for the left.
The constitution we propose restores the american constitution to its original intent as military and treasury that allows for the concentration of military power sufficient for defense of the continent, devolves all other powers to the states, makes everyone liable for the truth and reciprocity of speech in public to the public about matters public (outlaws leftism), and reforms every single aspect of life so that we restore our civilization from the ((())) harms done to it this past century.
That constitution is on line and in progress and is a lot to swallow, but then so are the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Amendements, History of Supreme Court Rulings, Federal Code, and Individual State constitutions and codes.
Propertarianism is the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to the totality of human knowledge, creating a universally commensurable value neutral language; its embodiment in the natural common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of [all deceit] from the informational commons.
See?
LETS ADD A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method.
Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements.
By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech.
We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench).
Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons.
And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of.
In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime.
So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes
WHAT IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT? (A GRAMMAR)
What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism?
What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism?
What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions?
Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols?
So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)?
Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational.
What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations).
It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions).
And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics.
High trust, rule of law of (tort property sovereignty reciprocity), majority middle class, testimonial truth, truth before face, realism, naturalism, materialism, science, are the product of a universal militia small in number on the edge of the bronze age, reliant on maneuver.
Result: heroism, truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, jury and customary law of tort, producing markets in all aspects of life: aristocratic egalitarianism. Military epistemology for rather obvious reasons is the least tolerant of fictionalisms that plague all other cultures.
@scprsp @razibkhan What is the the criteria for decidability in each of the remaining civilizations – how does each people differ in decision criteria, and the claim of the ‘good’?
West=metallurgy, horse(maneuver warfare), entrepreneurial warfare, militarized society, martial truth (reporting).
@scprsp @razibkhan What is the the criteria for decidability in each of the remaining civilizations – how does each people differ in decision criteria, and the claim of the ‘good’?
West=metallurgy, horse(maneuver warfare), entrepreneurial warfare, militarized society, martial truth (reporting).
