Theme: Property

I am not sure that libertarianism addresses the influence, persuasion, coercion,

I am not sure that libertarianism addresses the influence, persuasion, coercion, spectrum. They work from volition and property alone. But they don’t enumerate demonstrated interests other than those limited to the intersubjectively verifiable.
They’re trying to justify crime.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-02 00:50:09 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620947649150193667

Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @SevernDarden @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620937937142812672

February 2, 2023
I mean, I don’t think: “Productive, exhaustively Informed, warrantied, voluntary

I mean, I don’t think:
“Productive, exhaustively Informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, free of imposition of costs against the demonstrated interests of others by externality, and within the limits of restitutability” is open to circumvention. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-01 21:57:17 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620904144881045504

Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @SevernDarden @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620887658305310720

February 1, 2023
Just as marxism is prohibition on private property, and neoconservatism is prohi

Just as marxism is prohibition on private property, and neoconservatism is prohibition on public sovereignty, libertarianism is prohibition on common property to enable historical separatist ethics of free riding, privatizing commons, socializing gains, baiting into hazard.

Source date (UTC): 2023-02-01 19:12:36 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620862699805773824

Reply addressees: @SevernDarden @jamesfoxhiggins @TheAutistocrat @JohnGalt2727

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620856970151591936

February 1, 2023
(q) So, all ‘hazards’ are scams. Libertarianism is a scam to tolerate theft from

(q) So, all ‘hazards’ are scams. Libertarianism is a scam to tolerate theft from the commons, and prohibition on production of commons. Just like marxism is a prohibition on private property and the rewards there from. Lower class marxist, middle class libertarian, upper neocon.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-30 19:42:36 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620145471888162819

Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620136747349999616

January 30, 2023
(h) We do not have choice as to what demonstrated interests polities insure. (Yo

(h) We do not have choice as to what demonstrated interests polities insure. (You don’t get to choose what’s property and not). Property is determined by commonality (empirical evidence) of what people retaliate for impositions of costs upon.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-30 19:26:07 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620141324870770690

Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620136747349999616

January 30, 2023
(b) Humans bear costs to invest in, and demonstrate interests. (c) demonstrated

(b) Humans bear costs to invest in, and demonstrate interests.
(c) demonstrated interests are categorically capital:
– life and action.
– mates, offspring, kin, kith
– several interests
– contractual interests
– commons interests

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-30 19:18:13 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620139337857003520

Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620136747349999616

January 30, 2023
Hard to do in tweets, but: (a) Discovery, demonstrated interest, and possession

Hard to do in tweets, but:
(a) Discovery, demonstrated interest, and possession might be facts. Property exists only when demonstrated interests are insured by third parties, sufficient to prevent all but marginal harms or takings. This is fact. It’s not an opinion.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-30 19:13:45 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620138212495859713

Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins @JohnGalt2727

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620136747349999616

January 30, 2023
If you want me to science “porn, only fans, dating sites, hookup culture, common

If you want me to science “porn, only fans, dating sites, hookup culture, common property, and no fault divorce” I can, but it’s now obvious. Why? Same as marxism and libertarianism: these were both NAIVE and OPTIMISTIC false promises counter to the evidence of human behavior.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-30 16:31:44 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620097441499582464

Reply addressees: @jamesfoxhiggins

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1620059164637798401

January 30, 2023
Correct. FWIW: Ternary logic, instead of binary. 1. Obligations, 2. Rights, 3. I

Correct.

FWIW:
Ternary logic, instead of binary.
1. Obligations, 2. Rights, 3. Inalienations.
All three are required.

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-20 22:18:28 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616560820883804177

Reply addressees: @radiofreenw

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1616559619949879296

January 20, 2023
Baiting into hazard: Selling prostitution, gambling, alcohol on credit. 300% int

Baiting into hazard: Selling prostitution, gambling, alcohol on credit. 300% interest on agrarian loans otherwise unlendable. For the purpose of seizing assets at a discount.Slaving, Tax Collecting,and Alliance with the state against the people.
Do I really need to cover it here?

Source date (UTC): 2023-01-18 21:04:00 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615817305438527492

Reply addressees: @a325nuts @oteycoueye

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1615816576078422016

January 18, 2023