Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • A State Religion?

    Feb 1, 2020, 9:52 AM

    —“Would a P government endorse a religion?”–Tim Abbott

    P-law allows the truthful reciprocal construction of any form of government and any economy as long as it’s stated in strictly constructed p-law. A continuation of the european sovereigns under rule of law by natural law of reciprocity, that we see in the proto-germanic, germanic, anglo saxon, english, british, american constitutions would yes, permit and possibly require a state religion. It would require compatibility with natural law. This leaves only traditional european religions (all of them), and christianity, and prohibits all others. And it posits chirstianity in scientific terms. In general, history has taught us that state religion is necessary, and so it appears we will have a set of state religions and state funding of religion as we do schools. Even though that religion will cover a broad spectrum of secular, pagan, and monotheistic christian religions.

  • Chapter on “Cooperation (Morality)”

      SUBJECT HEADINGS: 1. Time 2. Division 3. Rationality 4. Reciprocity 5. Immorality 6. Morality 7. Forbearance 8. Trust 9. Virtue

    Elegant. 

  • Chapter on “Cooperation (Morality)”

      SUBJECT HEADINGS: 1. Time 2. Division 3. Rationality 4. Reciprocity 5. Immorality 6. Morality 7. Forbearance 8. Trust 9. Virtue

    Elegant. 

  • The Anglo Peoples Need …

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:06 PM THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY by Reece Haynes 5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people. And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary. Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes. And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    CD: The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.
      Edit

  • The Anglo Peoples Need …

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:06 PM THE ANGLO PEOPLES NEED WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS OF INVIOLABLE NATURAL LAW REQUIRING TRANSACTIONAL CHANGES, AND THE PEOPLE NEED JURIDICAL DEFENSE AND THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS JURIDICAL ACCOUNTABILITY by Reece Haynes 5 years in British politics (observing, theorizing, debating, practicing), proves everything you’ve said. The supremacy of Parliament is for nought when that Parliament is filled with the wrong people. And our unwritten constitution, plus the common law, is routinely disobeyed – with no sanctions applied by the judiciary. Not codifying the constitution, not maintaining the Empire, and not preserving the Aristotelian mixed model (hereditary monarchy and nobility, plus limited democracy) were all big mistakes. And then there’s the historical geopolitical mistakes which you also mention.

    CD: The judicial novelties I’ve found are:

    1. The hereditary monarchy as a judge of last resort in defense against the fashions of the people, the malice of a minority, and the failure of the political process, is indispensable.

    2. The commonwealth model is to be embraced by any future american political order, with the monarchy representing the english speaking peoples.

    3. The British parliamentary and debate model is superior to the american.

    4. The British two (or more) Tiered legal system is superior to the american.

    5. The German Proportional Party System is superior to the British and american — allowing superior policy and superior adaptation.

    6. The requirement for strict construction from the first principle of reciprocity, specific statement of the scope(limit), and reference of any prior legislation , legislation, or finding of the court, upon which it depends.

    7. the requirement that the judiciary return the undecidable to the legislature thereby preventing legislation from the bench – and the mechanism for judiciary to require the legislature settle the matter in reasonable time

    8. The liability of legislators, regulators, and judges to warranty (hold involuntary liability) for their actions in so much that they do not violate the constitution of natural law.

    9. The vulnerability of legislators, regulators, judges and their agents to judicial prosecution for violations of the constitution.

    10. The vulnerability of the public to prosecution for advocation in public to the public in matters public, of violation of the constitution.

    11. The addition of involuntary warranty and therefor liability, for the entire scope of baiting into hazard upon which the 20th century deceits were constructed.

    12. The reversal of borrower beware to lender beware.

    13. Universal standing in matters of the commons

    14. Restoration of every man (citizen) a sheriff (deputy), defense of self, property and commons, restoration of extrajudicial punishment; the judicially sanctioned duel; and the sovereignty of men and as such their requirement to bear arms.

    15. The jewish-french cosmopolitan sponsored invasion of western civlization has destroyed our experiment in democracy – and universal democracy must and will end and we have proposed a set of options for polities to choose from, the easiest of which is multiple houses to maintain numbers, or fewer voters by much higher criteria, or lastly, kinship(ethnic) voters only.
      Edit

  • To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:45 PM See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity. You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be. That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy. We are the men of Europa. We are sovereigns – all. And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

  • To Violate Our Sovereignty Is to Invite Us to War

    Feb 1, 2020, 7:45 PM See, you don’t get it. The only reason not to conquer, deprive, exploit, enserf, enslave, or end – or worse, is reciprocity. You see, ‘sovereign means’ capable of defense – every man a sovereign: a king, a legislature, a knight, a husband, a craftsman and all else he might be. That is why natural law and international law are the same: because no man has say over another unless he violates the sovereignty of another – and if so then they may war. If they choose not to war they may duel. If they choose not to duel they may seek decision from the people in a jury. If they do not abide by the jury they have lost the insurance of their sovereign peers, and are limited to their own defense. And as such, they will easily be the victims of war by the polity rather than just their prior enemy. We are the men of Europa. We are sovereigns – all. And to violate that sovereignty is to invite us into war.

  • Where Can I Learn Propertarianism (natural Law)

    Where Can I Learn Propertarianism (natural Law) https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/where-can-i-learn-propertarianism-natural-law/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:16:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264651591300395009

  • Where Can I Learn Propertarianism (natural Law)

    Feb 3, 2020, 10:13 AM

    —“Where may I learn the Rudiments of Propertarian Ideology?Close to half of Native America is tired of the Left Wing dropping Crumbs from Their table to starve Us into submission and then use Us as pawns in Their Self hating,racist political games,We are getting tired of Them turning Us into Victims so that They can come running to the rescue and play Hero at Our expense.We need something better than Their left wing, paternalistic Racism.”—

    A little context first. It’s a methodology. we use that methodology to create a universally commensurable, value neutral, language across all disciplines. This unites the physical and human sciences. We use that language to make it very hard to lie, cheat, fraud, or bait into hazard. We take that language and method and write law. That law is strictly constructed and closed to interpretation by courts. We wrote a constitution using that law that reflects the western civilizational strategy and tradition. This restores the constitutions original intent as a document of natural law that persists the western group strategy. We then write the western group strategy in those value neutral universally commensurable terms, so that our people finally know what makes them unique and special, and what made us successful. The only ‘ideology’ is whether you want to persist the western tradition of evolutionary excellence or not. On propertarianism dot com there is a link in the middle of the main menu. You can work your way through reading that. It is a lot of content. It touches every single discipline. It will overwhelm you. The constitution is also there in its current public and incomplete form. You can read a bit of all that, follow us here and learn by asking questions or just following along. (Although you have to tolerate many points of view) If you’re able you can join the SN (sheepdog nomocracy group) that is a sort of working classroom. Or you can take the foundations course at the institute and wait while I slowly release content. Those are the options.

  • Where Can I Learn Propertarianism (natural Law)

    Feb 3, 2020, 10:13 AM

    —“Where may I learn the Rudiments of Propertarian Ideology?Close to half of Native America is tired of the Left Wing dropping Crumbs from Their table to starve Us into submission and then use Us as pawns in Their Self hating,racist political games,We are getting tired of Them turning Us into Victims so that They can come running to the rescue and play Hero at Our expense.We need something better than Their left wing, paternalistic Racism.”—

    A little context first. It’s a methodology. we use that methodology to create a universally commensurable, value neutral, language across all disciplines. This unites the physical and human sciences. We use that language to make it very hard to lie, cheat, fraud, or bait into hazard. We take that language and method and write law. That law is strictly constructed and closed to interpretation by courts. We wrote a constitution using that law that reflects the western civilizational strategy and tradition. This restores the constitutions original intent as a document of natural law that persists the western group strategy. We then write the western group strategy in those value neutral universally commensurable terms, so that our people finally know what makes them unique and special, and what made us successful. The only ‘ideology’ is whether you want to persist the western tradition of evolutionary excellence or not. On propertarianism dot com there is a link in the middle of the main menu. You can work your way through reading that. It is a lot of content. It touches every single discipline. It will overwhelm you. The constitution is also there in its current public and incomplete form. You can read a bit of all that, follow us here and learn by asking questions or just following along. (Although you have to tolerate many points of view) If you’re able you can join the SN (sheepdog nomocracy group) that is a sort of working classroom. Or you can take the foundations course at the institute and wait while I slowly release content. Those are the options.