Theme: Property

  • RT @Lord__Sousa: The right of families to accumulate and transfer wealth in all

    RT @Lord__Sousa: The right of families to accumulate and transfer wealth in all its forms between generations shall not be infringed.

    – @c…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-06 16:25:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721564377936003279

  • yep. But then the obligation of families not to use the concentration of wealth

    yep. But then the obligation of families not to use the concentration of wealth to undermine markets, concurrency, commonality, and due process under the natural law, and it’s constitution is implemented as well. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-11-06 16:23:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721564003653017843

    Reply addressees: @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721559773055778885

  • I was wondering if someone was gonna go there. Now (assuming you’ve watched my v

    I was wondering if someone was gonna go there.

    Now (assuming you’ve watched my video on Ancestral Lands), what do you do when the people who were the philistines integrate into the local culture and eventually disappear into it?

    1) Genetics
    2) History

    TLDR; the jews are an admixture of various regional ethnic arabs with some fragment of European Philistine component that I have a vague memory of being small.(I’m not willing to go search for it)

    In other words, The jews of the levant had a minor european component, and the ashkenazi are at least half eurpean if not more so.

    Genetic Studies:
    Ancient DNA: Recent advances in the field of ancient DNA (aDNA) have begun to shed light on the genetic makeup of the Philistines. For instance, a 2019 study that examined remains from a Philistine burial site in Ashkelon suggested that they did have a European ancestry, confirming theories about their Aegean origins. However, the study also showed that this genetic signature began to fade in subsequent generations, indicating intermarriage with local populations.

    Local Integration: Given the evidence of assimilation and intermarriage, it’s plausible that some genetic markers of the Philistines could be diffused into the broader population of the Levant. However, identifying these markers in modern populations would be a complex task given the multiple layers of migration and mixing that the region has witnessed.

    Genetic Admixture: The Levant has been a crossroads for various civilizations, leading to a complex genetic tapestry. Disentangling the specific contributions of the Philistines to this mix would be challenging.

    Philistine History
    The Philistines were a people of Aegean origin who settled on the southern coast of ancient Canaan, now modern-day Israel and the Gaza Strip, around the 12th century BCE. They are most famous for their conflicts with the Israelites, as recorded in the Hebrew Bible.

    Decline and Assimilation:
    Assyrian and Babylonian Invasions: During the 8th and 7th centuries BCE, the Assyrians exerted control over Philistine cities. Later, the Babylonians also invaded the region. These invasions led to a decline in Philistine political autonomy.

    Cultural Assimilation: Over time, the distinctiveness of the Philistine culture became increasingly diluted. They adopted local languages and customs, which suggests a level of assimilation into the surrounding cultures.

    Absorption into Neo-Babylonian and Persian Empires: After the fall of the Assyrian Empire, the Philistine cities were absorbed into the Neo-Babylonian Empire and later the Persian Empire.

    Hellenistic Influence: Following the conquests of Alexander the Great, the Levant, including the Philistine territories, came under heavy Hellenistic influence, further accelerating their cultural assimilation.

    Roman Rule: Eventually, the area came under Roman rule. By this time, the Philistines as a distinct people had largely disappeared, absorbed into the broader cultural and ethnic milieu.

    Religious Transformation: With the spread of monotheistic religions like Judaism and later Christianity and Islam, the polytheistic religious practices of the Philistines likely faded away.

    Reply addressees: @NWEurasian @Obediencio1


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 16:56:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717223526678077441

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717214476267593958

  • determining ownership

    determining ownership.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 12:13:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717152507468624287

    Reply addressees: @Claffertyshane

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1717145045193687435

  • PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture” (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v. (the generalizati

    PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture”
    (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v.
    (the generalization of homesteading)

    (re: contra kinsella 2)
    Kinsella uses the libertarian term “original appropriation” which says nothing other than an action that one seeks to bring a thing under his control and…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 01:36:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716992123457745222

  • PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture” (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v. (the generalizati

    PROPOSED TERM: “Primovestiture”
    (Pree’-moh-vess’-tih-tyoor) v.
    (the generalization of homesteading)

    (re: contra kinsella 2)
    Kinsella uses the libertarian term “original appropriation” which says nothing other than an action that one seeks to bring a thing under his control and out of the control of others”.

    We use the word homesteading which is more appropriate (sic) because it means you’ve invested in an thing over time that was not previously invested in by others.

    Homesteading is the better term – but this might be one of those rare time we need a neologism. 😉

    We need a term that is the equivalent of homesteading that more generalzed and consists of the operational terms by which we bring our control over something into legitimacy by the costs born without impacting the costs born by others. We need to be creative about defining a new term.

    Primovestiture: From “primo” (first) and “investment.”

    Elements of Primovestiture
    Initial Investment: The human action of allocating resources—whether it’s labor, capital, or intellectual effort—to something previously unclaimed or undeveloped.

    Exclusivity: Ensuring that the actor is the first to make the said investment, effectively nullifying the possibility of dual claims over the resource.

    Non-Deprivation: The investment does not produce externalities that would impose costs on others, maintaining a state of Pareto efficiency.

    Utility in Decidability
    Primovestiture offers a criterion for the decidability in disputes over initial claims by providing an axiomatic foundation based on natural law. If an action satisfies the principles of Primovestiture, then it has achieved a state of ethical legitimacy and should be universally preferable within a given legal system. It also dovetails with performative truth, as the action itself, when conducted under the constraints of Primovestiture, reveals a truth about the legitimacy of ownership.

    Cross-disciplinary Application
    Given your focus on unifying multiple fields under the banner of Natural Law, Primovestiture can serve as

    The concept fills a notable gap in the lexicon of property theory and resource allocation. It essentially entails a generalized form of “homesteading” that extends beyond land and natural resources to include anything that can be controlled or influenced by human action. The focus is on the ethical or legitimate acquisition through initial investment, without creating external costs for others.

    Steps to coining a new term:

    1. Identify Key Components of the Concept
    Initial Investment: You are the first to allocate resources—be it time, effort, or material goods.
    Exclusivity: No one else has previously invested in the object or concept.
    Non-Deprivation: Your investment does not deprive or cost others.

    2. Consult Existing Terminology
    Terms like “usufruct,” “first appropriation,” and “stakeholding” might provide inspiration but aren’t adequate to capture your concept entirely.

    3. Experiment with Word Creation
    Primovestiture: From “primo” (first) and “investment.”

    4. Assess the Term for Clarity and Applicability
    The term should be self-explanatory to some degree.
    It should be broad enough to apply to various contexts, from natural resources to intellectual property to social and economic capital.

    5. Introduce the Term in Academic and Professional Circles
    A white paper or academic article that outlines the theoretical framework can serve as an introduction.

    I don’t think much of academia but this might be one of those cases where it’s useful.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-25 01:36:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716992123151499264

  • MIGHT, RIGHT, AND RIGHTS (re: counter kinsella) Might does, always and everywher

    MIGHT, RIGHT, AND RIGHTS
    (re: counter kinsella)
    Might does, always and everywhere make RIGHTS – as in the right to appeal to an insurer for the enforcement of a contractual right, constitutional right, or natural right under natural law.
    Whether might makes right – as in right or wrong, moral or immoral – or not is a question of whether might is involved but whether the actions and consequences are right or wrong, moral or immoral.
    In this sense, might can make right or not, and is required to make rights, obligations, and inalienations: all of them.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 23:01:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716953200266293248

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of it.”– Paraphrase of Dr Brad.

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716172919561224192

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of it.”–

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159194401742848

  • Let me restate that in simple terms: –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff

    Let me restate that in simple terms:

    –“The more stuff you have, the more stuff you have to fight for, against more people who want your stuff, but won’t pay the material, behavioral, or knowledge costs of paying for it.”–

    Who has the most physical, behavioral, and knowledge stuff?
    Well? Who wants a ‘piece of it’ without paying the cost of integrating into the physical behavioral and knowledge costs of it?
    And even among those within it – who seeks to evade the physical, behavioral, and knowledge costs of paying for it?

    You know the answer.
    It’s not multiculturalism you see.
    It’s just looting and pillaging really.
    And its starting to look a lot more like r**ping, looting, pillaging of biological, physical, behavioral, and informational capital.

    How do we know? We can measure it. We have:
    We’re being raided by enemies conducting r**ping, looting, pillaging, and otherwise destroying our milennia of accumulated physcal, behavioral, and ifnormational capital.

    Just because someone wars against you slowly doesn’t mean they aren’t waring against you completely.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-22 19:21:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716159056908349440