Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • Rights Aren’t Cheap – the Plan

    —“I’m gunna be a d__k for a moment. Wouldn’t a reduction in furthering this movement due to you having to take care of your mother be considered “not bearing the cost”? its not bearing the cost of “losing mother” in order “to fight”. Not meaning to make this personal – only pointing at the bullshit of these types of “do it for the cause” virtue/purity signals. … its really just a subtle “no true scotsman” and a kick in the teeth when done in the absence of acknowledging the costs already born by those that support your vision.”—Wayne Righton

    Good and honest question. I have no problem making that hard choice, and no problem dying for the cause. The truth is it’s strategically optimum to live in country, to maintain an out of country residence, have no assets in-country, to have no ‘entanglements’ and to be able to go fully mobile on a moment’s notice from within country. Otherwise I would have brought a certain ukrainian woman here, or returned to ukraine – because i’d be a lot happier doing biz and living a normal life, than working on this revolution and house-sitting the elderly from a backwater. At present I have a pretty concrete plan. We need enough gov’t employees back at work. (they are) We want some men still out of work (they will be). We want the president fearful of losing the election (he will be). We want stress from that anxiety to spread (it will) I need a ‘dramatic’ way of issuing the ‘proposal’ of settlement, but will seize any opportunity I can (three options). And I need enough people to show up so that the first phase works, and escalates to the second phase (that’s your problem). Aside from that: What evidence do you have that I don’t think things thru? 😉 Nothing is perfect. Nothing is fail safe. But we can make sure many people know the ‘offer’ ahead of time, then we’re fine. We don’t want to go early. We want to go at the last possible minute seizing the greatest opportunity for stress prior to the election. The optimum arrangement would be that we get enough traction to get a few players in the conservative media on board with the plan so that they voluntarily or out of necessity explain our ‘just’ position. What’s the worst that will happen? First try won’t be successful but will have been the most successful publicity action since Boston’s fight with the Redcoats. What’s the best that will happen? it will work and the entire world will shake, and the chaos that results will bring everyone to the table. What’s better than that? The conservatives adopt the platform. Now flip it around: I’m paying a huge cost (and so are my investors by the way.) If you’re dumb enough to both be in a vulnerable position AND use your real name so that you can pay some external loss then that’s your choice. Plenty of people don’t. If you think I’m writing another ideology, then you’re wasting your time and mine. If you want emotional, moral, and intellectual sedation by some narrative that makes you feel justified then you’re wasting your time and mine. I switched from intellectual to revolutionary when I was divorced raped, then procedurally nearly put out of business by manipulation of the court, then when the state sold my company’s bank but guaranteed the loans, so that the bank was incentivized to put us out of business, then Obama made it clear he was out to unify the left against my people, and then my own government tried to criminalize having made and honest living, by shutting down overseas banking, and then when for a simple error on a tax form where the state owed me hundreds of thousands, they nearly killed my business. I’m tired of lack of juridical defense. I’m tired of a genocide against my people. I’m tired of the second destruction of western civilization by the same means. And I’m tired of an enemy among us reveling in our naivety and tolerance. So man the F-k up. Shut the f-k up. Show the F-k up. And if you’re not here for the revolution, don’t waste the time of the men who are. Restoration of our rights as ‘Englishmen’. The rights made and rights we have fought to maintain for centuries. And if you don’t man up, shut up, and show up, then you don’t deserve those rights.

  • Rights Aren’t Cheap – the Plan

    —“I’m gunna be a d__k for a moment. Wouldn’t a reduction in furthering this movement due to you having to take care of your mother be considered “not bearing the cost”? its not bearing the cost of “losing mother” in order “to fight”. Not meaning to make this personal – only pointing at the bullshit of these types of “do it for the cause” virtue/purity signals. … its really just a subtle “no true scotsman” and a kick in the teeth when done in the absence of acknowledging the costs already born by those that support your vision.”—Wayne Righton

    Good and honest question. I have no problem making that hard choice, and no problem dying for the cause. The truth is it’s strategically optimum to live in country, to maintain an out of country residence, have no assets in-country, to have no ‘entanglements’ and to be able to go fully mobile on a moment’s notice from within country. Otherwise I would have brought a certain ukrainian woman here, or returned to ukraine – because i’d be a lot happier doing biz and living a normal life, than working on this revolution and house-sitting the elderly from a backwater. At present I have a pretty concrete plan. We need enough gov’t employees back at work. (they are) We want some men still out of work (they will be). We want the president fearful of losing the election (he will be). We want stress from that anxiety to spread (it will) I need a ‘dramatic’ way of issuing the ‘proposal’ of settlement, but will seize any opportunity I can (three options). And I need enough people to show up so that the first phase works, and escalates to the second phase (that’s your problem). Aside from that: What evidence do you have that I don’t think things thru? 😉 Nothing is perfect. Nothing is fail safe. But we can make sure many people know the ‘offer’ ahead of time, then we’re fine. We don’t want to go early. We want to go at the last possible minute seizing the greatest opportunity for stress prior to the election. The optimum arrangement would be that we get enough traction to get a few players in the conservative media on board with the plan so that they voluntarily or out of necessity explain our ‘just’ position. What’s the worst that will happen? First try won’t be successful but will have been the most successful publicity action since Boston’s fight with the Redcoats. What’s the best that will happen? it will work and the entire world will shake, and the chaos that results will bring everyone to the table. What’s better than that? The conservatives adopt the platform. Now flip it around: I’m paying a huge cost (and so are my investors by the way.) If you’re dumb enough to both be in a vulnerable position AND use your real name so that you can pay some external loss then that’s your choice. Plenty of people don’t. If you think I’m writing another ideology, then you’re wasting your time and mine. If you want emotional, moral, and intellectual sedation by some narrative that makes you feel justified then you’re wasting your time and mine. I switched from intellectual to revolutionary when I was divorced raped, then procedurally nearly put out of business by manipulation of the court, then when the state sold my company’s bank but guaranteed the loans, so that the bank was incentivized to put us out of business, then Obama made it clear he was out to unify the left against my people, and then my own government tried to criminalize having made and honest living, by shutting down overseas banking, and then when for a simple error on a tax form where the state owed me hundreds of thousands, they nearly killed my business. I’m tired of lack of juridical defense. I’m tired of a genocide against my people. I’m tired of the second destruction of western civilization by the same means. And I’m tired of an enemy among us reveling in our naivety and tolerance. So man the F-k up. Shut the f-k up. Show the F-k up. And if you’re not here for the revolution, don’t waste the time of the men who are. Restoration of our rights as ‘Englishmen’. The rights made and rights we have fought to maintain for centuries. And if you don’t man up, shut up, and show up, then you don’t deserve those rights.

  • Reciprocity in every thing. 😉

    Reciprocity in every thing. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-09 21:50:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259239240443080704

    Reply addressees: @PaulssonRussell

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1259238417184874496

  • Is It True You Need a High Iq for P? (no)

    Apr 27, 2020, 9:37 AM

    —“If I remember correctly, you once stated that an IQ of 120 is required as a bare minimum for having the most basic understanding of Propertarianism. Is this correct? Be honest”—Korey Savoie

    I almost wouldn’t answer this because of ‘be honest’. WTF do you think I do all day? At great personal cost. lol 😉 THE INFLUENCE OF IQ 1 – IQ determines time and effort in learning something. 2 – Cost benefit prediction determines willingness to invest time and effort in learning the subject. 3 – Cost benefit prediction determines willingness to invest in the time and effort of assisting others in their learning of the subject. So when I say “You need x IQ to understand P” it’s in the context of learning the METHOD along with the group. The 140/150+ crowd can do it quickly. Others not. It is very hard to explain and apply the method. That seems to be a 130/140 requirement. But pretty much anyone can understand everything up to applying it, and I’m not sure other than theoretical mathematicians will understand the underlying logic. UNDERSTAND WHAT PART OF THE PROJECT? EVERYONE The psychology (acquisition) sociology (compatibilism), the Ethics (basic reciprocity, telling the truth), and politics (optimum government)? MOST EVERYONE The foundations of western civ in natural law? The group strategies of different civilizations? The history? The JQ/20th C attack on our civ? SOME The method? Reciprocity? Testimony, the grammars? The legal method? Strict construction of law? The constitution? FEW Applying and arguing with the method VERY FEW The operational description of brain and consciousness? The logical foundations? The geometry of thought?

    —“Excellent. For some reason I thought you or Bill or Brandon posted a few months ago that an IQ of 120 was required just to scratch the surface. I haven’t been tested, but I assumed mine to be somewhere in the 100-109.”— Korey Savoie

    It’s because if someone ARGUES with us, that requires we resort to using the METHOD and if they can’t use the method we can’t conduct an argument. So we can understand what it tells us, vs understand how to use it. You don’t need to undrestand calculus to understand most statistical diagrams. You do if you want to argue against those diagrams. You don’t need to understand operationalism to undrestand the findings of operational analysis using P-law. You do if you want to argue against those findings. Understanding WHAT vs understanding HOW.

  • Apr 27, 2020, 10:07 PM —“Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin

    Apr 27, 2020, 10:07 PM

    —“Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin anarchy. Just reading something and the description seemed very similar to P but seems to simply lack the formalism around reciprocity.—-

    P is a method. I use the P-method to explain all group strategies, religions, political systems, and moral intuitions. I use P to recommend the optimum political system that has ever been formed – rule of law by natural law. I dunno why you would pick Bakunin. This is Bakunin’s fantasy:

    –“The liberty of man consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine, collective or individual.”–Bakunin

    What is true instead?

    1. Man desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunity is increased by liberty, but so is irresponsibility. And so is free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, immigration, conversion, conquest, and genocide.
    2. The state evolved to incrementally suppress local parasitism decreasing local transaction costs, in exchange for paying taxes to pay the cost of decreasing local transaction costs. This made markets possible where only primitive trade previously existed.
    3. Man is amoral by nature, and pragmatic. By the institution of parenting, acculturation, indoctrination, training, laws, restitution, punishment, and prevention we invest in his domestication.
    4. Man develops theology, philosophy, ideologies, rationalizations, myths, fantasies, and various other forms of frauds, to attempt to obscure and justify his free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime.
    5. In order to produce the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires a power law of institutions of prevention, investigation, dispute resolution, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention.
    6. In order to produce a market requires a pareto distribution of assets, so that the organization of networks in an market can produce a complex division of labor and its returns without which the terms freedom and liberty have no meaning.
    7. In order to produce a society that tolerates market competition and the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires the resulting distribution of rewards satisfy a marginal nash equilibrium.
    8. Given three possible means of coercion: force-defense (Military-police, government), trade-boycott(commerce-law), and advocacy+insurance-undermining+ostracization(social,education,religion), elites will combine to use and misuse these skills in a competition.
    9. Given that Man varies greatly from barely human to superhuman in physical, social, and intellectual ability, and sexual, social, economic, political, and military value, and given the power, pareto, and nash necessities of distributions, man will sort by value to others by his value in those markets – producing networks of competing and overlapping hierarchies that we call sexual, social, economic, and political class.
    10. As such, rule of law and the independent judiciary provide a market for the suppression of not only individuals and groups of individuals, but elites in all three dimensions of elites, such that sovereignty, liberty and freedom are maintained DESPITE the presence of necessary hierarchies.

    So I consider bakunin like all other idiots as immature, adolescent, vain and ignorant consequences of the industrial revolution and the disregard for the hierarchies in elites of all resulted, and the that these vain, ignorant, immature, adolescent minds gave fertile soil for the false promise of pseudosciences and sophisms of the anti european sense making, and anti-european marxism, neo-marxism, neo-conservatism, libertarianism, postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denial of the foundations of western civlization: that we used markets in everything to defeat regression to the mean by suppressing the reproduction of those that lacked ability to compete in the markets in the service of others. In other words, I view these well meaning fools as useful idiots in the destruction of western civlization. Which is how I pretty much view everyone.

  • Apr 27, 2020, 10:07 PM —“Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin

    Apr 27, 2020, 10:07 PM

    —“Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin anarchy. Just reading something and the description seemed very similar to P but seems to simply lack the formalism around reciprocity.—-

    P is a method. I use the P-method to explain all group strategies, religions, political systems, and moral intuitions. I use P to recommend the optimum political system that has ever been formed – rule of law by natural law. I dunno why you would pick Bakunin. This is Bakunin’s fantasy:

    –“The liberty of man consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine, collective or individual.”–Bakunin

    What is true instead?

    1. Man desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunity is increased by liberty, but so is irresponsibility. And so is free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, immigration, conversion, conquest, and genocide.
    2. The state evolved to incrementally suppress local parasitism decreasing local transaction costs, in exchange for paying taxes to pay the cost of decreasing local transaction costs. This made markets possible where only primitive trade previously existed.
    3. Man is amoral by nature, and pragmatic. By the institution of parenting, acculturation, indoctrination, training, laws, restitution, punishment, and prevention we invest in his domestication.
    4. Man develops theology, philosophy, ideologies, rationalizations, myths, fantasies, and various other forms of frauds, to attempt to obscure and justify his free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime.
    5. In order to produce the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires a power law of institutions of prevention, investigation, dispute resolution, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention.
    6. In order to produce a market requires a pareto distribution of assets, so that the organization of networks in an market can produce a complex division of labor and its returns without which the terms freedom and liberty have no meaning.
    7. In order to produce a society that tolerates market competition and the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires the resulting distribution of rewards satisfy a marginal nash equilibrium.
    8. Given three possible means of coercion: force-defense (Military-police, government), trade-boycott(commerce-law), and advocacy+insurance-undermining+ostracization(social,education,religion), elites will combine to use and misuse these skills in a competition.
    9. Given that Man varies greatly from barely human to superhuman in physical, social, and intellectual ability, and sexual, social, economic, political, and military value, and given the power, pareto, and nash necessities of distributions, man will sort by value to others by his value in those markets – producing networks of competing and overlapping hierarchies that we call sexual, social, economic, and political class.
    10. As such, rule of law and the independent judiciary provide a market for the suppression of not only individuals and groups of individuals, but elites in all three dimensions of elites, such that sovereignty, liberty and freedom are maintained DESPITE the presence of necessary hierarchies.

    So I consider bakunin like all other idiots as immature, adolescent, vain and ignorant consequences of the industrial revolution and the disregard for the hierarchies in elites of all resulted, and the that these vain, ignorant, immature, adolescent minds gave fertile soil for the false promise of pseudosciences and sophisms of the anti european sense making, and anti-european marxism, neo-marxism, neo-conservatism, libertarianism, postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denial of the foundations of western civlization: that we used markets in everything to defeat regression to the mean by suppressing the reproduction of those that lacked ability to compete in the markets in the service of others. In other words, I view these well meaning fools as useful idiots in the destruction of western civlization. Which is how I pretty much view everyone.

  • The Uniqueness of Western Civilization: Adaptive Velocity

    “The Group Strategy (Philosophy) of Western Civilization in Scientific Terms: Excellence and Heroism, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The Jury and Markets in Everything.” The secret to western civilization, besides being a small, relatively poor population on the edge of the bronze age, is that by the choice of voluntary militia, military tactics of maneuver requiring contractualism, and heroic sovereignty (ownership of gains), we necessitated natural law, and markets in everything. And as a consequence the west was not first, but in every era we were fastest. In other words, truth, promise(contract), natural law, and jury allow us to adapt faster than every other known method of human cooperation. The indo european expansion, the greek and roman eras, the continental era, the age of sail, and the industrial era, all continued and expanded on this strategy. But where did it come from? GEOGRAPHIC NECESSITY … Pastoralists to Mixed Pastoralist-Farmers. … Concentration of wealth impossible COMPETITION … cattle raiding … entrepreneurial warfare MILITARY STRATEGY AND TACTICS … horse, bronze, wheel, … distance and maneuver … (Cattle, then scale, kill men, take cattle and women) … (Women were household labor force and had value) … (Women obtained independence and her own household by marriage to wealth – and escaped servitude) PIRATE ETHICS … entrepreneurship … ownership of spoils … democratic dispute resolution … displays of wealth to increase numbers … heroism to increase social standing and opportunities CONTRACTUALISM … Property by demonstrated interest … Sovereignty and Reciprocity … Oath and Contract DISPUTE RESOLUTION … Judge and Jury … Ruler and Thang … Senate and House … Senate and Houses … Federal senate and houses, … … State senate and houses, … … … Local cabinet and democracy. … … … … Neighborhood “meet” … … … … … Family “table” MARKETS IN EVERYTHING … produced markets in everything … association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, defense, and war. TOGETHER BROUGHT US … Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism … Reason, Rationalism, Science, Mathematics. … Engineering, Technology, Medicine … And the rescue of man from primitivism. AND BROUGHT US … Truth and Trust … Continuous reduction of transaction costs ENABLING … continuous devotion of savings of production to the production of commons. AT THE COST OF … (enemy > slave > workers > family) Suppression of the reproduction of those unable to produce economic independence – which is much harder than it seems, because alienation from a household meant near certain death. … Continuing Selection Pressure alleviated by agrarianism, and the resulting dysgenia – particularly urban dysgenia. AND SOCIALLY, BECAUSE OF THOSE MARKETS: … There are Three Possible Means of Coercion: … … Force, boycott, trade … Allowing and Incentivizing Three Sets of Elites: … … Military (State), Legal(polity), and Religious(family) RESULTING IN … Trifunctionalism: Our Three Sacred Faiths: … … The MILITIA of every able bodied man – we are an army, … … The LAW, our jury, and our rights – we are unruled because we tolerate only rule of law … … Our RELIGION whether Christian (familial), Pagan (martial and historical) or heathen (ancestors and nature). Because they are sacred, no man, no organization, no state, no enemy, may violate these faiths. AND MANEUVER/INITIATIVE WARFARE … Continued Adaptivity AND JUDGE DISCOVERED LAW …Continued Adaptivity AND RESULTING MARKETS … Continued Adaptivity AND RESULTING EUGENICS … Continued Adaptivity AND RESULT WAS … The Production of Agency: Evolution. CREATING THE ONLY PEOPLE NOT TO FAIL … From this understanding we might suggest the chances of life in the universe not stagnating and collapsing as has islam is small. THEREFORE – THE WEST: ADAPTIVE VELOCITY … The secret to western civilization, besides being a small, relatively poor population on the edge of the bronze age, is that by the choice of voluntary militia, military tactics of maneuver requiring contractualism, and heroic sovereignty (ownership of gains), we necessitated natural law, and markets in everything. And as a consequence the west was not first, but in every era we were fastest. In other words, truth, promise(contract), natural law, and jury allow us to adapt faster than every other known method of human cooperation. AND MINDFULNESS IN THE MILITARY-TRIFUNCTIONAL ORDER 1. Authoritarian Order 2. Commercial Order, 3. Military(militial) Order, 4. Religious Order 5. Diasporic Order RESPECT UNDER MILITARISM In the western tradition we are all members of a vast army fulfilling our duties. We all are due respect no matter our rank, as long as we do our duty. We are all due disrespect or even punishment if we do not do our duties. This is how we produced harmony – more harmony than any other civilization in history – while at the same time producing the most adaptive and rapidly evolutionary body of people in human history. We took control of evolution. HARMONY UNDER MILITARISM Mindfulness (Harmony): Professional military aristocracy, a Militia of every able bodied man, creates full time military: All men in military earn respect and are given respect for doing their duty; all duty is necessary and valuable for the success of the group in a high risk venture; rank is by demonstrated ability and merit (although often of families), leadership (captains, generals, kings) are chosen by the men who choose who to follow. In other words, every man gets a share of honor, and buys the franchise. This is the source of western harmony, and it is the strongest source of harmony available to man. (And is different from all other peoples). OTHERS THEY ARE UNFIT FOR SERVICE – AND FOR THE CONSTITUTION Western Civilization has been since its foundation, A militia. An army. A militarized society. We gain harmony from doing our duty, and sovereignty for having done it. Sovereignty is harder that liberty by permission, and freedom by promise. And all those who have come to us postwar to undermine that civilization are unfit for service. That is why they resist our constitution our natural law our markets, our responsibility – because they are not capable of sovereignty. SO IN SUMMARY: EUROPEAN STRATEGY IS: Competitive Excellence (Success) by, … the Continuous Production of Agency; … through continuous invention, continuous adaptation, and continuous domestication, regardless of costs to the status, competence, dominance hierarchy – whether the self, family, or leadership; by the combination of: … Heroism as Contribution to Commons, and; … Truth Regardless of Consequences to the Status, Competence, and Dominance Hierarchy – whether the self, family or leadership and; … Duty Regardless of Consequences to the self and family; …. Sovereignty and Reciprocity including reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity regardless of costs to the self and family; Leaving the only possible rules of cooperation as: … The Rule of Law, The Law of Tort (property), the Independent Judiciary, and; … Markets (meritocracy) in every aspect of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war; Resulting in: … Seeking and Finding of Pareto Optimums, in all markets; … The upward redistribution of reproduction defeating regression to the mean; … And the rapid transformation of men into the gods they imagined in the neolithic, bronze, iron, and steel ages. |STRATEGY| Transcendence > Innovation > Heroism(Risk) > Sovereignty > Truth, Duty, Reciprocity > Natural Law > Markets in Everything > The Most Rapid Adaptation Possible > The best evolutionary strategy possible – if you have the demographics for it. /MARKETS IN EVERYTHING/ Association > Cooperation > Production > Reproduction > Commons > Polities > Group Strategy

  • The Uniqueness of Western Civilization: Adaptive Velocity

    “The Group Strategy (Philosophy) of Western Civilization in Scientific Terms: Excellence and Heroism, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Truth and Duty, The Jury and Markets in Everything.” The secret to western civilization, besides being a small, relatively poor population on the edge of the bronze age, is that by the choice of voluntary militia, military tactics of maneuver requiring contractualism, and heroic sovereignty (ownership of gains), we necessitated natural law, and markets in everything. And as a consequence the west was not first, but in every era we were fastest. In other words, truth, promise(contract), natural law, and jury allow us to adapt faster than every other known method of human cooperation. The indo european expansion, the greek and roman eras, the continental era, the age of sail, and the industrial era, all continued and expanded on this strategy. But where did it come from? GEOGRAPHIC NECESSITY … Pastoralists to Mixed Pastoralist-Farmers. … Concentration of wealth impossible COMPETITION … cattle raiding … entrepreneurial warfare MILITARY STRATEGY AND TACTICS … horse, bronze, wheel, … distance and maneuver … (Cattle, then scale, kill men, take cattle and women) … (Women were household labor force and had value) … (Women obtained independence and her own household by marriage to wealth – and escaped servitude) PIRATE ETHICS … entrepreneurship … ownership of spoils … democratic dispute resolution … displays of wealth to increase numbers … heroism to increase social standing and opportunities CONTRACTUALISM … Property by demonstrated interest … Sovereignty and Reciprocity … Oath and Contract DISPUTE RESOLUTION … Judge and Jury … Ruler and Thang … Senate and House … Senate and Houses … Federal senate and houses, … … State senate and houses, … … … Local cabinet and democracy. … … … … Neighborhood “meet” … … … … … Family “table” MARKETS IN EVERYTHING … produced markets in everything … association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polities, defense, and war. TOGETHER BROUGHT US … Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism … Reason, Rationalism, Science, Mathematics. … Engineering, Technology, Medicine … And the rescue of man from primitivism. AND BROUGHT US … Truth and Trust … Continuous reduction of transaction costs ENABLING … continuous devotion of savings of production to the production of commons. AT THE COST OF … (enemy > slave > workers > family) Suppression of the reproduction of those unable to produce economic independence – which is much harder than it seems, because alienation from a household meant near certain death. … Continuing Selection Pressure alleviated by agrarianism, and the resulting dysgenia – particularly urban dysgenia. AND SOCIALLY, BECAUSE OF THOSE MARKETS: … There are Three Possible Means of Coercion: … … Force, boycott, trade … Allowing and Incentivizing Three Sets of Elites: … … Military (State), Legal(polity), and Religious(family) RESULTING IN … Trifunctionalism: Our Three Sacred Faiths: … … The MILITIA of every able bodied man – we are an army, … … The LAW, our jury, and our rights – we are unruled because we tolerate only rule of law … … Our RELIGION whether Christian (familial), Pagan (martial and historical) or heathen (ancestors and nature). Because they are sacred, no man, no organization, no state, no enemy, may violate these faiths. AND MANEUVER/INITIATIVE WARFARE … Continued Adaptivity AND JUDGE DISCOVERED LAW …Continued Adaptivity AND RESULTING MARKETS … Continued Adaptivity AND RESULTING EUGENICS … Continued Adaptivity AND RESULT WAS … The Production of Agency: Evolution. CREATING THE ONLY PEOPLE NOT TO FAIL … From this understanding we might suggest the chances of life in the universe not stagnating and collapsing as has islam is small. THEREFORE – THE WEST: ADAPTIVE VELOCITY … The secret to western civilization, besides being a small, relatively poor population on the edge of the bronze age, is that by the choice of voluntary militia, military tactics of maneuver requiring contractualism, and heroic sovereignty (ownership of gains), we necessitated natural law, and markets in everything. And as a consequence the west was not first, but in every era we were fastest. In other words, truth, promise(contract), natural law, and jury allow us to adapt faster than every other known method of human cooperation. AND MINDFULNESS IN THE MILITARY-TRIFUNCTIONAL ORDER 1. Authoritarian Order 2. Commercial Order, 3. Military(militial) Order, 4. Religious Order 5. Diasporic Order RESPECT UNDER MILITARISM In the western tradition we are all members of a vast army fulfilling our duties. We all are due respect no matter our rank, as long as we do our duty. We are all due disrespect or even punishment if we do not do our duties. This is how we produced harmony – more harmony than any other civilization in history – while at the same time producing the most adaptive and rapidly evolutionary body of people in human history. We took control of evolution. HARMONY UNDER MILITARISM Mindfulness (Harmony): Professional military aristocracy, a Militia of every able bodied man, creates full time military: All men in military earn respect and are given respect for doing their duty; all duty is necessary and valuable for the success of the group in a high risk venture; rank is by demonstrated ability and merit (although often of families), leadership (captains, generals, kings) are chosen by the men who choose who to follow. In other words, every man gets a share of honor, and buys the franchise. This is the source of western harmony, and it is the strongest source of harmony available to man. (And is different from all other peoples). OTHERS THEY ARE UNFIT FOR SERVICE – AND FOR THE CONSTITUTION Western Civilization has been since its foundation, A militia. An army. A militarized society. We gain harmony from doing our duty, and sovereignty for having done it. Sovereignty is harder that liberty by permission, and freedom by promise. And all those who have come to us postwar to undermine that civilization are unfit for service. That is why they resist our constitution our natural law our markets, our responsibility – because they are not capable of sovereignty. SO IN SUMMARY: EUROPEAN STRATEGY IS: Competitive Excellence (Success) by, … the Continuous Production of Agency; … through continuous invention, continuous adaptation, and continuous domestication, regardless of costs to the status, competence, dominance hierarchy – whether the self, family, or leadership; by the combination of: … Heroism as Contribution to Commons, and; … Truth Regardless of Consequences to the Status, Competence, and Dominance Hierarchy – whether the self, family or leadership and; … Duty Regardless of Consequences to the self and family; …. Sovereignty and Reciprocity including reciprocal insurance of sovereignty and reciprocity regardless of costs to the self and family; Leaving the only possible rules of cooperation as: … The Rule of Law, The Law of Tort (property), the Independent Judiciary, and; … Markets (meritocracy) in every aspect of life: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war; Resulting in: … Seeking and Finding of Pareto Optimums, in all markets; … The upward redistribution of reproduction defeating regression to the mean; … And the rapid transformation of men into the gods they imagined in the neolithic, bronze, iron, and steel ages. |STRATEGY| Transcendence > Innovation > Heroism(Risk) > Sovereignty > Truth, Duty, Reciprocity > Natural Law > Markets in Everything > The Most Rapid Adaptation Possible > The best evolutionary strategy possible – if you have the demographics for it. /MARKETS IN EVERYTHING/ Association > Cooperation > Production > Reproduction > Commons > Polities > Group Strategy

  • I’m not against anyone.

    May 2, 2020, 2:14 PM

    I”m not against anyone. But you’re either integrating into the militia, the natural law, duty reciprocity and truth, markets in everything, trifunctionalism, optimum government, and evolutionary necessity or you’re not only undermining western civlization, but mankind, and you’re not only depriving those of us who inherited all those institutions from self determination but leaving us no choice but war.

  • I’m not against anyone.

    May 2, 2020, 2:14 PM

    I”m not against anyone. But you’re either integrating into the militia, the natural law, duty reciprocity and truth, markets in everything, trifunctionalism, optimum government, and evolutionary necessity or you’re not only undermining western civlization, but mankind, and you’re not only depriving those of us who inherited all those institutions from self determination but leaving us no choice but war.