The Rules of Engagement aren’t defensive enough for police. 1-Non-Aggression, 2-Non-Interference, 3-Non-Resistance, and 4-Shoot-First Violated will quickly end the Democratic, Radical Leftist, ANTIFA-BLM Organized Crime Against the Commons Syndicate. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1288503675682463746
9mm pistols are sufficient and easier to handle in crowds. Rules of engagement need to be changed to zero tolerance for aggression against life, transit, and property; zero tolerance to resistance to police command; and zero tolerance for displays of offensive or defensive gear.
9mm pistols are sufficient and easier to handle in crowds. Rules of engagement need to be changed to zero tolerance for aggression against life, transit, and property; zero tolerance to resistance to police command; and zero tolerance for displays of offensive or defensive gear.
photos_and_videos/MobileUploads_lTr6tULrvg/109741711_339272857470874_478643097822134118_n_339272854137541.jpg John mark did in no way repudiate propertarianism- just the opposite. He said so in his final post on Patreon that’s still up.
Instead we both repudiated the dissident right as hopeless chimps – and that our 18 month effort to make those subhuman animals into a political movement couldn’t succeed. Just like every other attempt failed by everyone else.
No matter what we do, what our goals what our solutions or what our tactics if the chimps don’t get schoolyard brawls to watch vicariously from behind the safety of your basement keyboards they’ll just do all they know how to do – and that’s fling ape feces at everyone who tries.
So we gave up on them. Too dumb. And so we shift back to policy, patriots, normiecons, 2A, militia, and take advantage of the fact that chimps’ve given us media legitimacy by hating us. Which is the only strategic value they (cowards) can provide. 😉
And yes I really enjoy disrespecting the mouth breathers. I’d rather pander to the enemy and insult them while appealing to men who shut up, and show up for a war we can win on our terms while the morons hand victory to the enemy playing constantly into their hands, traps, and baiting.
Which we obviously didn’t. And they were too stupid to get it. 😉
And yes, John mark videos are on the Propertarian institute channel on YouTube.
(Secret: John is to P Institute as Pam the CBS Executive was to Craig Ferguson’s Late Night. Marketers are easily hired. But in our case monetization has to pay fir them. At 100k, we only hit 1/2 the necessary market to do that. And the institute can’t get in a position where we are dependent on donors capable of funding that kind of production quality. So when you find out your marketing strategy is largely pulling in the attention of enemies, and only 1% quality people, then it’s a simple business decision: Shift to more substantive content, patriots, 2A, and adults who will spread our policy advice, and distance ourselves from the illiterate sh-t flinging white chimps.
I feel a lot more relaxed now that we’ve done that. I started an intellectual movement. It’s worked and it’s working. But it will work better when counter signaling the dissident right chimps, addressing adults, and feeding the militias and activists content.
Right wing Chimps are … tiring.John mark did in no way repudiate propertarianism- just the opposite. He said so in his final post on Patreon that’s still up.
Instead we both repudiated the dissident right as hopeless chimps – and that our 18 month effort to make those subhuman animals into a political movement couldn’t succeed. Just like every other attempt failed by everyone else.
No matter what we do, what our goals what our solutions or what our tactics if the chimps don’t get schoolyard brawls to watch vicariously from behind the safety of your basement keyboards they’ll just do all they know how to do – and that’s fling ape feces at everyone who tries.
So we gave up on them. Too dumb. And so we shift back to policy, patriots, normiecons, 2A, militia, and take advantage of the fact that chimps’ve given us media legitimacy by hating us. Which is the only strategic value they (cowards) can provide. 😉
And yes I really enjoy disrespecting the mouth breathers. I’d rather pander to the enemy and insult them while appealing to men who shut up, and show up for a war we can win on our terms while the morons hand victory to the enemy playing constantly into their hands, traps, and baiting.
Which we obviously didn’t. And they were too stupid to get it. 😉
And yes, John mark videos are on the Propertarian institute channel on YouTube.
(Secret: John is to P Institute as Pam the CBS Executive was to Craig Ferguson’s Late Night. Marketers are easily hired. But in our case monetization has to pay fir them. At 100k, we only hit 1/2 the necessary market to do that. And the institute can’t get in a position where we are dependent on donors capable of funding that kind of production quality. So when you find out your marketing strategy is largely pulling in the attention of enemies, and only 1% quality people, then it’s a simple business decision: Shift to more substantive content, patriots, 2A, and adults who will spread our policy advice, and distance ourselves from the illiterate sh-t flinging white chimps.
I feel a lot more relaxed now that we’ve done that. I started an intellectual movement. It’s worked and it’s working. But it will work better when counter signaling the dissident right chimps, addressing adults, and feeding the militias and activists content.
Libertarianism – Common Property Version of Private Property Marxism https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/27/libertarianism-common-property-version-of-private-property-marxism/
—“The problem with libertarianism is that libertarians don’t agree on what libertarianism means. Some libertarians say that if you truly believe in the non-aggression principle then you must be an anarchist. Other libertarians say that anarchists are not libertarians. Wanting to abolish the state vs. minimize it is a big Some libertarians say that being a libertarian is about minding your own business and not judging other people’s lifestyles. Other libertarians say that libertarianism is solely about the role of the state. Which one is it?”— Julie Borowski
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestion: any idiot will agree he wants to be free of aggression. But every idiot will also substitute his definition of property(interests) to aggress against. Ergo, the statement is absolutely meaningless.
Rothbardian ethics of Ghetto and Pale, were designed with malice of forethought NOT to equal European rule of law of reciprocity in interests both public and private. So that the Jewish method of fraud by baiting into hazard could persist, and European retaliation prohibited.
There is only one source of liberty, and that is armed men with sufficient force to demand rule of law by self-determination, legal sovereignty, by reciprocity, adjudicated in an adversarial market(jury) of peers. Jews never had sovereignty, liberty, and never used reciprocity.
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law, and commons – because it’s another fraud like marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, and neoconservatism. It’s bait, argued by suggestion, to lure well-meaning fools into the hazard of failure.
—“The problem with libertarianism is that libertarians don’t agree on what libertarianism means. Some libertarians say that if you truly believe in the non-aggression principle then you must be an anarchist. Other libertarians say that anarchists are not libertarians. Wanting to abolish the state vs. minimize it is a big Some libertarians say that being a libertarian is about minding your own business and not judging other people’s lifestyles. Other libertarians say that libertarianism is solely about the role of the state. Which one is it?”— Julie Borowski
“Non Aggression Principle” is an incomplete sentence, that deceives by suggestion: any idiot will agree he wants to be free of aggression. But every idiot will also substitute his definition of property(interests) to aggress against. Ergo, the statement is absolutely meaningless.
Rothbardian ethics of Ghetto and Pale, were designed with malice of forethought NOT to equal European rule of law of reciprocity in interests both public and private. So that the Jewish method of fraud by baiting into hazard could persist, and European retaliation prohibited.
There is only one source of liberty, and that is armed men with sufficient force to demand rule of law by self-determination, legal sovereignty, by reciprocity, adjudicated in an adversarial market(jury) of peers. Jews never had sovereignty, liberty, and never used reciprocity.
So stop advocating Jewish libertarianism’s war against reciprocity, rule of law, and commons – because it’s another fraud like marxism, postmodernism, anti-male-feminism, and neoconservatism. It’s bait, argued by suggestion, to lure well-meaning fools into the hazard of failure.