Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR See, you don’t get it. The onl

    TO VIOLATE OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS TO INVITE US TO WAR

    See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity.

    You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be.

    That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy.

    We are the men of Europa.

    We are sovereigns – all.

    And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:45:00 UTC

  • THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING

    THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY

    by Reece Haynes

    5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people.

    And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary.

    Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes.

    And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    —

    CD:

    The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 19:06:00 UTC

  • STATE RELIGION? —“Would a P government endorse a religion?”–Tim Abbott P-law

    STATE RELIGION?

    —“Would a P government endorse a religion?”–Tim Abbott

    P-law allows the truthful reciprocal construction of any form of government and any economy as long as it’s stated in strictly constructed p-law.

    A continuation of the european sovereigns under rule of law by natural law of reciprocity, that we see in the proto-germanic, germanic, anglo saxon, english, british, american constitutions would yes, permit and possibly require a state religion.

    It would require compatibility with natural law. This leaves only traditional european religions (all of them), and christianity, and prohibits all others. And it posits chirstianity in scientific terms.

    In general, history has taught us that state religion is necessary, and so it appears we will have a set of state religions and state funding of religion as we do schools. Even though that religion will cover a broad spectrum of secular, pagan, and monotheistic christian religions.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-01 09:52:00 UTC

  • The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the

    The rest is the explicit statement that the constitution is a description of the natural law sovereignty and reciprocity; the terms by which the law is conducted; and detail of the law that enumerates the powers, and processes.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-31 16:32:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282962260733952

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223282961216430084

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics;reduces power distance in producing those commons;allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282961216430084

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    This restores the european pattern of history as a competing network of states producing various commons suitable to their demographics;reduces power distance in producing those commons;allows people to migrate to or prevent migration to social and political order of preference.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1223282961216430084

  • Of course. 😉 Just staying on message. Sovereignty, rule of law of reciprocity,

    Of course. 😉 Just staying on message. Sovereignty, rule of law of reciprocity, truth, and incremental suppression of parasitism under it, with soft market eugenics and in six to ten generations most peoples can at least approach european social orders. (They won’t, but can.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 23:54:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223031706032246784

    Reply addressees: @SirJohn981

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223030662032130054

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1223030662032130054

  • It’s not complicated – if you are intellectually honest. The problem is we all l

    It’s not complicated – if you are intellectually honest. The problem is we all live our little lies and frauds and free riding.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-30 18:23:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222948587396587520

    Reply addressees: @Nationalist7346 @Semiogogue @PropertarianBoi @JohnMarkSays @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222947284658401282

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1222947284658401282

  • “Caesar was asked if he believed in the gods, to which he replied, ‘The common f

    —“Caesar was asked if he believed in the gods, to which he replied, ‘The common folk do- so must I’.”—Bjarg Jonsson

    Reciprocity: The people sacrifice to the emperor, the emperor sacrifices to the people. The sacrifice is an expression of loyalty at cost. The sacrifice is not a falsehood. It is material. It is not a payment. But it is a cost.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-29 08:48:00 UTC

  • THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW There is only one law with two faces, and that is the law

    THERE IS ONLY ONE LAW

    There is only one law with two faces, and that is the law of reciprocity: in the negative as prohibitions – that is the contribution of european man; and on the inverse, the law of exhausting interpersonal forgiveness : in the positive: as demands – that is the contribution of christianity.

    The Pagan European command of paternalism to domesticate humans from slaves to serfs to freemen, and if possible to citizens and sovereigns. And the monotheistic resistance to domestication by the extension of kinship love to non kin.

    The original christianity was just another peasant rebellion against better people wanting to domesticate half human animals. The byzantine compromise was a practical solution to the greco roman empire’s loss of wealth and military power: like communism a false promise of reward in the next world, instead of economic reward after a revolution – neither of which is possible.

    Eventually, we germanized christianity and made it into something decent. It took a long time to undo the horror and corruption of the catholic church. Eventually the Orthodox preserved the ritualism without the politics. Eventually adam smith wrote down ethics in scientific terms, hume the human mind in scientific terms, and slowly we have dragged ourselves kiking and screaming to restore the two thousand years we lost to semitic underclass dark ages of resistance to mans domestication transcendence, and eugenic evolution.

    So it is possibly true that that the extension of kinship love to non kin is a good thing. It is possibly true that piety for those lacking agency and ability is a good thing. It is better however that we limit the extension of love to kin groups; and that we substitute loyalty to one another rather than piety to a false god.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-28 11:21:00 UTC

  • INTERSEX “DISCIPLINE” (hard questions) (judgemet of the natural law) —“Serious

    INTERSEX “DISCIPLINE”

    (hard questions) (judgemet of the natural law)

    —“Serious question, is it ever justifiable to hit a woman if she grsm’s you too much? What is the recommended amount of force under P?”—Jack Hwite

    This is a great example of how sovereignty has been used throughout our history. And why this question has such a long history in our law: because it’s a common problem.

    Justifiable isn’t a meaningful term. Instead, under natural law, and under traditional european law, you can challenge anyone male of female to a duel, demand apology, demand satisfaction, and if refused exercise sovereignty in self defense.

    Or put differently, in natural law, each of us is sovereign, whether male or female. But the sexes differ in our exercise of force.

    “A male physical super-predator exchanges the forgoing of his violence with women so long as women social super-predators exchange forgoing their their undermining (GSRRM) in return. If this contract is broken then physical violence and undermining are both licensed.

    Or the individuals may choose to forgo the duel and simply have at each other in words and hands.

    A judicially sanctioned duel before peers is preferred, since differences in ability can be minimized by traditional pit and bag or other means.

    A conflict can be brought before the court instead and settled there. Because “Scolding” is just as much a violation of sovereignty and the peach as is physical violence.

    However, this is limited to discipline for insult, and when the other party lies down and submits the conflict must stop – otherwise the parties extend beyond the judicial duel into attempted murder.

    This competition is the only way to prevent male and female warfare by their individual means.

    We have constrained men’s violence but let loose women’s violence – and we are paying the price of undermining our civilization as a consequence.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 11:14:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/83023926_562709447659283_80640035629

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/83023926_562709447659283_806400356299833344_n_562709444325950.jpg —“The libertarian case for veganism: Sentience extends to cows, chicken, pigs & even fish. These are beings with a consciousness. They experience pleasure and pain, bond with their young & pursue their own purposes, even if they are simple purposes such as seeking food”— via Quillette

    Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – and prevent overreach. These things are our food. Not abusing them and not eating them are two different things. And the reason not to abuse them is that we don’t want such people in our midst.

    (See attached definitions.)

    Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.

    Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.

    There are many checks on men’s antisocial behavior in fulfillment of demand for cognitive load – although sports, and video games are wasteful they aren’t harmful, and business and the arts are constructive. There are no such checks on women’s behavior.—“The libertarian case for veganism: Sentience extends to cows, chicken, pigs & even fish. These are beings with a consciousness. They experience pleasure and pain, bond with their young & pursue their own purposes, even if they are simple purposes such as seeking food”— via Quillette

    Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – and prevent overreach. These things are our food. Not abusing them and not eating them are two different things. And the reason not to abuse them is that we don’t want such people in our midst.

    (See attached definitions.)

    Secondly, pejoratively, the female nervous system evolved to carry a cognitive load that included empathy with offspring. Just as when men aren’t supplied with competition they behave dysfunctionally, when women aren’t supplied with emotional load they find “strange obsessions”.

    Vegetarianism, like animal activism, political activism, or gossiping and undermining, is among the strange obsessions that women devote their cognitive demand for emotional load to in the absence of more constructive outputs (children). The problem is there is no check on women.

    There are many checks on men’s antisocial behavior in fulfillment of demand for cognitive load – although sports, and video games are wasteful they aren’t harmful, and business and the arts are constructive. There are no such checks on women’s behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 08:51:00 UTC