One need no political rights if one possesses property rights – unless one seeks to violate property rights. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:06:00 UTC
One need no political rights if one possesses property rights – unless one seeks to violate property rights. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 05:06:00 UTC
(When I feel a little better I will post a question and we’ll work through it. )
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
PRODUCT SAFETY
INTEREST
LIBEL AND SLANDER
BLACKMAIL
BRIBERY
MONOPOLY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
SELF DEFENSE
LIFEBOAT SCENARIOS
COLONIALISM (DIFFERENCES IN PROPERTY RIGHTS)
WAR, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC
ANIMALS
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES
RESOURCES THE LAND, AIR, AND SEA SPACE (EXTRA TERRESTRIAL)
RACE
EXCLUSION
IMMIGRATION
CONVERSION (RELIGIOUS, CULTURAL, LEGAL)
ABORTION
MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE
GENERATIONS
REPRODUCTION
DYSGENIA AND EUGENIA
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-17 02:22:00 UTC
Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-15 16:06:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/721006918500773889
Western Social Science: Natural Law: Acquisition, Property, Cooperation, Manners, Ethics, Morals, Liberty, Aristocracy. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-15 12:07:00 UTC
http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/frequently-asked-questions/ORIGINS OF PROPERTARIANISM
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-13 01:58:00 UTC
NOTE: when I use the term Monarchy, I use it in the narrow sense as a property holder of territory and formal institutions, where the monarch provides the ultimate veto power over contracts for commons, and the judiciary ultimate veto power over natural law.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-12 12:18:00 UTC
THE NASH OPTIMUM VS THE PARETO OPTIMUM
Nash:The best EXCHANGE possible, vs Pareto: the most THEFT Possible.
Economics in a nutshell. Austrians use Nash, Mainstream uses Pareto.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-09 06:53:00 UTC
I’d have to be sure that an such rent was in fact public.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 20:37:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718175827821727744
Reply addressees: @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718172966089928704
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718172966089928704
Propertianism: I’m not a debater. I’m a prosecutor. I want to know why you’re trying to engage in theft. And I will figure it out. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 09:02:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718000925923782656
So now that we know you are trying to preserve justification for moral and immoral to yourself, how do you want to steal?
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-07 08:58:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/718000106004471808
Reply addressees: @mdavilamartinez
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717996291104477184
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/717996291104477184