Curt Doolittle

Theme: Productivity

  • Obama didn’t do anything other than ride the normal business cycle. He certainly

    Obama didn’t do anything other than ride the normal business cycle. He certainly didn’t do what I (right), or Galbraith (Left) recommended. He didn’t end the wars like Trump. He didn’t repatriate business. He didn’t force europeans to pay for their defense, or stop chinese theft.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 14:40:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185566449580105732

    Reply addressees: @GlobalNewsTH

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185566044443860997

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @GlobalNewsTH The Clintons are the most corrupt people ever to hold office (they stole 2M from me personally). We don’t have evidence that Trump did anything except work in finance, construction, maintenance, and food service industries in a world where corruption is a cost of doing business.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185566044443860997

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @GlobalNewsTH The Clintons are the most corrupt people ever to hold office (they stole 2M from me personally). We don’t have evidence that Trump did anything except work in finance, construction, maintenance, and food service industries in a world where corruption is a cost of doing business.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185566044443860997

  • FRANCE VS USA VS JAPAN —“Working time. In France, the legal length of the work

    FRANCE VS USA VS JAPAN

    —“Working time. In France, the legal length of the working week is 35 hours in all types of companies. The working day may not exceed 10 hours.”—

    This strategy is… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=487920221804873&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 13:31:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185549008187592704

  • As if obama had ANY influence on the business cycle that didn’t make it worse, a

    As if obama had ANY influence on the business cycle that didn’t make it worse, and as if Trump hasn’t systematically worked to repatriate business to the USA.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 13:12:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185544325498884096

    Reply addressees: @GlobalNewsTH @Breaking911

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185022170411356161

    IN REPLY TO:

    @GlobalNewsTH

    @Breaking911 Yes Obama was! https://t.co/xscdFGVjam

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185022170411356161

  • As if obama had ANY influence on the business cycle that didn’t make it worse, a

    As if obama had ANY influence on the business cycle that didn’t make it worse, and as if Trump hasn’t systematically worked to repatriate business to the USA.

    —“Why does it bother you that a black President could succeed after being handed aftermath of 2 recessions + 2 wars. If you don’t know tRump by now your education has failed you. #TrumpRussia Mafia Giuliani Ukraine Visa Mob Ties Russia.” — Global News Thailand 🇹🇭 สาระความรู้

    Why would his being black have anything to do with anything? Why does it bother you that someone who specializes in disambiguating pseudoscience from pseudoscience states the rather obvious that obama furthered the global parasitism and Trump undermines global parasitism.

    The Clintons are the most corrupt people ever to hold office (they stole 2M from me personally). We don’t have evidence that Trump did anything except work in finance, construction, maintenance, and food service industries in a world where corruption is a cost of doing business.

    Obama didn’t do anything other than ride the normal business cycle. He certainly didn’t do what I (right), or Galbraith (Left) recommended. He didn’t end the wars like Trump. He didn’t repatriate business. He didn’t force europeans to pay for their defense, or stop chinese theft.

    And as far as we know Russian interference was to sew discord (undermine, in proper marxist, pomo, feminist tradition) in both parties – which is where Russian intelligence spends 70% of their resources – finding ‘useful idiots’ like you and feeding them ‘desirable’ propaganda.

    Russians learned from the Marxists, Bolsheviks, Feminists and Postmodernists, that it is cheaper to sew discord and undermine from within, than to fight economically (they can’t) or militarily (they can’t) or politically (they can’t).

    The female competitive strategy is to undermine by gossiping, rallying, shaming, ridiculing, moralizing, psychologizing, straw manning, disapproval, and denial (verbal) and the male strategy is economic political and military (material). Russians use the female strategy.

    And that is what you’re doing. Because undermining, disapproval, lying, and denial are necessary to obscure undesirable truth and falsehood.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 10:49:00 UTC

  • WRITING NONFICTION BOOKS It’s very unlikely you can write a book. It’s likely yo

    WRITING NONFICTION BOOKS

    It’s very unlikely you can write a book. It’s likely you can write a paper. Its likely if you can write a series of papers that you can combine them into a book. Most of the time a paper is sufficient for a book. A book merely provides a set of historical examples, or hypothetical examples, that illustrate the sequence of dependencies on the one and and applications on the other.

    So, learn to write arguments (2pp). Then combine arguments into a paper (20pp), then papers into a book (200pp+).

    Most authors write books to document their learning experience. This is different from pretense that you have a problem figured out until you have finished your learning experience, accumulated sets of arguments, sets of papers (arguments in context) and can combine them into a book (narrations of examples past and potential that illustrate each argument and paper).

    There is a reason all libertarian books are introductory. There is a reason all feminist and anti-western authors write in postmodern prose. There is a reason philosophy is written in rationalism rather than the law of reciprocity. So that they can lie. Conversely, there is a reason hard science is written in operational language – so they cannot lie.

    cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 15:55:00 UTC

  • Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false,

    Economic (productive) is not a necessity (‘square’) however unproductive (false, irreciprocal, parasitic, predatory) does (‘square’) in-group, while such questions as ethics and morality are then meaningless out-group. In other words, predation is always adaptive for some…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:58:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184574304366845952

    Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184568198940618752

    IN REPLY TO:

    @MattPirkowski

    @curtdoolittle Whereas ethical integrity, in this context, represents the capacity to recognize that what is economically expedient does not always square with what is adaptive. Money, especially in its current form, cares nothing of humanity’s sustainable time preference.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184568198940618752

  • That isn’t demonstrably true in entrepreneurship in fact, the data since the 80′

    That isn’t demonstrably true in entrepreneurship in fact, the data since the 80’s has been consistently the opposite, and that rust (moral, ethical) is deterministic in success. Yes, wome economic functions are amoral (finance) and some immoral (advertising, entertainment).

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:26:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184566376775782403

    Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181387125159268352

    IN REPLY TO:

    @MattPirkowski

    Money is easy to acquire in proportion to the degree one is either willing to compromise—or has not developed—their ethical integrity.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181387125159268352

  • (all but eliminates undesirables, all but eliminates back office accounting, all

    (all but eliminates undesirables, all but eliminates back office accounting, all but eliminates auditing, and all but eliminates employee theft. )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 20:20:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184564745367629831

    Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183286037998534658

    IN REPLY TO:

    @MattPirkowski

    If you think this slowly tightening noose stops at the Chinese border, you’ve got another thing coming… https://t.co/rFHNBWJZOL

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1183286037998534658

  • Our success that made women’s ‘liberation’ from household chores, and productive

    Our success that made women’s ‘liberation’ from household chores, and productive enough to hire substitute mothers, was the product of 1500+years of eugenics, as much as it was our strange male obsession with truth reciprocity and institutions of continuous competition.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227514887086082

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227514010472449

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Envy, Revolt against Nature. Demand for greater gains for less contributions. Yes. But the west advanced beyond the rest by legal sovereignty, reciprocity, truth before face, judgement by jury, and resulting markets in all aspects of life – domesticating (Eugenics) the worst.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227514010472449

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Envy, Revolt against Nature. Demand for greater gains for less contributions. Yes. But the west advanced beyond the rest by legal sovereignty, reciprocity, truth before face, judgement by jury, and resulting markets in all aspects of life – domesticating (Eugenics) the worst.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227514010472449

  • NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne Short Answer: Q: “When will women be hum

    NOTES ON DOWN GIRL – THREAD @kate_manne
    Short Answer:
    Q: “When will women be human? When?” asked feminist legal theorist, Catharine A. MacKinnon, in a 1999 essay.
    A: When Truth, Productive and Accumulative, and Eugenic, take precedence over Approval, Consumption and Dysgenia.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227508214030336