Theme: Productivity

  • The Military Industrial Complex Is a Good Thing.

      —“What’s wrong with the military industrial complex?”—Steve Pender (rhetorical question) Nothing. At it’s very worst it is: (a) the optimum research and development investment, and (b) the optimum means of economic redistribution, (c) the optimum means of producing male investment in the social order, (d) the optimum means of producing male prosociality. (Besides we replaced it with the Cathedral complex and that’s the worst possible of each.)

  • Wage vs Income: Told Ya So

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-06-26/seattle-s-painful-lesson-on-the-road-to-a-15-minimum-wage
    1) For every 1 percent increase in their hourly wage, low-wage workers saw a 3 percent reduction in the number of hours worked. As a result, they lost about $125 in earnings a month, clawing back the entire gain from the earlier hike and more. 2) THE EFFECT IS NON LINEAR AND ACCELERATES RAPIDLY
  • Wage vs Income: Told Ya So

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-06-26/seattle-s-painful-lesson-on-the-road-to-a-15-minimum-wage
    1) For every 1 percent increase in their hourly wage, low-wage workers saw a 3 percent reduction in the number of hours worked. As a result, they lost about $125 in earnings a month, clawing back the entire gain from the earlier hike and more. 2) THE EFFECT IS NON LINEAR AND ACCELERATES RAPIDLY
  • IT IS VERY HARD NOT TO SPECIALIZE – FOR NOW At our stage of development when we

    IT IS VERY HARD NOT TO SPECIALIZE – FOR NOW

    At our stage of development when we are at an in-between stage, and very nearly at the limit of our ability to construct tools (experiments) by which to conduct observations (measurements), yet unable to discover the pattern of relations that describe the next levels of complexity (the structure of the universe on one end and sentience on the other, and where we have all but exhausted research into subjects at human scale, we have passed the point at which one can spend enough time on enough subjects to master their application. It is however possible to master the fundamental patterns that cross all disciplines. The reason being that there are a very small number of fundamental laws. And to some degree the grammar and semantics we are searching for, consists of that set of categories, relations, values and operations (transforms).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-04 07:08:00 UTC

  • YA SO 1) For every 1 percent increase in their hourly wage, low-wage workers saw

    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-06-26/seattle-s-painful-lesson-on-the-road-to-a-15-minimum-wageTOLD YA SO

    1) For every 1 percent increase in their hourly wage, low-wage workers saw a 3 percent reduction in the number of hours worked. As a result, they lost about $125 in earnings a month, clawing back the entire gain from the earlier hike and more.

    2) THE EFFECT IS NON LINEAR AND ACCELERATES RAPIDLY


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 20:23:00 UTC

  • HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. by Richard Nikoley. He covers the i

    https://t.co/qHavlgG4CjPROPERTARIANISM. HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR.

    by Richard Nikoley. He covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy. https://t.co/qHavlgG4Cj


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 19:17:00 UTC

  • HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR. by Richard Nikoley. He covers the i

    https://t.co/qHavlgG4CjPROPERTARIANISM. HOW WE ALL GET ALONG. THE DIVISION OF LABOR.

    by Richard Nikoley. He covers the intertemporal division of perception, cognition, labor, and advocacy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-03 19:17:00 UTC

  • by Michael Churchill Well the thinking here is a bit sloppy. Tactile people are

    by Michael Churchill

    Well the thinking here is a bit sloppy. Tactile people are very good at tactile jobs. You don’t want mathematicians doing gardening or housecleaning. Housecleaners are often quite efficient. Latinos have a reputation for extremely hard work ethics. So I’m not sure what he’s getting at here. You just need the right man for the job. Tactiles for tactile work, intuitives for idea work.

    If somebody is lazy, well that’s different. Is laziness really correlated to IQ? Maybe but it can’t be a 1-1 correlation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-01 13:30:00 UTC

  • LAUNCHING SUCCESSFUL TECH The problem is the same I have chastised microsoft man

    LAUNCHING SUCCESSFUL TECH

    The problem is the same I have chastised microsoft management about for most of my twenty years of involvement with them: technology is only ten percent as useful as the demo apps upon which applications are built. I was right then, and I’m right now. If you look at PHP for example, without the frameworks the language would be nearly dead. But because of the frameworks it lives. (its why I use it). I wrote the “Microsoft Access Solutions Pack” for Microsoft “back in the day” and it consisted of four fully functional applications, plus the utility library I developed for overcoming the weaknesses in the access architecture. It sold enough copies, but the interesting observation is that for a decade the basis of the better applications depended upon those demo apps and that library.

    The tech is less valuable than the application framework (plug and play basic app) and the ‘full size’ demo apps are more valuable than the framework.

    The reason is very simple, if you can’t produce a framework, and you can’t produce a suite of demo apps, you either aren’t ready to go to market, haven’t actually tested your tech, and have no idea whether it serves any material purpose.

    Tech survives at the EDGES, not the CORE of technology, because it is the EDGES that are uncommon, not the cores.

    Thus endeth the lesson that is always ignored.

    Microsoft chose to improve tools rather than demo apps because they had sufficient network effect that people would invest anyway.

    But once you understand microsoft tools were built on basic and vb3 to create that network you understand why they could do it.

    Holochain needs an out of the box running framework, making use of well understood design patterns, to dominate the market. Otherwise the cost of entry is simply too high for rapid market expansion. If Demo apps were created on top of that framework, then it would be a done deal. But the instinct of programmers is to work with core tech that has no customers where they have to solve real world problems, so that they’re just masturbating, and so rather than falsify their labors by producing applications that prove the utility of their plumbing they preserve the illusions and preserve their ignorance of application of that tech as a means of preserving their illusions (fantasies). We get paid for application tech, not invention tech.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-30 09:27:00 UTC

  • A WORLD WITHOUT MONEY? —“What would happen if there were no money on earth?”–

    A WORLD WITHOUT MONEY?

    —“What would happen if there were no money on earth?”–

    (Repost) Answered May 1, 2013

    Believe it or not, this subject has been given quite a bit of treatment in the literature – mostly during the early part of the last century in response to the communist, socialist and fascist movements.

    REALITY:

    Almost everyone, on the planet, except for perhaps ~500M subsistence farmers would die in the first 30-90 days. Yes. Really. Seriously.

    MONEY

    Money makes planning of complex things possible.

    Humans literally cannot ‘think’ as we understand the term, without numbers, money, property, contracts, credit and interest. Just as drawings and written words help us remember things, numbers help us remember things we could not remember, think about, or compare without them. Money makes numbers possible to apply to things that are DIFFERENT. Whereas numbers without money can only be used for things that are the SAME. As such, we say that money makes it possible to compare objects that are otherwise incommensurable. Money renders the world commensurable: open to planning and the use of mathematics (measurement and forecasting).

    In practical terms, money and prices form an information system that tells us all what to do in real time in response to what others want and need. It is how we tell each other how to cooperate. It is the human social system. And the use of that social system, plus the capture of fossile fuel, has taken us out of ignorance and poverty.

    CONVERSELY

    What money and credit have also done is make it possible to breed again up to new malthusian levels. While Malthus was only half right, he was half right. Group selection accomplishes what malthus did not account for. THe general belief of ‘progressives’ is that technology will ‘save us again’ just like agrarianism, and then pastoralism saved us in the past. But the truth is we just breed up to these levels again, and reduce ourselves back to poverty.

    The problem then is that we must control our breeding. And that has been, except for a brief period in china, or the middle ages in England under Manorialism impossible to achieve. Partly because it is so profitable to sell things to people who bear children, and those children as they too mature.

    EXAMPLES

    THe US economy is primarily driven by housing, and the high rate of return on lending for housing, and the large supply of labor jobs for the production of housing. From this perspective, the exceptional nature of the american economy is not the product of ‘democracy’ or innovation, but the product of selling off a continent to waves of immigrants and their offspring, and using the profits from the sale of the (conquered) continent to invest in increasingly complex technologies.

    THe Chinese for example have figured this out and are doing the same thing but moving people from the ‘poor’ village farm to cities where they *hope* the population will be more productive than they were at subsistence farming. China can do this bcause it adopted consumer capitalism (money, prices and interest) and abandoned communism (no money, no prices, and no interest).

    The problem other countries face (India and say, Ukraine) is india is so pervasively corrupt that it’s not possible to create infrastructure without privatization of the investment through corruption, and the population is still expanding unsustainably in a dirty and hot environment. THe problem Ukraine faces, is that it cannot play ‘china’ because the lower levels of government are so corrupt and the country sees no demand for its currency, so the government cannot issue credit, and therefore the people remain poor.

    IN CLOSING

    When you say ‘money went away’ what you must also understand is that with money and prices will go the ability to communicate, and think. Literally. Humans would not be able to cooperate, communicate, plan and think without money. Worse, they would have no incentive to do so, because to have an incentive one must be able to think of something to do. And you couldn’t think of anything to do that you couldn’t do with your own two hands.

    THere is about 4 days worth of energy, and 14 days worth of food in the pipeline. If you made money vanish, you would need to make 6B people vanish along with it.

    You may find a more thorough, or a more simplistic answer elsewhere. But this is the answer, and there isn’t any alternative.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 21:35:00 UTC