Theme: Productivity
-
2.2 Million New Jobs Since Election… Record low unemployment rate for manufact
2.2 Million New Jobs Since Election… Record low unemployment rate for manufacturing… Hispanic unemployment rate drops to 4.7% – LOWEST in history of USA… MORE… -
2.2 Million New Jobs Since Election… Record low unemployment rate for manufact
2.2 Million New Jobs Since Election… Record low unemployment rate for manufacturing… Hispanic unemployment rate drops to 4.7% – LOWEST in history of USA… MORE… -
so concentration of capital occurred at the entrepreneurial level, and wasn’t po
so concentration of capital occurred at the entrepreneurial level, and wasn’t possible to concentrate at the top. Production was entrepreneurial and distributed. But took metalsmithing, and agrarian production, and organization for competitiveness.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-07 18:38:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938840040624590848
Reply addressees: @SmashMarxCult
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938737227831611392
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938737227831611392
-
River valleys concentrated production, produced surpluses, and could be ruled by
River valleys concentrated production, produced surpluses, and could be ruled by a concentrated force because of it. Ranchers and farmers less so. Steppe and desert could not concentrate capital. Jungles could not make it happen because of predators and disease.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-07 18:33:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938838943310794752
Reply addressees: @SmashMarxCult
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938737227831611392
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/938737227831611392
-
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter)
The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT)
The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k.
The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day….
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-06 14:34:00 UTC
-
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter) The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT) The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k. The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day…. -
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets
The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter) The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT) The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k. The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day…. -
“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything the
—“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks
That’s not true – if anything they’re underpaid. Doctors are (empirically) the most talented subroup in america, spending an absurd amount of wealth on their educations, and their cost per patient is trivial. The problem is the overhead administration costs of regulation placed upon doctors and the vast army of clerks that are needed to support them. (that’s the deal, really).
A doctor takes four years undergraduate, four years medical school, and three to seven years of internship, before they are eligible for a license. And they are in control of your life and death. A doctor’s average salary is 180k (round up to 200k). Thats 15 years of training. They have huge debt to repay – usually around 170k.
Now, if you are say, a computer software engineer with the same or higher IQ than a doctor, you need little or no university education, although it helps dramatically, and if you work equally as hard, you can make as much as a doctor does for fifteen more years than a doctor does.
So 15*200,000 = $3m + 250k for medical school, + 100K for university degree = $3.35M. Now, a resident for – let’s take an average of four years – is paid an average of 55K per year. So that’s 200-55 = 145k * 4 years = 580K. So 3.35M + .58M = $3.9M.
Now, that means that a 30 year old MD has accumulated an average of 170k in debt before he can earn that income, despite being one of our top performing people. But can work 45 to 50 years once obtaining that – while paying an average of 20k liability insurance per year.
Now, a software developer cannot (and need not) work that many years, but by his late 30’s has earned millions of dollars.
The principle benefits to being a doctor are social and long term financial, for the simple reason of ever-increasing demand, and persistent shortage.
The primary threat to your income is not the market but the government.
Source date (UTC): 2017-12-05 16:55:00 UTC
-
“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything the
—“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything they’re underpaid. Doctors are (empirically) the most talented subroup in america, spending an absurd amount of wealth on their educations, and their cost per patient is trivial. The problem is the overhead administration costs of regulation placed upon doctors and the vast army of clerks that are needed to support them. (that’s the deal, really). A doctor takes four years undergraduate, four years medical school, and three to seven years of internship, before they are eligible for a license. And they are in control of your life and death. A doctor’s average salary is 180k (round up to 200k). Thats 15 years of training. They have huge debt to repay – usually around 170k. Now, if you are say, a computer software engineer with the same or higher IQ than a doctor, you need little or no university education, although it helps dramatically, and if you work equally as hard, you can make as much as a doctor does for fifteen more years than a doctor does. So 15*200,000 = $3m + 250k for medical school, + 100K for university degree = $3.35M. Now, a resident for – let’s take an average of four years – is paid an average of 55K per year. So that’s 200-55 = 145k * 4 years = 580K. So 3.35M + .58M = $3.9M. Now, that means that a 30 year old MD has accumulated an average of 170k in debt before he can earn that income, despite being one of our top performing people. But can work 45 to 50 years once obtaining that – while paying an average of 20k liability insurance per year. Now, a software developer cannot (and need not) work that many years, but by his late 30’s has earned millions of dollars. The principle benefits to being a doctor are social and long term financial, for the simple reason of ever-increasing demand, and persistent shortage. The primary threat to your income is not the market but the government. -
“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything the
—“Doctors are paid way too much”— Robin Banks That’s not true – if anything they’re underpaid. Doctors are (empirically) the most talented subroup in america, spending an absurd amount of wealth on their educations, and their cost per patient is trivial. The problem is the overhead administration costs of regulation placed upon doctors and the vast army of clerks that are needed to support them. (that’s the deal, really). A doctor takes four years undergraduate, four years medical school, and three to seven years of internship, before they are eligible for a license. And they are in control of your life and death. A doctor’s average salary is 180k (round up to 200k). Thats 15 years of training. They have huge debt to repay – usually around 170k. Now, if you are say, a computer software engineer with the same or higher IQ than a doctor, you need little or no university education, although it helps dramatically, and if you work equally as hard, you can make as much as a doctor does for fifteen more years than a doctor does. So 15*200,000 = $3m + 250k for medical school, + 100K for university degree = $3.35M. Now, a resident for – let’s take an average of four years – is paid an average of 55K per year. So that’s 200-55 = 145k * 4 years = 580K. So 3.35M + .58M = $3.9M. Now, that means that a 30 year old MD has accumulated an average of 170k in debt before he can earn that income, despite being one of our top performing people. But can work 45 to 50 years once obtaining that – while paying an average of 20k liability insurance per year. Now, a software developer cannot (and need not) work that many years, but by his late 30’s has earned millions of dollars. The principle benefits to being a doctor are social and long term financial, for the simple reason of ever-increasing demand, and persistent shortage. The primary threat to your income is not the market but the government.