Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • 2. Anglo and Germanic, and ancient european law are scientific, and empirical, a

    2. Anglo and Germanic, and ancient european law are scientific, and empirical, and calculated by market competition with but one principle: sovereignty reciprocity truth and duty. Judges promise neutral administration. Priests neutral non aggression.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-15 04:41:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349939679307694082

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349939677437042688

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    1. Muslim, Jewish, and French (Napoleonic, Continental) Law are ‘visions of the anointed’. Rule by scholars(code) and theologians(priests, rabbis, mullah’s). They demand both positiva directives and negativa prohibitions.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1349939677437042688

  • Newt: We either have reciprocity in society, and equal protection under the law,

    Newt: We either have reciprocity in society, and equal protection under the law, or there is no rule of law nor morality in that law or Government. Our civ has been in war since the 50s. And bill for restoring Civility, Reciprocity, Testimony, is due with interest – in blood.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-14 19:34:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349802103993151490

    Reply addressees: @newtgingrich @SteveScalise

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349784203655831555

  • Shifting my opinion on Catholicism a bit, in that church dogma produced what is

    Shifting my opinion on Catholicism a bit, in that church dogma produced what is very close to a system of natural law sufficient to unify families, clans, tribes and nations of PEASANTS to compete with the families, tribes, states of ARISTOCRACY. But the Nobility captured Church.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-14 18:17:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349782832277839872

  • The Laws of the Universe .. The Formal, Physical, Natural(Behavior), Evolutionar

    The Laws of the Universe
    .. The Formal, Physical, Natural(Behavior), Evolutionary Laws
    .. .. The Natural Law of Cooperation
    .. .. .. The Natural Law of Conflict Resolution(Reciprocity)
    .. .. .. .. The Natural Law of Tort(Property)
    .. .. .. .. .. The Common Law
    –> The US Const.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-14 18:12:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349781496190664706

  • You’re absolutely going to turn ‘never again’ into ‘again for certain’. Demonstr

    You’re absolutely going to turn ‘never again’ into ‘again for certain’.

    Demonstrate reciprocity between your people’s agents in Leftism, 70’s bombings, BLM, Antifa, ADL/SPLC, and the Soros collective, vs the Right’s patriots.

    I’ve been trying to stop it.
    You pour gas on it.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-13 18:09:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349418313374457860

    Reply addressees: @ezraklein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349414272787365893

  • Law is as Damaged by The Jews as The Other Natural Sciences.

    This is painful. No. Obscurantism and common sophism, and all to common. 1. “Natural Law” (moral, philosophical) (the law is sovereign)-> Natural Law (scientific: reciprocity) 2. Evolutionary Law (People Are Sovereign)(European pre continental and present common law) 3. Common-Law Originalism-Textualism (the democratic polity is sovereign) the purpose is to fore the people and legislature into responsible action. 4. Political Law (Academics, The State is Sovereign) -> Continental Law by Codes 5. Kritarchy (rule by judges, judges decide sovereignty)(Jewish Law) -> Positive Law Legal strategies are demarcated by different allocations of responsibility for decidability. Raz, Kelsen Dworkin and Hartt all come to us and write from the non-european tradition of interpretive scriptural, leal tradition of rabbinical law, that is constantly revised by judges, from their interpretation of a just society at the time. Social Law, Judicial legislation from the bench, that adapts to conditions. Europeans, the founders, and of course, Scalia, come from the ancient European tradition of tort (reciprocity), trifunctionalism, legal neutrality, legal record as evidence, and the responsibility of the polity to steer the direction of society – not the judiciary. The law of peers. Why? The foundation of european law consists in the reciprocal exchange of insurance of defense of self-determination by self-determined means, limiting us to sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, duty of performance and care, and adversarial (competitive, adaptive, an evolutionary) markets in all aspects of life. It will take us another fifty years to recover from the damage Raz, Kelsen Dworkin and Hart just as it will take another fifty to recover from the damage of the Marxists in political economy, neo-marxists in aesthetics and culture, postmodernists from sophistry, and Gould Freud and Boaz in pseudoscience. Because of these men, we’ve trained three generations of legal activists to undermine the constitution, the common law, and the long history of european empirical jurisprudence. Exasperating.

  • Law is as Damaged by The Jews as The Other Natural Sciences.

    This is painful. No. Obscurantism and common sophism, and all to common. 1. “Natural Law” (moral, philosophical) (the law is sovereign)-> Natural Law (scientific: reciprocity) 2. Evolutionary Law (People Are Sovereign)(European pre continental and present common law) 3. Common-Law Originalism-Textualism (the democratic polity is sovereign) the purpose is to fore the people and legislature into responsible action. 4. Political Law (Academics, The State is Sovereign) -> Continental Law by Codes 5. Kritarchy (rule by judges, judges decide sovereignty)(Jewish Law) -> Positive Law Legal strategies are demarcated by different allocations of responsibility for decidability. Raz, Kelsen Dworkin and Hartt all come to us and write from the non-european tradition of interpretive scriptural, leal tradition of rabbinical law, that is constantly revised by judges, from their interpretation of a just society at the time. Social Law, Judicial legislation from the bench, that adapts to conditions. Europeans, the founders, and of course, Scalia, come from the ancient European tradition of tort (reciprocity), trifunctionalism, legal neutrality, legal record as evidence, and the responsibility of the polity to steer the direction of society – not the judiciary. The law of peers. Why? The foundation of european law consists in the reciprocal exchange of insurance of defense of self-determination by self-determined means, limiting us to sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, duty of performance and care, and adversarial (competitive, adaptive, an evolutionary) markets in all aspects of life. It will take us another fifty years to recover from the damage Raz, Kelsen Dworkin and Hart just as it will take another fifty to recover from the damage of the Marxists in political economy, neo-marxists in aesthetics and culture, postmodernists from sophistry, and Gould Freud and Boaz in pseudoscience. Because of these men, we’ve trained three generations of legal activists to undermine the constitution, the common law, and the long history of european empirical jurisprudence. Exasperating.

  • JURISPRUDENCE Schools teach this badly: “Natural Law” … Natural Law (scientifi

    JURISPRUDENCE
    Schools teach this badly:
    “Natural Law”
    … Natural Law (scientific) – what I do
    Evolutionary Law (People)(Europe)
    … Common Law Originalism-Textualism
    Political Law (Academics)
    … Continental Law by Codes
    Kritarchy (rule by judges)(Jews)
    … Positive Law

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-13 06:32:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349242786898456576

  • All pretense of Altruism (Positive) or Forgiveness (Negative) consists of forbea

    All pretense of Altruism (Positive) or Forgiveness (Negative) consists of forbearance by reciprocity to the individual, group, or the group’s division of labor.

    (@LukeWeinhagen)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-12 21:41:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349109238019354626

  • Q:”Is it moral to use the power of government to impose moral standards? At what level of government? Whose standards? If your answer is “sometimes” where do you draw the line?”

    THE CORRECT ANSWER Just as we can know negative freedoms but not positive freedoms we can know negative morality but not positive morality. Why? Because negative morality is a universal: “reciprocity over time within the limits of proportionality” or its inverse “irreciprocity” is as impossible to counter as “all choice is rational given the knowledge and incentives of the actor at a time”, and “people always pursue self rational interest within the limits of their knowledge and incentives” All of these are necessary truths and perspectives on the same scientific and logical necessity. However, what constitutes morality (reciprocity) given any set of resources, economy, traditions, norms, at any point in time between any particular individuals or groups, may vary – although by predictable properties such as technological development, economic development and organization, the resulting social political and military organization. So this logic is constant across all people across all time, because it is a necessity of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws: Negative: Silver Rule: Do not unto others as they would not have done unto them Positive: Bronze Rule: Do unto others only as they would have done unto them. Positive: Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have done unto you. Negative Freedom: that which we can reciprocally not do to each other (prohibition on imposing costs upon others.) Positive Freedom: that which we can irreciprocally do to each other (freedom to impose costs upon others). Negative: Immorality refers to irreciprocity in display word and deed. Positive: Morality refers to “reciprocity in display word and deed over time and within the limits of proportionality” Negative: humans never act irrationally against their self-interests given their knowledge in time. Positive: humans always demonstrate rational self-interest over time, given their knowledge at the time. ERGO: Yes, it is rational, and moral, for governments to impose ANY standard of measure that is NOT FALSE OR IRRECIPROCAL. Most moral constraints limit some form of personal consumption of the commons or require some form of personal investment in the commons, where the commons consist of physical assets, institutional processes and procedures, and traditional, normative rules of behavior that facilitate cooperation.