Curt Doolittle

Theme: Productivity

  • And worse they are masking decline by increases in consumption without correspon

    And worse they are masking decline by increases in consumption without corresponding increases in productivity.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-13 19:09:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105908686617280514

    Reply addressees: @LichLasagna

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105904276985909248

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105904276985909248

  • Try not to (a) be a moron, (b) countersignal the economics, (c) illustrate that

    Try not to (a) be a moron, (b) countersignal the economics, (c) illustrate that you’re a an economic denialist just like the left is a race and gender denialist. I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to help those of you who can’t help but do so.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-13 18:19:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105896052559937536

    Reply addressees: @craigcrimes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105894504421306369

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1105894504421306369

  • INTEREST AND TIME Consumption vs Production 1. Production REQUIRES interest to c

    INTEREST AND TIME

    Consumption vs Production

    1. Production REQUIRES interest to calculate time.

    2. Consumption does NOT REQUIRE interest to calculate time.

    3. Time has already been calculated.

    4. It was either a good calculation or a bad one.

    This is one of those things I unconsciously assume is obvious because I already convert all economic and financial statements into statements of time.

    But Michael reminds me tonight that it isn’t obvious.

    I suppose I’ve convinced everyone who wasn’t thinking in terms of property to do so but I have clearly failed to convince everyone to convert property into time, because it is time that we create and purchase all property with and we make time by saving time by cooperation in a division of labor.

    I mean, that’s what productivity means: measurable returns on time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 19:57:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53294677_10157034246837264_531658659

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/53294677_10157034246837264_5316586590896652288_n_10157034246827264.jpg Connor WhittlawProtectionism of productive people. Wew that’s a good oneMar 7, 2019, 3:15 PMStephen ThomasHa!

    Brilliant!

    Propertarianism= Protecting the productive!

    Absolutely love this. With a small amount of explanation and elaboration, this could very well be the “gospel” of P. Everyone can understand this.Mar 7, 2019, 3:34 PMShannon Constantine Loganthis made me smileMar 7, 2019, 4:19 PMGünther Shroomachershit, you did it in 3 words, lolMar 7, 2019, 9:32 PMStephen ThomasI was gonna do it in 2. lol

    But it makes less sense that way.Mar 7, 2019, 9:36 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-07 15:02:00 UTC

  • “We create inequality by mere competence.”–JWarren Prescott

    —“We create inequality by mere competence.”–JWarren Prescott

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-06 10:49:00 UTC

  • “The closer one gets to the top of one of these hierarchies the more one realize

    —“The closer one gets to the top of one of these hierarchies the more one realizes how absolutely dependent one is on those below. Finance is nothing without the entrepreneur. Generals are nothing without warriors.”—Michael Churchill

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 19:24:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1102288551058657280

  • “The closer one gets to the top of one of these hierarchies the more one realize

    —“The closer one gets to the top of one of these hierarchies the more one realizes how absolutely dependent one is on those below. Finance is nothing without the entrepreneur. Generals are nothing without warriors.”—Michael Churchill

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-03 14:23:00 UTC

  • NEXT STEP IN EVOLUTION IS HERE. WE MUST REORGANIZE TO EXPLOIT IT. THE NEXT STEP

    http://expand-your-consciousness.com/autistic-teenager-higher-iq-einstein-path-noble-prize/THE NEXT STEP IN EVOLUTION IS HERE. WE MUST REORGANIZE TO EXPLOIT IT. THE NEXT STEP IN HIGH INVESTMENT PARENTING.

    My view is that autistics (like me) are the next step in neoteny, and that this next step in our ‘evolution’ require an additional leap in high investment parenting, just like homo-sapiens required an additional leap in high investment parenting.

    RE: http://expand-your-consciousness.com/autistic-teenager-higher-iq-einstein-path-noble-prize/

    “LIfe Skills” are a female code word for “don’t leave us behind in evolutionary development”. The feminine mind fears leaving behind, the masculine mind fears not running ahead.

    Women demonstrably infantilize generations at every opportunity.

    Our next revolution in government is to undo the damage done by women’s infantilization of the polity, economy, and civilization, by eliminating the artificial construct we call childhood, and adding 15 years back to our productive development, and participation.

    My grandmother knit and sold mittens by the time she was four. Children were usually employed (particularly girls) by ages of five or six. Boys began their trades at seven. Boys commended ships at the age of twelve. Generals at the age of 14. We are graduating people from college with 100K in debt that don’t understand compound interest, basic economics, or the natural inequality of peoples – all because of the demands of women to ‘maintain influence and control’ – because they naturally lack the ability to do so by dominance in competition.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-02 11:07:00 UTC

  • UNDERSTAND NEGATIVE VS POSITIVE COMPETITION (The Economics of Time) (core) In po

    UNDERSTAND NEGATIVE VS POSITIVE COMPETITION

    (The Economics of Time) (core)

    In positive ( market ) competition we compete for the seizure of unseized opportunities (potential capital), by increasing the time content of the products and services we offer whether by price or quality.

    In negative (anti-market) competition we compete for the seizure of previously seized opportunities, thereby stealing (decreasing) the time content (existential capital).

    Capital consists of a store of time produced by human actions.

    When we divide labor we decrease the time demand for production.

    In the via negativa, we do not produce more, we increase the rate of production in time.

    All of economics is the study of time and energy just like all of physics is the study of time and energy. The difference is that universe can’t choose, and because we can remember, act, sympathize, and cooperate, we can save time.

    In this sense we are not wealthier than our pre-language ancestors, we have simply made everything drastically cheaper by cooperating and saving time, first in production and second in the form of capital: stored time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-27 10:08:00 UTC

  • we must defeat time. division of labor defeats time. assets stores time. money s

    we must defeat time. division of labor defeats time. assets stores time. money stores time in measurable divisible form. prices calculate time.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:01:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099217631335378944

    Reply addressees: @dagmar_schmitt @borzoopovic @AnatomicallyOK

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099214923903561728

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GudistGrug

    @curtdoolittle @borzoopovic @AnatomicallyOK There is a element of money that seems to collapse all thing into one, and all time to the present. The most financialized societies seem to all follow the same path, everything revolving around pleasure in the present. Why is this?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099214923903561728