Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • The problem with “Human Rights” is in the determination of who in fact is ‘human

    The problem with “Human Rights” is in the determination of who in fact is ‘human’, and who remains some degree of domesticated animal. (humor)

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: All human rights are just property rights. That is all

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: All human rights are just property rights. That is all that they can be. Why we should not force property rights upon people is very hard to imagine. Of course, the communists would say that their last few articles that were forced into the international declaration in o…

  • Curt Doolittle’s answer: All human rights are just property rights. That is all

    Curt Doolittle’s answer: All human rights are just property rights. That is all that they can be. Why we should not force property rights upon people is very hard to imagine. Of course, the communists would say that their last few articles that were forced into the international declaration in o…

  • What Would You Consider As Basic Human Rights That Should Be Enforced On Everyone Without Exception?

    All human rights are just property rights. That is all that they can be. Why we should not force property rights upon people is very hard to imagine.

    Of course, the communists would say that their last few articles that were forced into the international declaration in order to get their signatures were also property rights , bt they cannot be, since they are demands for imposition on the property others, not demands that we forgo impositions upon the property of others.

    I’ve written extensively about this subject and there can exist no positive moral laws. All moral laws are prohibitions and prohibitions only. That is all it is possible for universal laws to be.

    https://www.quora.com/What-would-you-consider-as-basic-human-rights-that-should-be-enforced-on-everyone-without-exception

  • What Would You Consider As Basic Human Rights That Should Be Enforced On Everyone Without Exception?

    All human rights are just property rights. That is all that they can be. Why we should not force property rights upon people is very hard to imagine.

    Of course, the communists would say that their last few articles that were forced into the international declaration in order to get their signatures were also property rights , bt they cannot be, since they are demands for imposition on the property others, not demands that we forgo impositions upon the property of others.

    I’ve written extensively about this subject and there can exist no positive moral laws. All moral laws are prohibitions and prohibitions only. That is all it is possible for universal laws to be.

    https://www.quora.com/What-would-you-consider-as-basic-human-rights-that-should-be-enforced-on-everyone-without-exception

  • Is It Possible To Imagine A Pure Economic Action Independent Of Politics?

    Well, Zachary Taylor is largely correct:

    Undoubtedly you will get answers explaining how property rights and other institutions are themselves political arrangements, and therefore all economics is in fact political.

    The reasons being:

    • Military refers to an organization for the purpose of the creation of a monopoly commons – by denying alternative organizers and organizations of commons.
    • Politics refers to Cooperation for the Purpose of Producing and maintaining Commons.
    • Economics refers to the study of cooperation at all scales, the same way that Tort(Law Proper, not Command, Legislation, and Regulation) refers to the study of cooperation for the purpose of conflict resolution at all scales – by suppressing murder, harm, theft, fraud, free riding, conspiracy within the commons.
    • Informal Institutions refers to the study of institutions of cooperation and in particular intergeneration transmission of cooperation using the (expensive) commons that exist.

    I find it is most useful to teach people to think in series like this so that they understand how everything we do ties together into how to organize populations.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-to-imagine-a-pure-economic-action-independent-of-politics

  • Is It Possible To Imagine A Pure Economic Action Independent Of Politics?

    Well, Zachary Taylor is largely correct:

    Undoubtedly you will get answers explaining how property rights and other institutions are themselves political arrangements, and therefore all economics is in fact political.

    The reasons being:

    • Military refers to an organization for the purpose of the creation of a monopoly commons – by denying alternative organizers and organizations of commons.
    • Politics refers to Cooperation for the Purpose of Producing and maintaining Commons.
    • Economics refers to the study of cooperation at all scales, the same way that Tort(Law Proper, not Command, Legislation, and Regulation) refers to the study of cooperation for the purpose of conflict resolution at all scales – by suppressing murder, harm, theft, fraud, free riding, conspiracy within the commons.
    • Informal Institutions refers to the study of institutions of cooperation and in particular intergeneration transmission of cooperation using the (expensive) commons that exist.

    I find it is most useful to teach people to think in series like this so that they understand how everything we do ties together into how to organize populations.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-to-imagine-a-pure-economic-action-independent-of-politics

  • Why Do White Australians Own Australia?

    Ownership always and everywhere is determined by those who possess the capacity of violence sufficient to make such determination. Adults make economic statements. Children make moral statements. Children make moral statements because they lack the knowledge and resources to make economic statements. And that is what separates adults, infantilized non-adults, and children.

  • WHY DO WHITE AUSTRALIANS OWN AUSTRALIA? Ownership always and everywhere is deter

    WHY DO WHITE AUSTRALIANS OWN AUSTRALIA?

    Ownership always and everywhere is determined by those who possess the capacity of violence sufficient to make such determination.

    Adults make economic statements. Children make moral statements. Children make moral statements because they lack the knowledge and resources to make economic statements.

    And that is what separates adults, infantilized non-adults, and children.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-01 13:13:00 UTC

  • Why Do White Australians Own Australia?

    Ownership always and everywhere is determined by those who possess the capacity of violence sufficient to make such determination. Adults make economic statements. Children make moral statements. Children make moral statements because they lack the knowledge and resources to make economic statements. And that is what separates adults, infantilized non-adults, and children.