Theme: Reciprocity

  • Jesus

      While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s important for mankind. Every other person who tried to deliver that message whether european, or hindu or buddhist, sinic or semite failed – spectacularly. I do true. That’s all have to do. True is always better. ALl of history is excessively concerned with good even if false. I do true. Jesus is correct because made a true claim in the only language and paradigm he understood. I don’t have that problem. I can speak in parsimonious natural law and say he spoke a truth even if not truthfully – simply because he couldn’t. Unfortunately his insight was used to destroy and decline rather than expand and improve. Which is something we can do that he couldn’t.

  • Jesus

      While Aristotle explains it, albeit doesn’t finish, as far as I know jesus gave us the only ‘scientific’ improvement on the natural law. The ONLY ONE EVER IN HISTORY. That’s why he’s important for mankind. Every other person who tried to deliver that message whether european, or hindu or buddhist, sinic or semite failed – spectacularly. I do true. That’s all have to do. True is always better. ALl of history is excessively concerned with good even if false. I do true. Jesus is correct because made a true claim in the only language and paradigm he understood. I don’t have that problem. I can speak in parsimonious natural law and say he spoke a truth even if not truthfully – simply because he couldn’t. Unfortunately his insight was used to destroy and decline rather than expand and improve. Which is something we can do that he couldn’t.

  • Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality

    Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality https://t.co/q7EMHVNLlZ

  • Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality

    Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/confusing-reciprocity-with-proportionality/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 20:50:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267196739292987395

  • Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality

    Nov 7, 2019, 9:53 AM

    —“It’s a modality of life that can go either way but has apply universally. I think we currently have the worst of both worlds. No reciprocity.”—Tyrone Jackson @cashmoneyglock

    You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law. We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance. We might argue that the state, through contractual asymmetric enforcement (bundling, optimistic presentation without warranty and responsibility-liability, entrapments, penalty clauses etc ) permits and facilitates ir-recipprocity in commerce, but we cannot make the case that the state or economy produces irreciprocal conditions. Just the opposite. I am not going to let the left ‘mal-appropriate’ Reciprocity the way they have inverted rule-of-law, liberalism, freedom, equality, into explicit lies. Morality = Reciprocity within the Limits of Proportionality. Reciprocity increases, and Disproportionality Decreases, Cohesion. The Entrepreneurial billionaires’ aren’t the problem. The multi-millionaries in the financial sector are – and every single one of them is a parasite upon our people.  

  • Confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality

    Nov 7, 2019, 9:53 AM

    —“It’s a modality of life that can go either way but has apply universally. I think we currently have the worst of both worlds. No reciprocity.”—Tyrone Jackson @cashmoneyglock

    You are confusing Reciprocity with Proportionality. We have more reciprocity in the US than anywhere on earth because we have common law. We have insufficient consumer protection (warranty,liability) especially in truthful speech (fully informed), especially in Consumer Finance. We might argue that the state, through contractual asymmetric enforcement (bundling, optimistic presentation without warranty and responsibility-liability, entrapments, penalty clauses etc ) permits and facilitates ir-recipprocity in commerce, but we cannot make the case that the state or economy produces irreciprocal conditions. Just the opposite. I am not going to let the left ‘mal-appropriate’ Reciprocity the way they have inverted rule-of-law, liberalism, freedom, equality, into explicit lies. Morality = Reciprocity within the Limits of Proportionality. Reciprocity increases, and Disproportionality Decreases, Cohesion. The Entrepreneurial billionaires’ aren’t the problem. The multi-millionaries in the financial sector are – and every single one of them is a parasite upon our people.  

  • Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It

    Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/31/words-are-terms-of-contracts-for-reciprocity-or-frauds-to-avoid-it/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-31 20:46:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267195814750957568

  • Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It

    Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It https://t.co/1d15lZ7VXv

  • Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It

    Words are contracts for meaning in pursuit of reciprocity, or they are avoidance of contracts for meaning, in pursuit of irreciprocity: fraud. There is only one universal standard of weight and measure in speech, providing universal decidability in speech, and that is testimony in of the operational, empirical, internally consistent, coherent, complete, and surviving parsimony in competition with the alternatives. Lke all humans I make mistakes. Unlike most humans I never err. This claim is not difficult: claim nothing is true you cannot testify to. Position all that you cannot testify to as a question rather than a statement. 😉 -cheers

  • Words Are Terms of Contracts for Reciprocity or Frauds to Avoid It

    Words are contracts for meaning in pursuit of reciprocity, or they are avoidance of contracts for meaning, in pursuit of irreciprocity: fraud. There is only one universal standard of weight and measure in speech, providing universal decidability in speech, and that is testimony in of the operational, empirical, internally consistent, coherent, complete, and surviving parsimony in competition with the alternatives. Lke all humans I make mistakes. Unlike most humans I never err. This claim is not difficult: claim nothing is true you cannot testify to. Position all that you cannot testify to as a question rather than a statement. 😉 -cheers