Theme: Property

  • I know your motive. I’m trying to expose your theft and dishonestly (fraud) as a

    I know your motive. I’m trying to expose your theft and dishonestly (fraud) as any good prosecutor would.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-20 00:47:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954515577002971136

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @hysellaz @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954513886656409600

  • What Are You?

    —“Are you Christian?”— I am a Sovereign, an Aryan, a Pagan, an Aristotelian, a Stoic, and a Christian. As a Sovereign: I limitlessly insure with my mind, body, kin, and property, the mind, body, kin, and property, of those who exchange the same with me. As an Aryan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of man into the gods we imagine – whether that be by cooperative voluntary production or uncooperative, and if necessary, violent prosecution. As a Pagan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of nature into the paradise we imagine. As an Aristotelian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of knowledge into the infinite dominion over emotion, mind, body, man, nature, and the universe. As a Stoic: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of the self such that we can make use of knowledge, nature, and mankind in transcendence of each: the continuous production of agency over self, others, and nature. As a Christian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of others lacking the agency of the Sovereign, Aryan, Pagan, Aristotelian, and Stoic. This is an aesthetic, a religion, philosophy, a law, and a science, of action. “My Name Is Aryan, And We Are Many” That what I am. === And there is no portfolio by by which one can act in concert with the universe than that. If there was I would have found it and chosen it instead.
  • What Are You?

    —“Are you Christian?”— I am a Sovereign, an Aryan, a Pagan, an Aristotelian, a Stoic, and a Christian. As a Sovereign: I limitlessly insure with my mind, body, kin, and property, the mind, body, kin, and property, of those who exchange the same with me. As an Aryan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of man into the gods we imagine – whether that be by cooperative voluntary production or uncooperative, and if necessary, violent prosecution. As a Pagan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of nature into the paradise we imagine. As an Aristotelian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of knowledge into the infinite dominion over emotion, mind, body, man, nature, and the universe. As a Stoic: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of the self such that we can make use of knowledge, nature, and mankind in transcendence of each: the continuous production of agency over self, others, and nature. As a Christian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of others lacking the agency of the Sovereign, Aryan, Pagan, Aristotelian, and Stoic. This is an aesthetic, a religion, philosophy, a law, and a science, of action. “My Name Is Aryan, And We Are Many” That what I am. === And there is no portfolio by by which one can act in concert with the universe than that. If there was I would have found it and chosen it instead.
  • WHAT ARE YOU? —“Are you Christian?”— I am a Sovereign, an Aryan, a Pagan, an

    WHAT ARE YOU?

    —“Are you Christian?”—

    I am a Sovereign, an Aryan, a Pagan, an Aristotelian, a Stoic, and a Christian.

    As a Sovereign: I limitlessly insure with my mind, body, kin, and property, the mind, body, kin, and property, of those who exchange the same with me.

    As an Aryan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of man into the gods we imagine – whether that be by cooperative voluntary production or uncooperative, and if necessary, violent prosecution.

    As a Pagan: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of nature into the paradise we imagine.

    As an Aristotelian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of knowledge into the infinite dominion over emotion, mind, body, man, nature, and the universe.

    As a Stoic: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of the self such that we can make use of knowledge, nature, and mankind in transcendence of each: the continuous production of agency over self, others, and nature.

    As a Christian: I take personal responsibility for the transcendence of others lacking the agency of the Sovereign, Aryan, Pagan, Aristotelian, and Stoic.

    This is an aesthetic, a religion, philosophy, a law, and a science, of action.

    “My Name Is Aryan, And We Are Many”

    That what I am.

    ===

    And there is no portfolio by by which one can act in concert with the universe than that. If there was I would have found it and chosen it instead.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 12:03:00 UTC

  • Just love everyone and prevent deception, fraud, and theft by every possible mea

    Just love everyone and prevent deception, fraud, and theft by every possible means. You’ll end up with small nation states where we have a whole lot of people ‘at the social top’ and almost no one world wide at the social bottoom.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-16 10:55:00 UTC

  • The Norwegians have the highest standard of living for the same reason the Saudi

    The Norwegians have the highest standard of living for the same reason the Saudi Family has gold plated toilet fixtures, and Russia is other than a third world country: because it has vast oil reserves and a very small population with low reproduction rates. Oil pays for it.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-13 20:35:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/952278056177164289

    Reply addressees: @Liz_Prato

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/951653826628542464


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/951653826628542464

  • From Twitter. Kyle Henry Sees A Pattern In History

    —“A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.”—@KyleHen44723716 1) Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now. 2) So I view my work as completing the enlightenment, and trying to provide the next empirical revolution – in psychology, social science, law, economics, and science – to compensate for the errors-wishful-thinking-deceit of the French, German, and Jewish counter-enlightenments. 3) The problem, and the one that creates the permanent vulnerability to any system of calculation, truth, sovereignty, and reciprocity, is that people all desire false histories. My only correct critics so far are those that say ‘truth is enough to rule, but not enough for man’.
  • From Twitter. Kyle Henry Sees A Pattern In History

    —“A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.”—@KyleHen44723716 1) Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now. 2) So I view my work as completing the enlightenment, and trying to provide the next empirical revolution – in psychology, social science, law, economics, and science – to compensate for the errors-wishful-thinking-deceit of the French, German, and Jewish counter-enlightenments. 3) The problem, and the one that creates the permanent vulnerability to any system of calculation, truth, sovereignty, and reciprocity, is that people all desire false histories. My only correct critics so far are those that say ‘truth is enough to rule, but not enough for man’.
  • FROM TWITTER. KYLE HENRY SEES A PATTERN IN HISTORY —“A little abstract,but whe

    FROM TWITTER. KYLE HENRY SEES A PATTERN IN HISTORY

    —“A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.”—@KyleHen44723716

    1) Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now.

    2) So I view my work as completing the enlightenment, and trying to provide the next empirical revolution – in psychology, social science, law, economics, and science – to compensate for the errors-wishful-thinking-deceit of the French, German, and Jewish counter-enlightenments.

    3) The problem, and the one that creates the permanent vulnerability to any system of calculation, truth, sovereignty, and reciprocity, is that people all desire false histories. My only correct critics so far are those that say ‘truth is enough to rule, but not enough for man’.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 13:21:00 UTC

  • Were There White Slaves In The Us?

    Indentured servitude is/was a contractual form of voluntary slavery, with exit , and indentured servants were a substantial part of the early colonies.

    The sex-slave trade in white women was common, and was only finally outlawed in 1910.

    THE ECONOMY SHIFTS, THE CONDITIONS REMAIN
    All of these forms of slavery were extant from the earliest records in almost every agrarian civilization.

    Take your pick:

    SERIES: Undomesticated Human Animal > Chattel Slavery(Property) > Slavery(servitude) > Serfdom (partial independence) > Economic Slavery(Wage Labor) > Tax Slavery (Citizen)> Jurisdictional Slavery(Government) > “Cult” slavery(Religion).

    Serfdom = Inability to exit taxation. Slavery=inability to exit, period.

    HIGH MINDEDNESS
    We take credit for high mindedness, but the truth of the matter is, that slavery occurs out of economic necessity, and the reason it disappeared was the black plague, the early modern agrarian revolution, the early industrial revolution, and late industrial revolutions, that made it economically preferential to have employees and customers rather than slaves.

    Rule of historical analysis: never assume people do things out of good nature. They do things because it’s feasible and they want to obtain virtue signals as means of displaying conspicuous consumption.

    The human intuitionistic and biological accounting system is just status signals.

    (Read Veblen)

    https://www.quora.com/Were-there-white-slaves-in-the-US