Theme: Reciprocity

  • Not an argument. But then, yet again, you confirm the evidence, the research, an

    Not an argument. But then, yet again, you confirm the evidence, the research, and my argument: the vast majority of women cannot distinguish between truth and desirability, reciprocity and proportionality, opinion and testimony.

    You lack agency, and it inhibits your reason.

    Reply addressees: @patacar

  • I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, o

    I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, and full accounting. So, sorry. It’s a sort of equal-opportunity methodology for slaying sacred cows regardless of race, creed or culture.

    Truth has no mercy.

    Learn P-Law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 03:49:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269838938304393217

  • I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, o

    I do natural law of reciprocity, and testimonial truth by realism, naturalism, operationalism, empiricism, and full accounting. So, sorry. It’s a sort of equal-opportunity methodology for slaying sacred cows regardless of race, creed or culture.

    Truth has no mercy.

    Learn P-Law.

  • I don’t do ideology. I do strictly constructed natural law. 😉

    I don’t do ideology. I do strictly constructed natural law. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 02:07:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269813177392549888

    Reply addressees: @Slamdrew666wow @compassionsays @SamHarrisOrg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269812566068465671

  • I don’t do ideology. I do strictly constructed natural law. 😉

    I don’t do ideology. I do strictly constructed natural law. 😉

    Reply addressees: @Slamdrew666wow @compassionsays @SamHarrisOrg

  • Are you lying? (Yes.) There is no obfuscation to demand for separation so that w

    Are you lying? (Yes.) There is no obfuscation to demand for separation so that we can leave you empirically ‘unfit’ for European Civilization (Truth before face, Reciprocity, Self Sufficiency, Capitalization) behind.
    That’s not Genocide. It’s the opposite: It’s Self Defense.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 19:53:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269719185191559169

    Reply addressees: @Slamdrew666wow @compassionsays @SamHarrisOrg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269717357988941825

  • Are you lying? (Yes.) There is no obfuscation to demand for separation so that w

    Are you lying? (Yes.) There is no obfuscation to demand for separation so that we can leave you empirically ‘unfit’ for European Civilization (Truth before face, Reciprocity, Self Sufficiency, Capitalization) behind.
    That’s not Genocide. It’s the opposite: It’s Self Defense.

    Reply addressees: @Slamdrew666wow @compassionsays @SamHarrisOrg

  • The Enemy’s Strategy

    [J]ust as Europeans use a deliberate strategy of sovereignty, reciprocity, testimonial speech, in adversarial competition, to discover the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and apply them to innovation, competition, and markets, using evidence, reason, empiricism, science, and mathematics, the enemy uses a deliberate strategy to destroy european civilization: The expansion of the technique invented by usury into a group strategy for the destruction of civilizations, and the reversal of human evolution, restoring man to condition of animal: Baiting into Hazard, by use of False Promise, Argued by Sophism, Under cover of Moral Pretense, Justified by Critique, for the purpose of profiting from undermining truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political has been consumed by expansion of the underclasses whose reproduction had been limited by productivity, law, property, market, natural aristocracy. This techniqu reflects he female group strategy of undermining organizations of males that are producing eugenic civilization (quality), by the direction of proceeds of production to the production of returns on commons, at the expense of female dysgenic reproduction (quantity), and her irresistible hyper-consumption. A list the false promises of the enemy? It’s a long list. In the modern world alone, it’s Marxism, communism socialism, cosmopolitanism, universalism, one-world government, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denial, and political correctness. Together those movements are a conspiracy to destroy our western civilization – our civilization that both discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and in doing so dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, and disease, in a few hundred years in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, is oppressive – where all other civilizations, have, or are, running down the opportunity-clock, have either stagnated or declined, because they have failed to discover and adhere to physical, natural, and evolutionary law. Just as primitive man anthropomorphizes natural phenomena, creates animistic religion, and women, Jews, use the Alinsky of method of personalizing a political position, by the strategy of ‘personalize white civilization for their primitivism: a rejection of physical natural and evolutionary laws. We are in the process of the second semitic dark age – just as the jews brought the false promises of monotheism to the empire and destroyed the institutions, religion, temples, academies, knowledge, arts, of the ancient european world, and the Muslims destroyed the same of the great civilizations of the ancient world: North Africa, Egypt, the Levant, Mesopotamia, Persia, northwest India, Anatolia, and eventually Byzantium. That is the complete understanding of our current crisis: the war by the middle east primitives, led by their ((( intellectual ))) class’s verbal advantage, to destroy civilization. They are not happy to cause stagnation. They are not happy to cause decline. They are not happy to run down the clock in this brief period of geological, solar, galactic peace, in a universe increasingly evidently hostile to advanced life. Given the evidence of the consistency of the technique, in the ancient, medieval, and modern worlds – each and every time we have let them among us – whether their destruction of civilization is a genetic intuition, a cultural habit, or intentional design, or all of the above. But it doesn’t matter. Plausible deniability is lost. One cannot specialize in undermining cooperation within a people, fomenting rebellion by those lacking agency, with sophisticated deceits that promise freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by personalizing those that follow physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and fail to reform without genetic interests, cultural habituation, of intentional strategy any more than europeans can do so with their adherence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. We have a choice: to continue to be the only civilization that discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and raises mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death, or to fail like all other peoples, stagnate, and decline, because our men lacked the will to save our people, and by consequence our race, and by consequence mankind, and by consequence, our opportunity to evolve into the gods we imagined.

  • The Enemy’s Strategy

    [J]ust as Europeans use a deliberate strategy of sovereignty, reciprocity, testimonial speech, in adversarial competition, to discover the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and apply them to innovation, competition, and markets, using evidence, reason, empiricism, science, and mathematics, the enemy uses a deliberate strategy to destroy european civilization: The expansion of the technique invented by usury into a group strategy for the destruction of civilizations, and the reversal of human evolution, restoring man to condition of animal: Baiting into Hazard, by use of False Promise, Argued by Sophism, Under cover of Moral Pretense, Justified by Critique, for the purpose of profiting from undermining truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes, creating conflict, destroying trust, generating demand for authority, that recursively issues another iteration of false promise, until all accumulated genetic, cultural, normative, artistic, economic, institutional and political has been consumed by expansion of the underclasses whose reproduction had been limited by productivity, law, property, market, natural aristocracy. This techniqu reflects he female group strategy of undermining organizations of males that are producing eugenic civilization (quality), by the direction of proceeds of production to the production of returns on commons, at the expense of female dysgenic reproduction (quantity), and her irresistible hyper-consumption. A list the false promises of the enemy? It’s a long list. In the modern world alone, it’s Marxism, communism socialism, cosmopolitanism, universalism, one-world government, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denial, and political correctness. Together those movements are a conspiracy to destroy our western civilization – our civilization that both discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and in doing so dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, and disease, in a few hundred years in the bronze, iron, and steel ages, is oppressive – where all other civilizations, have, or are, running down the opportunity-clock, have either stagnated or declined, because they have failed to discover and adhere to physical, natural, and evolutionary law. Just as primitive man anthropomorphizes natural phenomena, creates animistic religion, and women, Jews, use the Alinsky of method of personalizing a political position, by the strategy of ‘personalize white civilization for their primitivism: a rejection of physical natural and evolutionary laws. We are in the process of the second semitic dark age – just as the jews brought the false promises of monotheism to the empire and destroyed the institutions, religion, temples, academies, knowledge, arts, of the ancient european world, and the Muslims destroyed the same of the great civilizations of the ancient world: North Africa, Egypt, the Levant, Mesopotamia, Persia, northwest India, Anatolia, and eventually Byzantium. That is the complete understanding of our current crisis: the war by the middle east primitives, led by their ((( intellectual ))) class’s verbal advantage, to destroy civilization. They are not happy to cause stagnation. They are not happy to cause decline. They are not happy to run down the clock in this brief period of geological, solar, galactic peace, in a universe increasingly evidently hostile to advanced life. Given the evidence of the consistency of the technique, in the ancient, medieval, and modern worlds – each and every time we have let them among us – whether their destruction of civilization is a genetic intuition, a cultural habit, or intentional design, or all of the above. But it doesn’t matter. Plausible deniability is lost. One cannot specialize in undermining cooperation within a people, fomenting rebellion by those lacking agency, with sophisticated deceits that promise freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by personalizing those that follow physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and fail to reform without genetic interests, cultural habituation, of intentional strategy any more than europeans can do so with their adherence to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. We have a choice: to continue to be the only civilization that discovers and adheres to physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and raises mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, and early death, or to fail like all other peoples, stagnate, and decline, because our men lacked the will to save our people, and by consequence our race, and by consequence mankind, and by consequence, our opportunity to evolve into the gods we imagined.

  • TRUTH REGARDLESS OF COST” I have to use the truth without compromise regardless

    :TRUTH REGARDLESS OF COST”

    I have to use the truth without compromise regardless of cost. We can make explicit tolerances and exceptions for the un-testimonial and irreciprocal, but we cannot violate reciprocity by stating untruths without violating the promise of the law: in-group reciprocity in display word and deed, regardless of cost. It doesn’t matter if we turn people away. If they are unfit for the truth, unfit for the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, then they are unfit for transcendence into the gods we imagine – and must be either left behind, or ruled, so that they cannot prohibit our transcendence into the gods we imagine.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-07 12:42:00 UTC