Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • Do Natural Rights Exist? No. but We Can Create Them

    1 – There exists a natural law (necessity), and that is non-imposition (reciprocity, sovereignty). We do not have a choice in this. It is the product of physical universe, and the necessity of a species capable of the pursuit of self interest as well as cooperation in that self interest. 2 – That necessity of natural law can be expressed positively (usefully) as a collection of rights of appeal to a court (insurer) of natural law (reciprocity, sovereignty). 3 – In that sense, we can attempt to violate natural law, or we can attempt to construct natural rights (defenses of reciprocity). While courts of the common (natural) law of tort attempt to construct natural rights under rule of law, the state attempts (constantly) to violate that natural law by the construction of legislation that violates the natural law of reciprocity. 4 – Natural rights do not exist, but instead, natural rights (specific insurances of sovereignty) are something we can seek to create through legislation (contract), that is then enforced by the courts (insurer). 5 – Natural Rights are not something that exists without our creation of them under the natural law of non-imposition, reciprocity, sovereignty. The are merely something we desire to produce within the natural law of reciprocity, as specific guarantees of those instances of property: life, liberty, property, and interests in the multitude of physical, normative, traditional, and institutional commons.

  • There are only two social sciences: the law of tort (property), and its facility

    —There are only two social sciences: the law of tort (property), and its facility and measurement: economics. The problem is macro economics seeks to circumvent the law, and the law is ignorant of macro economics.—

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 11:55:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1023537581953306625

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —There are only two social sciences: the la

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —There are only two social sciences: the law of tort (property), and its facility and measurement: economics. The problem is macro economics seeks to circumvent the law, and the law is ignorant of macro economics.—

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 11:55:42 UTC

  • There are only two social sciences: the law of tort (property), and its facility

    —There are only two social sciences: the law of tort (property), and its facility and measurement: economics. The problem is macro economics seeks to circumvent the law, and the law is ignorant of macro economics.—

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-29 07:55:00 UTC

  • Disinformation

    by Radu M Oleniuc So now I am a disinformation agent. I think those 150 bn (billion) dollars (Iran) do not belong to a terrorist state and were rightfully confiscated. Obama considered them as “seized”, and returned those to a terrorist state massively funding propaganda through various proxies (NGOs, newspapers, corrupt journalists and officials), yet I am spreading disinformation by calling this appeasement simply as it is: treason to our values and civilization by helping an adversary trying to destroy the west. Not only that we as the western world should have not gave “their money back”, we should have bombed their oil fields to pieces and send the bill for the rest. Because those 150 billions are just a small fraction of what we spend on our defense. Not fair? Well, the next time when an Iranian ideologue trains a bunch of suicidal zealots or wants to bribe a journalist using US dollars obtained from oil and gas, he would think twice, because he would know that his oil refinery will be leveled the next day. With his GSM tower antenna as well, because his ideology belongs to the Middle Ages when electricity was not yet invented. He could start planning his attacks with goats, but without any kind of help from mobile phones or GPS. Or SWIFT system, dollars or banks. He could use rupees, rials, renminbi or whatever he wants, but if he uses dollars, then he should know that there is always this risk. Vladimir Ilich Lenin tactic where ‘The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them” has to stop.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post. ARABIC TRANSLATION OF PROPERTARIAN CORE CONCEPTS B

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    ARABIC TRANSLATION OF PROPERTARIAN CORE CONCEPTS BY Eli Harman

    The Propertarian Philosophy: Core Concepts
    by Eli Harman
    Translated by Ahmed Reda
    Revised by Heydar Rashed

    Including an Introduction: “Property in toto”
    by Allen Freeman
    Translated by Heydar Rashed

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-25 17:14:14 UTC

  • ARABIC TRANSLATION OF PROPERTARIAN CORE CONCEPTS BY Eli Harman The Propertarian

    ARABIC TRANSLATION OF PROPERTARIAN CORE CONCEPTS BY Eli Harman

    The Propertarian Philosophy: Core Concepts

    by Eli Harman

    Translated by Ahmed Reda

    Revised by Heydar Rashed

    Including an Introduction: “Property in toto”

    by Allen Freeman

    Translated by Heydar Rashed

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-25 13:14:00 UTC

  • ARABIC TRANSLATION OF PROPERTARIAN CORE CONCEPTS BY @[11833594:2048:Eli Harman]

    ARABIC TRANSLATION OF PROPERTARIAN CORE CONCEPTS BY @[11833594:2048:Eli Harman]

    The Propertarian Philosophy: Core Concepts

    by @[11833594:2048:Eli Harman]

    Translated by @[100001249838669:2048:Ahmed Reda]

    Revised by @[100008788366413:2048:Heydar Rashed]

    Including an Introduction: “Property in toto”

    by Allen Freeman

    Translated by @[100008788366413:2048:Heydar Rashed]

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-25 13:14:00 UTC

  • Anarchism cannot survive

    Anarcho – *(Rothbard, Hoppe) = at best, discretionary poly-logical, market law. And therefore is limited to defense of intersubjectively verifiable property; since law can only form as such at the minimum tolerable scope of application. Just as the church majority parasites then, the state parasites, left parasites, and immigrant parasites, in group feminists, and in group libertines today and the abrahamists in all their forms, more people always want to preserve their means of cheating (parasitism) than want to suppress them – despite all evidence that the forgone parasitisms produce multiples of returns far beyond their individual abilities to produce such returns. This is why Anarchism cannot survive – because as the complexity of cooperation increases to produce higher returns, individuals and groups must exit in order to find insurers (governments) that permit the more productive, higher risk, means of production.

  • Anarchism cannot survive

    Anarcho – *(Rothbard, Hoppe) = at best, discretionary poly-logical, market law. And therefore is limited to defense of intersubjectively verifiable property; since law can only form as such at the minimum tolerable scope of application. Just as the church majority parasites then, the state parasites, left parasites, and immigrant parasites, in group feminists, and in group libertines today and the abrahamists in all their forms, more people always want to preserve their means of cheating (parasitism) than want to suppress them – despite all evidence that the forgone parasitisms produce multiples of returns far beyond their individual abilities to produce such returns. This is why Anarchism cannot survive – because as the complexity of cooperation increases to produce higher returns, individuals and groups must exit in order to find insurers (governments) that permit the more productive, higher risk, means of production.