Mar 14, 2020, 10:43 AM I tend to stick to definitions, incentives, the law of reciprocity and universal applicability, but this group has put out three statements about women’s pre-conscious behaviors over the past few days that are explanatory, insightful, and terrifying. The question is, can we state those behaviors under the definition of “Mankind”? Yes, I know so. Can we regulate against them in the law? I think so. Can we educate women to control them? I don’t know. And the reason I don’t know is the female bias we seek to train, evolved specifically to resist training. In case that isn’t clear, if you can’t be trained then you aren’t capable of soveriegnty under the natural law. And that has vast and dangerous consequences for ‘equal standing’ and ‘equal application’.
Theme: Reciprocity
-
But Can We Do It?
Mar 14, 2020, 10:43 AM I tend to stick to definitions, incentives, the law of reciprocity and universal applicability, but this group has put out three statements about women’s pre-conscious behaviors over the past few days that are explanatory, insightful, and terrifying. The question is, can we state those behaviors under the definition of “Mankind”? Yes, I know so. Can we regulate against them in the law? I think so. Can we educate women to control them? I don’t know. And the reason I don’t know is the female bias we seek to train, evolved specifically to resist training. In case that isn’t clear, if you can’t be trained then you aren’t capable of soveriegnty under the natural law. And that has vast and dangerous consequences for ‘equal standing’ and ‘equal application’.
-
Applied P-Law
Mar 14, 2020, 7:23 PM P-law argues against shaming and moralizing as substitute for or avoidance of argument, not as disincentive for irreciprocity (immorality). I don’t know why visiting Thai Hookers is irreciprocal with the in group. I think it puts pressure on one’s virtue signaling – meaning worthiness for imitation – because it’s a signal of low sexual social economic market value to some, but for most I think it’s just reducing the cost of sex by reducing it to purely transactional. Hookers are expensive per transaction but there are no or few external costs. Relationships have high external costs. They may have high external rewards. But only if those rewards are of subjective value to you. Long and short of it is that GSRRM is the correct response to avoiding an argument, and for suppressing virtue signaling, but that’s all. I don’t know the context but it sounds like crossing signals between different sexual value markets.
-
Applied P-Law
Mar 14, 2020, 7:23 PM P-law argues against shaming and moralizing as substitute for or avoidance of argument, not as disincentive for irreciprocity (immorality). I don’t know why visiting Thai Hookers is irreciprocal with the in group. I think it puts pressure on one’s virtue signaling – meaning worthiness for imitation – because it’s a signal of low sexual social economic market value to some, but for most I think it’s just reducing the cost of sex by reducing it to purely transactional. Hookers are expensive per transaction but there are no or few external costs. Relationships have high external costs. They may have high external rewards. But only if those rewards are of subjective value to you. Long and short of it is that GSRRM is the correct response to avoiding an argument, and for suppressing virtue signaling, but that’s all. I don’t know the context but it sounds like crossing signals between different sexual value markets.
-
Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms
Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/29/ten-commandments-in-p-law-terms/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-29 00:46:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266169025488453632
-
Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms
Mar 14, 2020, 8:02 PM (In response to James Dmitro Makienko and John Mark.) 1 – God/Nature has given us the many laws of nature, the one natural law: reciprocity, and the one choice: transcendence into gods ourselves by those laws, or the end of our existence for failing. 2 – You shall not use reciprocity falsely, or criticize reciprocity, and spread irreciprocity – this is to criticize god, god’s law, and doom mankind to failure of transcendence. 4 – You must return your parent’s investment in you with reciprocity of obedience, respect, and care. 5 – You shalt not commit murder – reciprocity of life cannot be restored, reciprocity of revenge cannot be unmade, and reciprocity in trust forever lost. 6 – You shalt not commit adultery – reciprocity of the marriage promise cannot be restored. 7 – You shalt not steal – reciprocity of goods may be restored, but reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 8 – You shalt not lie – reciprocity of deceit may be restored, reciprocity of harm may not be, and reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 9 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s wife or husband – lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of a marriage. 10 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s property, lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of property. 3 – One day a week you shall spend contemplating your reciprocity irreciprocity, to past, present and future kin and kith, and seek means of restitution. (something along those lines. should be extended to include male violence rape, female gossip, undermining. Not the shift of the third commandment to tenth place.)
-
Ten Commandments in P-Law Terms
Mar 14, 2020, 8:02 PM (In response to James Dmitro Makienko and John Mark.) 1 – God/Nature has given us the many laws of nature, the one natural law: reciprocity, and the one choice: transcendence into gods ourselves by those laws, or the end of our existence for failing. 2 – You shall not use reciprocity falsely, or criticize reciprocity, and spread irreciprocity – this is to criticize god, god’s law, and doom mankind to failure of transcendence. 4 – You must return your parent’s investment in you with reciprocity of obedience, respect, and care. 5 – You shalt not commit murder – reciprocity of life cannot be restored, reciprocity of revenge cannot be unmade, and reciprocity in trust forever lost. 6 – You shalt not commit adultery – reciprocity of the marriage promise cannot be restored. 7 – You shalt not steal – reciprocity of goods may be restored, but reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 8 – You shalt not lie – reciprocity of deceit may be restored, reciprocity of harm may not be, and reciprocity of trust cannot be restored. 9 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s wife or husband – lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of a marriage. 10 – You shalt not contemplate lust of another’s property, lest in anger, weakness or folly you violate the reciprocity of property. 3 – One day a week you shall spend contemplating your reciprocity irreciprocity, to past, present and future kin and kith, and seek means of restitution. (something along those lines. should be extended to include male violence rape, female gossip, undermining. Not the shift of the third commandment to tenth place.)
-
How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal?
How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal? https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/28/how-can-a-falsehood-be-reciprocal/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-28 21:19:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266116884715487233
-
How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal?
Mar 19, 2020, 3:46 PM 1) So the restoration of reciprocity between the genders is what you are objecting to? 2) The equal suppression of the female means of deceit and undermining so that it equals the male suppression of deceit and undermining is irreciprocal? 3) The granting of women a separate and equal political house is irreciprocal? 4) Ending community property is irreciprocal? 5) Researching artificial wombs so that males are no longer dependent upon females for reproduction is irreciprocal? 6) What civilization is more feminine than the western, and less coercive to women and the feminine than the western? (a) historically women were almost entirely uneducated, notorious gossips, shrills, and psychotics, consider the source of all evil, and it was the victorians that works to reverse that image and elevate women. (a) women were ‘convinced’ is simply counter to the historical evidence. Women wanted the vote. (b) women were liberated by men’s industrialization. (c) women displaced men in clerical and service work (easy work). (d) women spend 70% of combined income and consume 70% of government resources, while only men over 30 are net contributors to the economy. (e) women are responsible for backing and funding and advocating every major left wing pseudoscientific movement. (f) women are responsible for the continuous voting of the left, funding the left universities. HOW CAN A FALSEHOOD BE RECIPROCAL?
-
How Can a Falsehood Be Reciprocal?
Mar 19, 2020, 3:46 PM 1) So the restoration of reciprocity between the genders is what you are objecting to? 2) The equal suppression of the female means of deceit and undermining so that it equals the male suppression of deceit and undermining is irreciprocal? 3) The granting of women a separate and equal political house is irreciprocal? 4) Ending community property is irreciprocal? 5) Researching artificial wombs so that males are no longer dependent upon females for reproduction is irreciprocal? 6) What civilization is more feminine than the western, and less coercive to women and the feminine than the western? (a) historically women were almost entirely uneducated, notorious gossips, shrills, and psychotics, consider the source of all evil, and it was the victorians that works to reverse that image and elevate women. (a) women were ‘convinced’ is simply counter to the historical evidence. Women wanted the vote. (b) women were liberated by men’s industrialization. (c) women displaced men in clerical and service work (easy work). (d) women spend 70% of combined income and consume 70% of government resources, while only men over 30 are net contributors to the economy. (e) women are responsible for backing and funding and advocating every major left wing pseudoscientific movement. (f) women are responsible for the continuous voting of the left, funding the left universities. HOW CAN A FALSEHOOD BE RECIPROCAL?