I TEACH CLASS ON WESTERN CIV ALL DAY LONG.
The only price is reciprocity and intellectual honesty
For most, it’s tuition they can’t afford. 😉
Theme: Reciprocity
-
I TEACH CLASS ON WESTERN CIV ALL DAY LONG. The only price is reciprocity and int
-
Western Rule of Law grants self-determination (citizenship) to those who demonst
Western Rule of Law grants self-determination (citizenship) to those who demonstrate self-determination, self-sufficiency, and the absence of irreciprocity. This limits political participation (via-positiva force) to those who have demonstrated self-determination.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 16:54:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316059630968156160
-
Western civilization has a price of entry: Reciprocity of Self Determination in
Western civilization has a price of entry: Reciprocity of Self Determination in Display, Word, and Deed. You are either capable of paying this price of membership or you are not. No one decides for you. You demonstrate your capability or not. If you can’t you can’t, you can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 16:48:15 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105028497937542786
-
Western civilization has a price of entry: Reciprocity of Self Determination in
Western civilization has a price of entry: Reciprocity of Self Determination in Display, Word, and Deed. You are either capable of paying this price of membership or you are not. No one decides for you. You demonstrate your capability or not. If you can’t you can’t, you can’t.
-
Western civilization has a price of entry: Reciprocity of Self Determination in
Western civilization has a price of entry: Reciprocity of Self Determination in Display, Word, and Deed. You are either capable of paying this price of membership or you are not. No one decides for you. You demonstrate your capability or not. If you can’t you can’t, you can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 16:47:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316057925312548867
-
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).” https://t.co/PT98X4hYad -
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).” https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1315995271994707968
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 13:01:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316001145710678018
-
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).”
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-13 13:00:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1316000922183630849
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315995271994707968
-
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a viola
FALSE FRAMING: They aren’t arguing FOR IT, they’re arguing that it’s not a violation of positive law (authority). Why the dispute? The constitution presumes Natural Law (reciprocity).
The people have been intentionally deceived by you and yours.
“No more pilpul (lies).”
Reply addressees: @mattyglesias -
Following incentives is rather simple. Humans always and everywhere follow incen
Following incentives is rather simple.
Humans always and everywhere follow incentives.
And make excuses for having done so.
The only excuse is reciprocity.
Reciprocity is antithetical to the left.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-12 15:59:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315683548012126214
Reply addressees: @Sarpicus @ramzpaul
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1315683162643726338
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Sarpicus @ramzpaul All knowledge that is non-tautological is theoretical. The question is only whether it is consistent, correspondent, and operationally possible. And if operationally possible whether it adheres to rational human incentives where Left=Theft + Dysgenic vs Right=Merit + Eugenic.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1315683162643726338