“THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE) https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/the-white-law-lex-europae-2/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 15:18:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265663719637422083
Theme: Reciprocity
-
“THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE)
Oct 30, 2019, 6:27 PM (fully extended)
“THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE)
Practicing:
Excellence, and Beauty, Heroism, and Duty Truth and Contract Reciprocity, and Sovereignty Compatibility and Hierarchy Natural Law and JuryProducing:
Markets in Everything Including: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Polities, and War And Natural Eugenics, With the direction of proceeds To the production of CommonsProducing:
The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the maximum quality of life, With maximum evolution, in the shortest possible time.Given:
the limitations of man, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to the evolution of man, into the gods we imagine.Because:
Every man is a warrior, a craftsman, a sheriff, a judge, and a sovereign, in the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. (undone)
-
“THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE)
Oct 30, 2019, 6:27 PM (fully extended)
“THE WHITE LAW” (LEX EUROPAE)
Practicing:
Excellence, and Beauty, Heroism, and Duty Truth and Contract Reciprocity, and Sovereignty Compatibility and Hierarchy Natural Law and JuryProducing:
Markets in Everything Including: Association, Cooperation, Production, Reproduction, Commons, Polities, and War And Natural Eugenics, With the direction of proceeds To the production of CommonsProducing:
The optimum human organization With the fastest innovation With the least resistance With the maximum quality of life, With maximum evolution, in the shortest possible time.Given:
the limitations of man, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to the evolution of man, into the gods we imagine.Because:
Every man is a warrior, a craftsman, a sheriff, a judge, and a sovereign, in the distributed dictatorship of sovereign men. (undone)
-
Another Christian Understands.
Nov 22, 2019, 8:38 AM by Stephen Phillips (this is a masculine christian speaking of the natural law in christian prose) Hello Curt, I understand what you’re driving at here. I’m a Christian, member of a Calvinist church. I am trying to convince people around me of the same things you were mentioning here. The bible conforms to natural law, as a Christian I would say natural law is God’s will. The heirarchy of God, men, women, children, animals and the environment. Men are the head of the house snd collectively we are the head of our nation/ethnicity. The bible speaks quite plainly about most of these things. Some are not as explicit throughout because I believe it was assumed in both the Greek and Hebrew speaking ancient world. Specifically nationalism but the themes and verses supporting that are there and the rejection of multiracialism is quite evident. The problem I have at this point is not Christianity or anything the bible says. I’m including the OT politics here because Jesus quotes the prophets all the time, I’m not a Marcionist and believe the OT and NT shares the same spirit of the same triune God. My problem is effeminate and cowardly white men. Both characteristics are condemned in the bible, men behaving this way go to hell. My thought on this is the ‘meek shall inherit the earth’ combined with Jewish word magic, the phrase meek and mild. When you read the Greek definition of the word meek, it has nothing to do with weakness. Rather it is what you do to a horse, a big beast but under control, being tempered. Not tyrannical, not soft but patient and not slow to use force. It is a good and proper balance which has been lost on modern white men. In any case, I’m working on it in my small way. I believe more people are going to listen as time goes on so I have hope for the future. Take care and God’s blessings to you and yours.
-
Another Christian Understands.
Nov 22, 2019, 8:38 AM by Stephen Phillips (this is a masculine christian speaking of the natural law in christian prose) Hello Curt, I understand what you’re driving at here. I’m a Christian, member of a Calvinist church. I am trying to convince people around me of the same things you were mentioning here. The bible conforms to natural law, as a Christian I would say natural law is God’s will. The heirarchy of God, men, women, children, animals and the environment. Men are the head of the house snd collectively we are the head of our nation/ethnicity. The bible speaks quite plainly about most of these things. Some are not as explicit throughout because I believe it was assumed in both the Greek and Hebrew speaking ancient world. Specifically nationalism but the themes and verses supporting that are there and the rejection of multiracialism is quite evident. The problem I have at this point is not Christianity or anything the bible says. I’m including the OT politics here because Jesus quotes the prophets all the time, I’m not a Marcionist and believe the OT and NT shares the same spirit of the same triune God. My problem is effeminate and cowardly white men. Both characteristics are condemned in the bible, men behaving this way go to hell. My thought on this is the ‘meek shall inherit the earth’ combined with Jewish word magic, the phrase meek and mild. When you read the Greek definition of the word meek, it has nothing to do with weakness. Rather it is what you do to a horse, a big beast but under control, being tempered. Not tyrannical, not soft but patient and not slow to use force. It is a good and proper balance which has been lost on modern white men. In any case, I’m working on it in my small way. I believe more people are going to listen as time goes on so I have hope for the future. Take care and God’s blessings to you and yours.
-
What Is the Difference Between Morals, Ethics and Manners?
What Is the Difference Between Morals, Ethics and Manners? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/what-is-the-difference-between-morals-ethics-and-manners/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:21:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265498224481185802
-
What Is the Difference Between Morals, Ethics and Manners?
Dec 24, 2019, 3:33 PM DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS (Core) What is the difference between morals, ethics and manners? CORRECT ANSWER: It’s not complicated – if we explain it in economic rather than ‘moral’ language. Western civilization is a commercial civilization (middle class), and that is the reason for our wealth, cleanliness, orderliness, customer service, and tolerance. The west was more successful than all but the Japanese at suppression of selfish public behavior, and for this reason was able to produce commons that people did not impose costs upon, providing incentive (lacking disincentive) to produce commons, and therefore creating the high returns on the commons. (Effectively, westerners treat the commons – common spaces and everything in them – as sacred). Engage only in completely voluntary exchanges. That means do not impose costs upon others whether attention (mental), disgust(emotion), or action (body), on their demonstrated interests (things, family, business), and the “commons” anything the public may make use of. Instead, pay the cost of controlling yourself, by maintaining ‘situational awareness of others’ (consideration), especially by managing your children. The public space is not something you may make use of as you desire. it is not your home.
- Series: Hygiene > Dress > Manners > Ethics > Morals > Laws > Reciprocity
MANNERS Manners advertise fitness for reciprocity. The more costly the manners, the higher the suppression of impulse, the greater the demonstration of agency and training, the better the promise and better the predictor of fitness for reciprocity. Respect consists of using manners to demonstrate reciprocity and presumption of reciprocity regardless of differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in opinion, and differences in preferences. Disrespect consists of irreciprocity presumption of irreciprocity given differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in knowledge, habit, and opinion, and differences in preferences. Insult consists of (…) Resistance consist of (…) Defection consists of (…) || Spectrum: genetic > sexual > social > economic > political > military Display * Hygiene * Dress * MovementWord * SpeechDeed * Action
- Space
Manners signal respect by paying cost of observance, and require reciprocity by equal payment of costs of observance.
Respect refers to presumption of the spectrum of reciprocity to beneficence by your demonstration of respect for others interests, and the interest of the commons.
Manners are your ‘advertising’ for worthiness of respect. Lack of manners are your ‘advertising’ for unworthiness of respect: meaning, not giving your attention, consideration, or resources (time, energy). And poor manners require others actively disrespect you (‘punish you’) for imposing costs upon others. ETHICS (…) MORALS (…)
-
What Is the Difference Between Morals, Ethics and Manners?
Dec 24, 2019, 3:33 PM DRAFT – WORK IN PROGRESS (Core) What is the difference between morals, ethics and manners? CORRECT ANSWER: It’s not complicated – if we explain it in economic rather than ‘moral’ language. Western civilization is a commercial civilization (middle class), and that is the reason for our wealth, cleanliness, orderliness, customer service, and tolerance. The west was more successful than all but the Japanese at suppression of selfish public behavior, and for this reason was able to produce commons that people did not impose costs upon, providing incentive (lacking disincentive) to produce commons, and therefore creating the high returns on the commons. (Effectively, westerners treat the commons – common spaces and everything in them – as sacred). Engage only in completely voluntary exchanges. That means do not impose costs upon others whether attention (mental), disgust(emotion), or action (body), on their demonstrated interests (things, family, business), and the “commons” anything the public may make use of. Instead, pay the cost of controlling yourself, by maintaining ‘situational awareness of others’ (consideration), especially by managing your children. The public space is not something you may make use of as you desire. it is not your home.
- Series: Hygiene > Dress > Manners > Ethics > Morals > Laws > Reciprocity
MANNERS Manners advertise fitness for reciprocity. The more costly the manners, the higher the suppression of impulse, the greater the demonstration of agency and training, the better the promise and better the predictor of fitness for reciprocity. Respect consists of using manners to demonstrate reciprocity and presumption of reciprocity regardless of differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in opinion, and differences in preferences. Disrespect consists of irreciprocity presumption of irreciprocity given differences between parties, including differences in the status spectrum, differences in wants and needs, differences in knowledge, habit, and opinion, and differences in preferences. Insult consists of (…) Resistance consist of (…) Defection consists of (…) || Spectrum: genetic > sexual > social > economic > political > military Display * Hygiene * Dress * MovementWord * SpeechDeed * Action
- Space
Manners signal respect by paying cost of observance, and require reciprocity by equal payment of costs of observance.
Respect refers to presumption of the spectrum of reciprocity to beneficence by your demonstration of respect for others interests, and the interest of the commons.
Manners are your ‘advertising’ for worthiness of respect. Lack of manners are your ‘advertising’ for unworthiness of respect: meaning, not giving your attention, consideration, or resources (time, energy). And poor manners require others actively disrespect you (‘punish you’) for imposing costs upon others. ETHICS (…) MORALS (…)
-
“Propertarianism Consists of ….”
“Propertarianism Consists of ….” https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/propertarianism-consists-of/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:18:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265497663832821761
-
“Propertarianism Consists of ….”
Dec 26, 2019, 2:12 PM
—“This is a very vague non-answer that tries to appear smart by using a big word salad and sounds like something the typical libertarian atheist who’s sure of his own intellect would say. I still don’t understand what Propertarianism is.”— Ryan Chapman
Always an overconfident moron in the bunch. What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism? What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism? What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions? Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols? So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)? Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational. What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations). It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions). Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method. Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements. By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech. We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench). Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons. And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of. In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime. So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes. And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics. I know what the fuck I”m doing.Don’t shit on my doorstep.