Theme: Property

  • What evidence do you have that the state cannot end digital shares in digital ne

    What evidence do you have that the state cannot end digital shares in digital networks?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:30:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180822695988121600

    Reply addressees: @NickmhTw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180822192495321088


    IN REPLY TO:

    @nickTw7m47amfe

    @curtdoolittle The state needs to demonstrate that anything it economically touches isn’t poison. Untill that happens? Btc will be the standard by which all others will be measured.
    It can generate as much crypto as it likes. It will “suck-in” the naive. But that’s all.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180822192495321088

  • I don’t make mistakes. This isn’t one of them. I’ve been right since people firs

    I don’t make mistakes. This isn’t one of them. I’ve been right since people first started asking me to comment on it because the technology we call ‘money’ is a specialty of mine. That said, BTC is just off book R&D for the State who will release multiple currencies next crisis.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:23:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180820791551762432

    Reply addressees: @NickmhTw

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180819585638887424


    IN REPLY TO:

    @nickTw7m47amfe

    @curtdoolittle Btw? Nope! 😁
    While records of western economic’s continues to erode and reflect political and philosophical lies?…
    Bitcoin’s blockchain, and access to it, Bitcoin, will attract increasing numbers of “escapees”.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180819585638887424

  • Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common proper

    Libertarianism is just demand for a commune of private rather than common property at best, or an excuse to fool high trust european peoples into hosting parasitic peoples who specialize in profit from baiting into moral hazard, under the pretense of doing no harm.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:02:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180815686504980480

    Reply addressees: @psionin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180815262301540353


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @psionin If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180815262301540353


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @psionin If not, then the polity cannot survive competition in the market for territories, population and social, economic, and political order. Which is why there are no libertarian polities, and never will be.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180815262301540353

  • Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t unde

    Libertarianism is just common property marxism. So “For me” means you don’t understand that the only source of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom and Prosperity is rule of law, producing markets for everything, including *commons*, or what we call ‘government’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 11:55:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180813951891918849

    Reply addressees: @psionin

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180761365444792320


    IN REPLY TO:

    @psionin

    @curtdoolittle For me the last part best manifests itself within the ideas of libertarianism.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180761365444792320

  • PROPERTARIANISM IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT JUST LIKE ARISTOTELIANISM WHICH IT SEEKS

    PROPERTARIANISM IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT JUST LIKE ARISTOTELIANISM WHICH IT SEEKS TO COMPLETE

    Let’s disambiguate Propertarianism a bit.

    We use the term “Propertarianism” as a brand name…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=478069659456596&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 17:02:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180166287042977793

  • USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS The NAP? Really? 1. Define aggression,

    USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS

    The NAP?
    Really?

    1. Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=478058066124422&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 16:40:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180160793251328000

  • USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS The NAP? Really? 1. Define aggression,

    USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS

    The NAP?

    Really?

    1. Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes aggression against what?

    a) define aggression?

    b) against what?

    c) who determines it’s aggression and how?

    2. The litmus test is blackmail. Is blackmail aggression?

    3. What is the minimum scope of property necessary for a polity to survive competition for territory and people? How do you know that?

    4. What is the minimum scope of contributions to the production of commons (defense, common goods and services) sufficient for a polity to survive competition for territory, population, and political control? How do you know that?

    5. Why can’t I proactively defend myself on my terms rather than wait until an opposition individual, group, organization, or state conducts violence, harm, theft, fraud, socialization of losses, free riding, rent seeking, corruption, immigration, conversion, undermining, warfare, conquest?

    Once you realize you’re a useful idiot it will probably make you angry that you were a useful idiot and then you will go thru a period of hating the enemy for baiting you in to useful idiocy, but the fact remains – you are a useful idiot if you bought the NAP instead of rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity where property consists of demonstrated interests.

    You and your opinion don’t matter. The market determines all of these – not you.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 12:40:00 UTC

  • Yes, but then, if you don’t have property, commercial achievement, military serv

    Yes, but then, if you don’t have property, commercial achievement, military service, and gender requirements for MPs you’re gonna get exactly what you get by random selection.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 04:36:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179978541708001280

    Reply addressees: @VirtutemPopulo_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179706619246063617


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179706619246063617

  • Everyone But Us

    EVERYONE BUT US by @BlackSheepBrouhaha

    —“Curt Doolittle is doing better work than Libertarians or Nazis making a coherent ideology which takes this into account. Property is something you defend with your life. If you share that responsibility with others, that’s common property. If you share it with everyone, that’s a nation. It is the frontier which people defend from outsiders. We’ve lost the militia instinct. We own nothing we wouldn’t fight for. We fight for nothing, we own nothing. We surrendered sovereignty to the state and the state betrayed us. Our countrymen betrayed us when they abdicated their duty to defense. Freedom to some means socialization of the common property. They’ve given away what they swore to defend in exchange for tacos and Medicare. It’s like the natives who sold America for a measly price. Violence is an imposed price. A price floor. You cannot sell out this country without paying the cost yourself. You’ve got to buy us out and our price is the blood of bond you swore to defend our nation. That’s what a nation means. That’s what a family means. That’s what a race means. That’s life, and its what every other race is doing but whites.”—

  • Everyone But Us

    EVERYONE BUT US by @BlackSheepBrouhaha

    —“Curt Doolittle is doing better work than Libertarians or Nazis making a coherent ideology which takes this into account. Property is something you defend with your life. If you share that responsibility with others, that’s common property. If you share it with everyone, that’s a nation. It is the frontier which people defend from outsiders. We’ve lost the militia instinct. We own nothing we wouldn’t fight for. We fight for nothing, we own nothing. We surrendered sovereignty to the state and the state betrayed us. Our countrymen betrayed us when they abdicated their duty to defense. Freedom to some means socialization of the common property. They’ve given away what they swore to defend in exchange for tacos and Medicare. It’s like the natives who sold America for a measly price. Violence is an imposed price. A price floor. You cannot sell out this country without paying the cost yourself. You’ve got to buy us out and our price is the blood of bond you swore to defend our nation. That’s what a nation means. That’s what a family means. That’s what a race means. That’s life, and its what every other race is doing but whites.”—