Playing the race card instead of the truth card.
Is musk trying to restore truthful reciprocal discourse that makes democratic polities possible?
Yes. So why undermine him other than to socially construct a distraction, deceit, fraud?
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 19:58:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522304629299728384
Reply addressees: @x_matter @TheLaurenChen @nytimes
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522246841185746944
RT @ThruTheHayes: @WalterIII @curtdoolittle The law of cooperation.
The law of transcendence.
The law of just equilibration.
…via a valu…
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 11:56:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522183346838773762
RT @ThruTheHayes: THE ONLY LAW IS NATURAL LAW
The rest is legislated collective preference.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-05 02:47:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1522045255713017857
I really don’t wanna go there. but technically speaking right requires responsibility. So the child has a right as soon as he has a responsibility. Instead, we use the test of reciprocity rather than right. So we wouldn’t have wanted it done to us, and therefore don’t do it.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-03 14:44:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521500928121126913
Reply addressees: @Michell88086442
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521500096671670272
That is because the first principle of what you call ‘freedom’, and 5000 years of european law, is ‘the demand for reciprocal insurance by force of arms, of sovereignty in demonstrated interest and reciprocity in display word and deed.” It’s the real ‘first’ amendment.
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-03 13:27:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521481652085604352
Reply addressees: @HrhOrchid @bopinion @GallupNews @MikeBloomberg
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521479393897496577
— “Me refusing to carry your cost is not a demand, even if my refusal restores a burden to you.” — Luke Weinghagen.
“Responsibility means carrying your own costs.”
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-02 17:23:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1521178571905159171
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @juniorwolf @bryanbrey @ThruTheHayes @curtdoolittle @StevePender @GoodDudesShow Just so.
Reciprocal conflict resolution…
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-01 18:26:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520831980400791553
Without Aryan rule of law of the natural law of reciprocity between warriors, the Christian rule of law of reciprocity between commoners would not have been possible. Christianity is an inversion of the European Bible “Epic Cycle” converting warrior Achilles into prophet Jesus. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1520823059946610688
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-01 17:53:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520823768649715714
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1520823059946610688
(Just pls don’t overstate my words by placing Christianity (the positive) above empirical rule of law by the natural law (the negative). Both are required. Aquinas understood. We needed another of him by 1850. Our churches and theologians failed us. The academy took them over.)
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-01 17:50:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520823059946610688
Reply addressees: @dave007lee @JoshuaLisec
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520812673688117249
Just remember that the west required BOTH european rule of law of the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity for the aristocracy as well as christian love and forgiveness for the rest. This COMBINATION is how the west won over the rest, not how IT was won. 😉 https://t.co/trukRrihe5
Source date (UTC): 2022-05-01 00:21:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520559112727273475
Reply addressees: @DoomMetalMachi1 @JoshuaLisec
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1520551173928882176