Theme: Productivity

  • WE TRIED TO MAKE THE WORLD GET ALONG – SMITHIAN FREE TRADE. We failed at technol

    WE TRIED TO MAKE THE WORLD GET ALONG – SMITHIAN FREE TRADE.
    We failed at technological redistribution. We failed at free trade redistributing economic prosperity. We failed at encouraging self-rule and self-determination by self-government and rule of law. We failed at colonization. We have only succeeded at ‘replacement’ and we have decided that we don’t want to do that again.
    NO “ONE SIZE” OF GOVERNMENT FITS ALL

    We created free trade and ended the possibility of empires. There are empires that want the privilege of empires instead of the merit of free trade. And there are countries that are incompetent enough that they need empires and monopoly trade routes to survive.

    Peoples of the world are vastly different, especially in average intelligence, and as such in average norms, traditions, values, institutions, and resulting economies and standards of living.

    The way we ‘get along’ is to return to the ‘conflict of civilizations’ which is now the conflict of federations of advanced civilizations against the empires of failed imperial civilizations.

    Civilizations must satisfy the genetics and consequences of genetics, of the people who are born into them. And that means while natural law is a universal good, the means of bringing about anything close to that human condition requires a spectrum of governments from authoritarian to libertarian.

    There is only one truth. There is only one set of laws of nature. There is only one natural law. There is only one means of rule of law by the natural law. But as for governments that organize cooperation, reproduction, production, distribution and trade, No one size fits all.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @MudKevin @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 18:19:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638968609018900480

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638964425574215681

  • WE TRIED TO MAKE THE WORLD GET ALONG – SMITHIAN FREE TRADE. We failed at technol

    WE TRIED TO MAKE THE WORLD GET ALONG – SMITHIAN FREE TRADE.
    We failed at technological redistribution. We failed at free trade redistributing economic prosperity. We failed at encouraging self-rule and self-determination by self-government and rule of law. We failed at colonization. We have only succeeded at ‘replacement’ and we have decided that we don’t want to do that again.
    NO “ONE SIZE” OF GOVERNMENT FITS ALL

    We created free trade and ended the possibility of empires. There are empires that want the privilege of empires instead of the merit of free trade. And there are countries that are incompetent enough that they need empires and monopoly trade routes to survive.

    Peoples of the world are vastly different, especially in average intelligence, and as such in average norms, traditions, values, institutions, and resulting economies and standards of living.

    The way we ‘get along’ is to return to the ‘conflict of civilizations’ which is now the conflict of federations of advanced civilizations against the empires of failed imperial civilizations.

    Civilizations must satisfy the genetics and consequences of genetics, of the people who are born into them. And that means while natural law is a universal good, the means of bringing about anything close to that human condition requires a spectrum of governments from authoritarian to libertarian.

    There is only one truth. There is only one set of laws of nature. There is only one natural law. There is only one means of rule of law by the natural law. But as for governments that organize cooperation, reproduction, production, distribution and trade, No one size fits all.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 18:19:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638968609157312513

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638964425574215681

  • As the founder or principle in a sequence of a couple of the largest privately h

    As the founder or principle in a sequence of a couple of the largest privately held tech and marketing services (consulting) companies in america, I used to recommend that students, if they can, and have the temperament, work for the big consulting firms right out of college, because those jobs will teach you 10x per year what any other job will, and 100x per year what your rather questionable university education did (if it did at all). I’m not sure I would say so any longer. But I think that’s my own bias because of where I see employment stress in the young. If you can gain access to these companies or their customers you’re not in the ‘stressed’ demographic. πŸ˜‰

    Major consulting firms specialize in strategy, management, reorganization, legal, economic, tax, finance, manufacturing, tech, science, HR, marketing, and sales. With oddly, staffing firms included as well (which consulting firms usually treat with a bit of disdain.)

    Now, in my generation, we understood that as law and bureaucracy functioned as the operating system of governments and polities, finance and departments the operating system for manufacturing, that these were maladapted systems for modernity, and that software provided the operating system for human cooperation in organizations. So many of us quickly undrestood that software evolved to reflect best practices, and that with the internet that began to include customer relationship best practices as well.

    So there is a reason for the rise in tech companies that not only supply staff, not only supply project responsibility, not only supply reorganization of organizations using software, but who use software to strategically alighn the entire business from front to back. And this put the rising firms out of technology (like mine) in competition for the bottom and midmarket of the top down management consulting firms – closing the gap between the largest corporations, the midmarket, and up into the Fortune 1000.

    Now, my present company, is in a bit of a holding pattern while my research on law concludes, and the technology of the browser and AI catch up (they have), because there is a difference between visionary and first mover and visionary and being waaay too early for the technology and market to support it. πŸ˜‰ That present company produces an ‘everything app’, that is more of a replacement for the shell (user interface to your computer or device), that completes the transition from disconnected files in ‘file systems’ to interconnected everything that’s aware of how to interact with everything else.

    And our goal for this product is to complete that sequence of human organization by restoring ‘communities’ in business by extreme transparency, end the centralization of data and AI in the internet age, and instead make your AI work for your benefit. That’s why we use the name and domain ‘Runcible’ from Neal Stephenson’s “Diamond Age”. Your device is constantly trying to help you improve and filter out falsehoods, instead of feed centralized data stores that seek to manipulate you for their benefit.

    We can run the whole country (or the world for that matter) on this software. And it has no other ambition (or at least the AI has no other ambition) than helping you discover knowledge, utility, the truth, and to insulate you from falshoods, deceits, and outright lies. πŸ˜‰

    Because that’s the end point of human evolution. Not one where we are slaves to machines serving someone else’s interests rather than our own.

    And that bit of consulting ought to be the most rewarding in history – for organizing people in and across industries. For organizing people in societies for their personal itnersts. And for organizing people in democratic governmetns so that no one can lie to anyone else – which is the most noble ambition I know of.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 13:13:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638891827158831104

  • As the founder or principle in a sequence of a couple of the largest privately h

    As the founder or principle in a sequence of a couple of the largest privately held tech and marketing services (consulting) companies in america, I used to recommend that students, if they can, and have the temperament, work for the big consulting firms right out of college, because those jobs will teach you 10x per year what any other job will, and 100x per year what your rather questionable university education did (if it did at all). I’m not sure I would say so any longer. But I think that’s my own bias because of where I see employment stress in the young. If you can gain access to these companies or their customers you’re not in the ‘stressed’ demographic. πŸ˜‰

    Major consulting firms specialize in strategy, management, reorganization, legal, economic, tax, finance, manufacturing, tech, science, HR, marketing, and sales. With oddly, staffing firms included as well (which consulting firms usually treat with a bit of disdain.)

    Now, in my generation, we understood that as law and bureaucracy functioned as the operating system of governments and polities, finance and departments the operating system for manufacturing, that these were maladapted systems for modernity, and that software provided the operating system for human cooperation in organizations. So many of us quickly undrestood that software evolved to reflect best practices, and that with the internet that began to include customer relationship best practices as well.

    So there is a reason for the rise in tech companies that not only supply staff, not only supply project responsibility, not only supply reorganization of organizations using software, but who use software to strategically alighn the entire business from front to back. And this put the rising firms out of technology (like mine) in competition for the bottom and midmarket of the top down management consulting firms – closing the gap between the largest corporations, the midmarket, and up into the Fortune 1000.

    Now, my present company, is in a bit of a holding pattern while my research on law concludes, and the technology of the browser and AI catch up (they have), because there is a difference between visionary and first mover and visionary and being waaay too early for the technology and market to support it. πŸ˜‰ That present company produces an ‘everything app’, that is more of a replacement for the shell (user interface to your computer or device), that completes the transition from disconnected files in ‘file systems’ to interconnected everything that’s aware of how to interact with everything else.

    And our goal for this product is to complete that sequence of human organization by restoring ‘communities’ in business by extreme transparency, end the centralization of data and AI in the internet age, and instead make your AI work for your benefit. That’s why we use the name and domain ‘Runcible’ from Neal Stephenson’s “Diamond Age”. Your device is constantly trying to help you improve and filter out falsehoods, instead of feed centralized data stores that seek to manipulate you for their benefit.

    We can run the whole country (or the world for that matter) on this software. And it has no other ambition (or at least the AI has no other ambition) than helping you discover knowledge, utility, the truth, and to insulate you from falshoods, deceits, and outright lies. πŸ˜‰

    Because that’s the end point of human evolution. Not one where we are slaves to machines serving someone else’s interests rather than our own.

    And that bit of consulting ought to be the most rewarding in history – for organizing people in and across industries. For organizing people in societies for their personal itnersts. And for organizing people in democratic governmetns so that no one can lie to anyone else – which is the most noble ambition I know of.

    Cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 13:13:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638891827372630020

  • WORTH SHARING Shoe company that produces exceptional products advertising with a

    WORTH SHARING
    Shoe company that produces exceptional products advertising with a photo of narrow-lath (skinny feet) shoes, despite that they produce narrow to wide lath shoes for everyone’s feet across the spectrum.
    I saw an opportunity to ‘share’ a criticism and suggestion for… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638883479029964801

  • IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the

    IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
    Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
    Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
    More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299973734400

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668

  • IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the

    IQ isn’t poorly correlated with income. Instead the correlation decreases as the population under that IQ decreases, and as the utility additional wealth decreases. In other words, making more money is increasingly difficult above the obvious threshold, and the utility of it decreases.
    Combined with IQ is a wealth substitute in that there is less value in wealth as IQ increases, becuase consumables decrease in utility, and risk approaches zero for smart people.
    Wealth doesn’t corrlate with IQ as much as expected because trait conscientiousness is more important for accumulating wealth across the entire distribution.
    More variables but IQ is a great example of the variation of incentives as IQ increases and decreases.

    Reply addressees: @ooooobelix


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-21 22:51:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638312299843796992

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638299639731441668

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @AlpsmanNorth @elagabalus__ @TheAutistocrat WHY DO NY, CAL, A

    RT @curtdoolittle: @AlpsmanNorth @elagabalus__ @TheAutistocrat WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME?
    (and why are they organized c…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:07:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636066498799124480

  • WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME? (and why are they organized crime

    WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME?
    (and why are they organized crime syndicates under pretense of city states? How are they even worse than tax havens?)

    Interesting decomposition into causes?

    (a) Why does consumer credit require paying interest to banks if we’re just borrowing from ourselves in the future through the treasury? (rent seeking)

    (b) Why does the private sector profit from investing insurance and pensions but neither are ‘covered’, and instead insured by the government? (privatizing commons, socializing losses)

    (c) Why do we give copyright protections when the original purpose was only to provide a means of taxation? There is no reason for copyright protections. Instead only for creative commons protections. (rent seeking) And why can the entertainment industry engage in organized sedition?

    (d) Why can the academy sell diplomas without warranty of (certification) of competency for employment AND guarrentee of employment? Worse, why can teh academy teach anything that’s false and irreciprocal rather than not false and reciprocal (true, and moral)? (fraud) And why can the academy and education industry engage in organized sedition?

    REVOKE THE LEFT’S PERMISSION FOR CONDUCTING ORGANIZED CRIME
    If we took away those four ‘privileges’ how would the left, who, does not engage in any productive work, survive? So why do we allow ourselves to fund the left, when by rent seeking, privatization of commons and socialization of losses, and systemic fraud, they constitute a vast organized crime syndicate using ‘baiting into hazard’ without liability for the harms done by their false promises?

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:04:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636065752317935616

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636061670521860098

  • WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME? (and why are they organized crime

    WHY DO NY, CAL, AND DC PRODUCE TAXABLE INCOME?
    (and why are they organized crime syndicates under pretense of city states? How are they even worse than tax havens?)

    Interesting decomposition into causes?

    (a) Why does consumer credit require paying interest to banks if we’re just borrowing from ourselves in the future through the treasury? (rent seeking)

    (b) Why does the private sector profit from investing insurance and pensions but neither are ‘covered’, and instead insured by the government? (privatizing commons, socializing losses)

    (c) Why do we give copyright protections when the original purpose was only to provide a means of taxation? There is no reason for copyright protections. Instead only for creative commons protections. (rent seeking) And why can the entertainment industry engage in organized sedition?

    (d) Why can the academy sell diplomas without warranty of (certification) of competency for employment AND guarrentee of employment? Worse, why can teh academy teach anything that’s false and irreciprocal rather than not false and reciprocal (true, and moral)? (fraud) And why can the academy and education industry engage in organized sedition?

    REVOKE THE LEFT’S PERMISSION FOR CONDUCTING ORGANIZED CRIME
    If we took away those four ‘privileges’ how would the left, who, does not engage in any productive work, survive? So why do we allow ourselves to fund the left, when by rent seeking, privatization of commons and socialization of losses, and systemic fraud, they constitute a vast organized crime syndicate using ‘baiting into hazard’ without liability for the harms done by their false promises?

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Reply addressees: @AlpsmanNorth @elagabalus__ @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 18:04:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636065752129183748

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636061670521860098