Theme: Property

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: ECONOMICS IS TO MAXIMAZE RETURN ON INVESTMENT (in order to do

    RT @ThruTheHayes: ECONOMICS IS TO MAXIMAZE RETURN ON INVESTMENT
    (in order to do that you must perform a full accounting of property en toto…


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 20:00:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1354157266371555328

  • Depends on your priorities. 1) Reciprocity in display word and deed includes tes

    Depends on your priorities.
    1) Reciprocity in display word and deed includes testimony.
    2) Reciprocity PLUS property-in-toto (demonstrated interests)
    3) Testimony (scientific metho) is where all the dept and insight is: grammars, performative truth, operational language, etc.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-24 16:54:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353385766148337665

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353368292669480960

  • It’s possible to fix demographics. Not reproduction w/o (a) ending community pro

    It’s possible to fix demographics. Not reproduction w/o (a) ending community property, limiting marriage to power of attorney (b) restoring fault in divorce (c) restoring liability for interference in marriage (d) ending child support, alimony, welfare (e) eugenic sterilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 18:44:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352326142145998850

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352324807031836673

  • Well, you cant put the genii back in the bottle. What we think of traditional so

    Well, you cant put the genii back in the bottle. What we think of traditional society evolved under agrarianism to keep the peace by redistributing Land, Labor, and Reproduction. Children are serfs and married women got some. Each age change ALL relationships.

    Farmers are gone.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 18:07:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352316845764784130

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352310682192994314

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • FAKE NEWS 1) We live in a republic under rule of law, the common law, and, and t

    FAKE NEWS
    1) We live in a republic under rule of law, the common law, and, and the common law, by the natural law (Tort).
    2) Majoritarian voting does not grant you Rights to convert a republic under rule of law to a democracy (mob rule) by sedition.
    3) Nor does immigration.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-17 23:52:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1350954066508177408

    Reply addressees: @insidernews

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1350848151058604037

  • This is an empirical legal statement about the properties of the product and exp

    This is an empirical legal statement about the properties of the product and explains the innovation the product provides. That said, it has the same dependencies as a stock, at lower transaction costs, and lacks the liquidity, insurability, and survivability of currency or money


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-10 23:42:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1348414981809778689

    Reply addressees: @21MillionKings @johnrobb

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1348414231406907396


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @21MillionKings @johnrobb You’re not very bright.
    I’m happy to promote BTC.
    I merely state the truth:
    It’s a divisible share in the BTC network.
    Operationally dependent on it.
    Surviving by demand alone.
    It may be classified as Token Money.
    It’s not money or a money substitute.
    It’s an investment vehicle.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1348414231406907396

  • propertarians Propertarians /curtdoolittleslaw Curt Doolittle’s Law

    /propertarians Propertarians
    /curtdoolittleslaw Curt Doolittle’s Law


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-09 11:44:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1347871746809077762

    Reply addressees: @Gr0undControl88

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1347861386370674690

  • We have no more right to the appreciation or preservation of purchasing power of

    We have no more right to the appreciation or preservation of purchasing power of currency than any other perishable. 😉 To make that claim attempts to conflate saving or investing in assets with use of tokens for facilitating trade. Cash is perishable when not working as asset.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-01 17:11:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1345054979053203458