RT @ThruTheHayes: COMMON(S)ISM NOT COMMUNISM
Commonists not communists.
Common men not communal property.
Commonists preserve commons by…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 13:52:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703769017830232074
RT @ThruTheHayes: COMMON(S)ISM NOT COMMUNISM
Commonists not communists.
Common men not communal property.
Commonists preserve commons by…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 13:52:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703769017830232074
RT @StevePender: @LaurenWitzkeDE Then the police only serve to prevent business owners from protecting their property, in which case they’r…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-16 05:56:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702924435957731758
(interesting)
—“Value neutral means accounting from a point of zero cost/investment of value (property). We ought to coin the term “Zero Principles” in place of “First Principles” as these inception points of law represent as close to zero value assessments of human actions…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 05:23:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702553596930224421
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Those unfamiliar with the concept may observe discussion and assertion of irresiprocity and crime, value laden concepts,…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-15 05:19:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1702552798313828798
Do billionaires possess the value of wealth attributed to them?. Or do they influence where its put to work just like you and i paying for something and influencing it by doing so?
Is it liquid? And what would happen if we tried to liquidate it, and redistribute it to those 4 billion people?
If I have 100 billion in asset value, how much do i have in liquidated value, and consequently, how much will each of those 4 billion people receive? $25. Twenty five dollars. No effect.
And what will happen to those people using the 100Billion today across economies and industries? Profound effect.
Concentration of capital in investments, just as military concentration of force, political concentration of taxes, concentration of people in a city, concentration of knowledge in research, concentration of capital in a business, concentration of capital in a family making the home more affordable for both – all have greater positive effects than distributing it.
People with billions dont have billions on hand. In fact most of them have almost nothing on hand, and use credit lines and live off interest and debt, just so the money keeps working.
I am anything but an idiot. I am one of the few non idiots that will invest in you by even responding to you. And i do it out of civic duty.
Reply addressees: @marksmi86673362 @SenWarren
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-13 01:04:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701763783507456003
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1701753261642985487
This is correct. It’s also why the government refuses to publish per-citizen profit and loss, and per group balance sheets.
Theft is possible only by obscurity of the truth.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 16:07:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699816734662733894
Reply addressees: @zarathustra5150 @VDAREJamesK
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699798695410303312
RT @Plinz: @mfey619 The purpose of copyright law is not credit assignment (which is why copyright expires), but to ensure the economic cond…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 02:20:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699246118239117423
RT @Plinz: We must ensure that Copyright law does not prevent artificially intelligent agents from performing perception, learning, inferen…
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 02:18:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699245780975112691
No, Anti-SLAPP laws are meant to prevent people from interfering with freedom of speech. Filing a lawsuit for conspiracy to destroy the value of a business by coercion of (threat to) its customers, in order to impose limits on freedom of speech is a rather simple argument. You do not realize that you are projecting your morals as law where such a law does not exist.
Maybe you should leave grownup conversation to grownups.
Here is the dummy version:
–“Hate speech in the United States cannot be directly regulated by the government due to the fundamental right to freedom of speech protected by the Constitution. While “hate speech” is not a legal term in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that most of what would qualify as hate speech in other western countries is legally protected speech under the First Amendment. In a Supreme Court case on the issue, Matal v. Tam (2017), the justices unanimously reaffirmed that there is effectively no “hate speech” exception to the free speech rights protected by the First Amendment and that the U.S. government may not discriminate against speech on the basis of the speaker’s viewpoint.”–
Reply addressees: @LexerD1986 @lauferlaw @elonmusk @alx
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 04:23:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698914642095976448
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698913062319772074
Exasperated.
I have a job that is profoundly moral in ambition, and that is to restore those parts of the natural and common law that were practiced but insufficiently codified, such that we may preserve participatory government, rule of law, our freedom and sovereignty, and the benefits thereof, for ourselves and posterity, by limiting us to truthful, reciprocal debate in pursuit of decisions by concurrency (agreement across classes, factions, and regions). Some people don’t want the truth or reciprocity as that leads to meritocracy. But that’s ok. Those are the bad people that threaten us all.
I expose the falsehoods, deceits, crimes, and evils of every group whether sex, class, faction, culture, civilization, or even race. That includes my own. So don’t accuse me of favoritism or bias when that is just a deception on your part. We are in a period where we have the greatest opportunity Not to compromise with others, and pursue our faction’s interest without regard to others. This is particularly true of those groups most recently enfranchised that are instinctually or culturally biased to the feminine intuition, yet our history of laws and traditions has not kept pace with feminine antisocial, anti-political, or anti-economic behavior. This is because the rise of the west, in three ages, faster than the rest combined is due to western civ’s demand for maximum personal responsibility for capitalization of both private and common, which is counter to the feminine instinct for hyperconsumption without responsibility for other than her offspring.
We will get thru this crisis if for no other reason than those who fail will exit the gene pool faster than they are doing so already. But let’s hope it doesn’t take another dark age to do it.
Y job is to facilitate that restoration of cooperation. That’s what epistemologists, scientists, and judges do.
You can reared disagree with me on these matters without confessing to your immorality and criminality.
Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 01:50:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698876278516924416