RT @ThruTheHayes: COMPLEX NOT COMPLICATED
Irreciprocity must see restitution paid or debt accrues.
Debt accrues in the form of retaliation…
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-19 17:15:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1417171261688516621
So Austrian econ = social science: Law(reciprocity), Freshwater econ = political sicence (insurance), and Saltwater econ = involuntary transfer (crime).
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-18 16:26:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1416796523640274951
Reply addressees: @Xeresdk @Lord_Keynes2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1416415878841868293
Correct.
It’s nothing to do with capitalism. It is however a violation of natural (scientific) law to create an artificial scarcity of air, water, food, and energy. It forces a tradeoff without adding value. The question is moral, strategic, and military, not economic.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-18 16:25:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1416796222489251842
Reply addressees: @Xeresdk @Lord_Keynes2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1416415878841868293
Then why would anyone object to P-Law? https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1416065879243173888
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-16 16:03:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1416066008461324289
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1416065879243173888
lol…. between you and me, it’s an intentional aspect of brand control: “I’m human too. Just like everyone else. I don’t have any odd incentives. I just want truth and reciprocity in life. 😉 “
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-13 16:33:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1414986312994676744
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1414977655338848260
Smart positioning. NPP vs NAP
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 21:26:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411436127811158025
Reply addressees: @WesternRenaiss2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411432578867859456
Wrong question. Can humans produce a condition of reciprocity and proportionality, with a system of rules we call the law, and a system of organizations that facilitate cooperation and dispute resolution? Then yes. The problem is preventing parasitism. Libertarianism=parasitism.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 21:18:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411434194102853636
Reply addressees: @RickyBobby_USA @NSKinsella
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411433332332797955
I avoid psychologisms. And I dont know how to disambiguate that term into a meaningful spectrum of measurement. What are they seeking to acquire and is it true+reciprocal? We tend to see anything attention-seeking as narcissism and they see our elitism similarly.
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 20:18:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411419170990874629
Reply addressees: @aldafa_ir
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411418262089256960
… of freedom from physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws? (Meaning: Scarcity, amorality, self-interest, reciprocity, proportionality, mutation, genetic load, the necessity of natural selection, and necessity of defeating the red queen?) https://t.co/f8EJZwXhA1
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414326234292229
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414322169929728
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
13. Isn’t rothbardianism a false promise of freedom from the physical laws of the universe: the logical, the physical, the behavioral, and the evolutionary? So isn’t rothbardianism simply an evolution of marxism, which is a false promise (Fraud) … https://t.co/PNSjOg6QsI
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414322169929728
11. Does argumentation ethics presuppose anything other than a preexisting interest in avoiding violence? (Genghis Khan, nor I,care about your definition of property, ‘rights’ or justice). In other words, why does Hoppe evade the first question of why not kill, rape, conquer?
Source date (UTC): 2021-07-03 19:59:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414317740793869
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1411414316130131969
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
10. And, doesn’t every group develop a group evolutionary strategy, a mythology embodying it, ‘logic’ (method) of arguing for and defending it, and a set of norms traditions valuse an institutions using that strategy, mythology, and method? https://t.co/qMujmA5iYj
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1411414316130131969