Theme: Property

  • What is the difference between lending at interest and usury?

    What is the difference between lending at interest and usury?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 19:33:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253769091711733761

    Reply addressees: @judicialist @ComicDaveSmith

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253763499085434880

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: Reciprocity, property in toto, compatibilism, and tri-function

    RT @ThruTheHayes: Reciprocity, property in toto, compatibilism, and tri-functionalism; these continue reciprocity at increasing scales.
    -@c…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 17:18:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253735026145013760

  • RT @ThruTheHayes: Harsh Truth of the Militia: He who can defend a thing, owns a

    RT @ThruTheHayes: Harsh Truth of the Militia:
    He who can defend a thing, owns a thing.
    He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing.
    -@curt…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 17:17:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253734946528800768

  • What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Pro

    What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Propertarian strict construction https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/24/what-are-some-key-traits-and-talents-of-ashkenazi-jews-who-can-specialize-in-propertarian-strict-construction/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 13:38:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253679622375583747

  • What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Propertarian strict construction?

    RE: The Choice Episode 0005 – Our Civilization’s Next Great Enterprise Thank you for sharing. One question: What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can actually specialize in Propertarian strict construction while in public?(130+ IQs, cognitive masculinity, < 35-yrs-old, maleness, >$60k/yr., etc.?)

    [T]here are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy. The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively feminine in each influence: Genetics, Religion, Tradition, and Culture. (German jews had almost fully integrated pre-war, such that “presbyterians and jews were indistinguishable.”) Evidence says genetic. If it’s genetic then as I’ve suggested our laws must evolve to protect against cognitively female anti-social and social-criminal behavior (Undermining, Seduction,False promise, Baiting into Hazard, Magical Thinking). But it is difficult to imagine females or Ashkenazim changing. But it’s certainly possible. And if we change law and education so that people are as aware of criminality, including female anti-social and interpersonal and social criminality, then we should be able (over time) to suppress it as we have suppressed other anti-social behavior.

    I have an interminable hunch that cognitively masculine Ashkenazis are disproportionately under-supported, whereas cognitively feminine Ashkenazis are disproportionately astro-turfed. Not sure whether to introduce this idea ONLY to S.T.E.M.-specialist Jews.

    Of course. I won’t name names, but I have a close friend who is important in our movement that pays a high price for it with family and fellows. Again, I’ll point out that integrated and loyal A’s are exceptional, and as a high iq/verbal acuity individual I have more socially in common than most of my own. It’s politics that differ. And yes, I am sure you’re right. it’s the activist feminine mind that’s the problem. unfinished

    Creating at least 1 syllabus (featuring no combative language) through which >130IQ Ashkenazis can master Propertarianism can inexpensively help Jews begin to realize that your vision can conditionally upgrade Jews’ immediate & long-term safety, prosperity.

    1) Excellent idea. I’ve written extensively but audio will work as well. Will do. 2) Why did you link Youtube in this tweet?

  • What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can specialize in Propertarian strict construction?

    RE: The Choice Episode 0005 – Our Civilization’s Next Great Enterprise Thank you for sharing. One question: What are some key traits and talents of Ashkenazi Jews who can actually specialize in Propertarian strict construction while in public?(130+ IQs, cognitive masculinity, < 35-yrs-old, maleness, >$60k/yr., etc.?)

    [T]here are good people and bad people in every group. It’s just IQ, Cognitive Masculinity: eschewing attention, priority for system(group) rather than empathy(individual), solving for Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth before Preference or Face, and Purity, Loyalty, and Hierarchy. The question is, whether the degree to which the Ashkenazim are cognitively feminine in each influence: Genetics, Religion, Tradition, and Culture. (German jews had almost fully integrated pre-war, such that “presbyterians and jews were indistinguishable.”) Evidence says genetic. If it’s genetic then as I’ve suggested our laws must evolve to protect against cognitively female anti-social and social-criminal behavior (Undermining, Seduction,False promise, Baiting into Hazard, Magical Thinking). But it is difficult to imagine females or Ashkenazim changing. But it’s certainly possible. And if we change law and education so that people are as aware of criminality, including female anti-social and interpersonal and social criminality, then we should be able (over time) to suppress it as we have suppressed other anti-social behavior.

    I have an interminable hunch that cognitively masculine Ashkenazis are disproportionately under-supported, whereas cognitively feminine Ashkenazis are disproportionately astro-turfed. Not sure whether to introduce this idea ONLY to S.T.E.M.-specialist Jews.

    Of course. I won’t name names, but I have a close friend who is important in our movement that pays a high price for it with family and fellows. Again, I’ll point out that integrated and loyal A’s are exceptional, and as a high iq/verbal acuity individual I have more socially in common than most of my own. It’s politics that differ. And yes, I am sure you’re right. it’s the activist feminine mind that’s the problem. unfinished

    Creating at least 1 syllabus (featuring no combative language) through which >130IQ Ashkenazis can master Propertarianism can inexpensively help Jews begin to realize that your vision can conditionally upgrade Jews’ immediate & long-term safety, prosperity.

    1) Excellent idea. I’ve written extensively but audio will work as well. Will do. 2) Why did you link Youtube in this tweet?

  • Math Versus Natural Law — the Same?

    [M]ath is a logic of positional naming, and Natural law a logic of Property Naming. The grammar of both Math and Law consists of operations on names. So in math we use operations to maintain balance (equilibrium) on both sides of an equal’s sign, and in natural law we use operations to maintain balance between individuals. See? Here: Human Logical Facility (constant relations) > …. Human Language Facility (sequence of sounds) > …. …. Human Grammar Facility (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) > …. …. …. Grammars (deflationary <- ordinary -> inflationary) > …. …. …. …. Math (positional names) > …. …. …. …. …. Programming (procedural names) > …. …. …. …. …. …. Natural Law (human actions) > …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Ordinary Language (utility) > …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Opining (Loading, Framing) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Fictions (adding what’s not there) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Fictionalisms (sophistry pseudoscience, supernaturalism) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Deceit (lying) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Denial …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Silence (Notice: Note how I left out verbal logic, rationalism, and philosophy because they’re included in sophistry.)

  • Math Versus Natural Law — the Same?

    [M]ath is a logic of positional naming, and Natural law a logic of Property Naming. The grammar of both Math and Law consists of operations on names. So in math we use operations to maintain balance (equilibrium) on both sides of an equal’s sign, and in natural law we use operations to maintain balance between individuals. See? Here: Human Logical Facility (constant relations) > …. Human Language Facility (sequence of sounds) > …. …. Human Grammar Facility (rules of continuous recursive disambiguation) > …. …. …. Grammars (deflationary <- ordinary -> inflationary) > …. …. …. …. Math (positional names) > …. …. …. …. …. Programming (procedural names) > …. …. …. …. …. …. Natural Law (human actions) > …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Ordinary Language (utility) > …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Opining (Loading, Framing) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Fictions (adding what’s not there) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Fictionalisms (sophistry pseudoscience, supernaturalism) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Deceit (lying) …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Denial …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. …. Silence (Notice: Note how I left out verbal logic, rationalism, and philosophy because they’re included in sophistry.)

  • Moral Foundations (instincts)

    (HERD): SOCIALIST – EQUALITARIAN – FEMALE(Consumption – Short Term – Anti-Property)Offer: Care, Affection, Sex. Weapon: Undermining, Disloyalty.

    1) Care/Harm: Redistributive Property (Welfare, Charity, Land reform)

    And; 2) Fairness/Cheating: Proportionality. Cooperative Property (Sharing, Antitrust laws, Sport rules)(SOLITARY HUNTER): LIBERTARIAN – EGALITARIAN – ASCENDENT MALE(Production – Medium Term – Property – Exchange)Offer: Exchange. Weapon: Boycott (deprivation)

    3) Liberty/Oppression: Personal Property (freedom, liberty, self determination, opportunity seeking)

    And; 4) Truth/Face: reciprocity information Property (truth before face:M vs face before truth:F)(PACK) ARISTOCRACY – HIERARCHY – DOMINANT MALE(Capitalization – Long Term – Common Property) Offer: Defense, Safety, Order. Weapon: Force, Violence, Disorder.

    5) Sanctity/Degradation: Disgust: Normative Property (Norms, Manners, Ethics)

    And; 6) Loyalty/Betrayal: Interpersonal Property (Kinship, Ethnicity, Nationhood)

    And; 7) Authority/Subversion: Institutional Property (Religion, Hierarchy, Law)

  • Moral Foundations (instincts)

    (HERD): SOCIALIST – EQUALITARIAN – FEMALE(Consumption – Short Term – Anti-Property)Offer: Care, Affection, Sex. Weapon: Undermining, Disloyalty.

    1) Care/Harm: Redistributive Property (Welfare, Charity, Land reform)

    And; 2) Fairness/Cheating: Proportionality. Cooperative Property (Sharing, Antitrust laws, Sport rules)(SOLITARY HUNTER): LIBERTARIAN – EGALITARIAN – ASCENDENT MALE(Production – Medium Term – Property – Exchange)Offer: Exchange. Weapon: Boycott (deprivation)

    3) Liberty/Oppression: Personal Property (freedom, liberty, self determination, opportunity seeking)

    And; 4) Truth/Face: reciprocity information Property (truth before face:M vs face before truth:F)(PACK) ARISTOCRACY – HIERARCHY – DOMINANT MALE(Capitalization – Long Term – Common Property) Offer: Defense, Safety, Order. Weapon: Force, Violence, Disorder.

    5) Sanctity/Degradation: Disgust: Normative Property (Norms, Manners, Ethics)

    And; 6) Loyalty/Betrayal: Interpersonal Property (Kinship, Ethnicity, Nationhood)

    And; 7) Authority/Subversion: Institutional Property (Religion, Hierarchy, Law)