Oct 21, 2019, 2:44 PM 1) spaces are now general purpose rather than designed for function. This makes them less amenable to artistic treatment because they have to be ‘resold’. 2) Postwar materials (steel, glass, and panel products) are not amenable to organic arts, and it’s organic arts that constitute the majority of the western thematic tradition – particularly the human form. 3) Architectural software is .. great for engineering and tradesmen but tends to produce ‘sh-tty’ attempts at imitating Lloyd Wright – to mid century, as if the Craftsman never happened. But at least soviet concrete brutalism is done. Fk. Great for government buildings. Sh-t for the artwork they decorated it with. 4) Hollywood is a black hole for the arts, because it’s possible to make money at it on and off, while keeping ‘other jobs’ going. 5) Camera first, large printers second and Digital third has eliminated much of the handicraft that went into the production of durable arts. 6) Decoration will fit anywhere but “Art” (meaning, craftsmanship, materials) has been successfully undermined by the marxist-pomo-feminist tradition, and intentional deprivation of citizens from education in the heroic tradition – replaced with the victim tradition has made high art impossible or unmarketable. 7) The economics of producing inventory vs the percent of sales is such that, say, if you want to produce 200k of income for a gallery and 60K of income for yourself, you have to do the math on how much time and materials you can put into each work. So at an average of 10k per piece, that means 20ps must sell, that means no less than five galleries, that means 40 pcs in inventory at all times. And that’s only so many days or weeks per piece. Most people produce a production line, and use it to finance their artwork. (I know art jewelry, print and panting the best.) Scale up to sculpture then to play, then to film, and down to print and farther down to photo and farther down to posters and kitch but the general math is the same -just like every other biz. There is a reason single digits of artists make a living, and instead work to fund their art hobby that generates lunch money.
Theme: Productivity
-
Economic Influences on Today’s Art World
Oct 21, 2019, 2:44 PM 1) spaces are now general purpose rather than designed for function. This makes them less amenable to artistic treatment because they have to be ‘resold’. 2) Postwar materials (steel, glass, and panel products) are not amenable to organic arts, and it’s organic arts that constitute the majority of the western thematic tradition – particularly the human form. 3) Architectural software is .. great for engineering and tradesmen but tends to produce ‘sh-tty’ attempts at imitating Lloyd Wright – to mid century, as if the Craftsman never happened. But at least soviet concrete brutalism is done. Fk. Great for government buildings. Sh-t for the artwork they decorated it with. 4) Hollywood is a black hole for the arts, because it’s possible to make money at it on and off, while keeping ‘other jobs’ going. 5) Camera first, large printers second and Digital third has eliminated much of the handicraft that went into the production of durable arts. 6) Decoration will fit anywhere but “Art” (meaning, craftsmanship, materials) has been successfully undermined by the marxist-pomo-feminist tradition, and intentional deprivation of citizens from education in the heroic tradition – replaced with the victim tradition has made high art impossible or unmarketable. 7) The economics of producing inventory vs the percent of sales is such that, say, if you want to produce 200k of income for a gallery and 60K of income for yourself, you have to do the math on how much time and materials you can put into each work. So at an average of 10k per piece, that means 20ps must sell, that means no less than five galleries, that means 40 pcs in inventory at all times. And that’s only so many days or weeks per piece. Most people produce a production line, and use it to finance their artwork. (I know art jewelry, print and panting the best.) Scale up to sculpture then to play, then to film, and down to print and farther down to photo and farther down to posters and kitch but the general math is the same -just like every other biz. There is a reason single digits of artists make a living, and instead work to fund their art hobby that generates lunch money.
-
Usury
Oct 28, 2019, 1:23 PM USURY (repost) Interest vs Usury. Interest is necessary for the organization of complex production. it is beneficial for production of generations. It is risky for the purpose of consumption. It is harmful for the production of entertainment. It is very harmful for the production of anti-social behaviors. What demarcates Interest from Usury?
(a) credit for consumption rather than production. (b) borrower beware rather than lender beware. (c) collateral If lending is limited to production, lender risk, and un-recoverability for anything other than fraud, then it’s shared risk. And it increases use of stock markets where access to liquidity is possible instead of collateral recovery. The enemy’s technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard, by the extension of credit for the purpose of consumption, the use of collateral, and the use of the court to transfer assets to the lender. The enemy’s technique uses every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and critique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional
-
Usury
Oct 28, 2019, 1:23 PM USURY (repost) Interest vs Usury. Interest is necessary for the organization of complex production. it is beneficial for production of generations. It is risky for the purpose of consumption. It is harmful for the production of entertainment. It is very harmful for the production of anti-social behaviors. What demarcates Interest from Usury?
(a) credit for consumption rather than production. (b) borrower beware rather than lender beware. (c) collateral If lending is limited to production, lender risk, and un-recoverability for anything other than fraud, then it’s shared risk. And it increases use of stock markets where access to liquidity is possible instead of collateral recovery. The enemy’s technique consists of false promise, baiting in to moral hazard, pilpul, critique, and profiting from capture of hazards, and capitalizing those captures as systems of rents. Usury is the most common example of baiting into hazard, by the extension of credit for the purpose of consumption, the use of collateral, and the use of the court to transfer assets to the lender. The enemy’s technique uses every possible means of baiting into hazard, defending this bait by pilpul and critique, profiting from the hazard – both private and public – then taking the accumulated capital and seeking rents against the population until they revolt and prosecute their revenge. … There is a reason this technique works with high trust europeans but not elsewhere. There is a reason it works with women and underclasses but not established men. Because our democracy makes us vulnerable to false promise, and the underclasses are easily baited by false promise, we are tolerant of meritocracy until too late. Worse, it is easiest to exploit our social order of MARKETS and LAGGING legal codes in defense of those markets and our people. And lagging technology for replacing each of the means of parasitism: financial, commercial, educational, informational, political, social, normative, and traditional
-
Teaching Is a Three Year Vocational Program.
Nov 10, 2019, 3:33 PM TEACHING IS A THREE YEAR VOCATIONAL PROGAM. 1 – Year Instruction Teachable Skills: +Planning, Continuous Revision. +Lesson Instruction (Teaching) +Assessment (where are my kids) Requires Natural Talent: +Environment (managing the classroom for learning) +Mentoring Teachers – Not to TEACH, but to filter people. 1 – year student teaching (apprenticeship) 1 – year mentored teaching (apprenticeship) Fundamental Problems: (a) teachers spend too much time alone. (b) they are not permitted to create order. (c) there are a limited group of people who can maintain their interest in running a classroom. (d) the method of reforming teaching will require radical reform of the method so that it consists of competitive games and includes multiple overlapping grades, and to decrease pressure on programming (indoctrination) and more emphasis on multiple-exposures over time.
-
Teaching Is a Three Year Vocational Program.
Nov 10, 2019, 3:33 PM TEACHING IS A THREE YEAR VOCATIONAL PROGAM. 1 – Year Instruction Teachable Skills: +Planning, Continuous Revision. +Lesson Instruction (Teaching) +Assessment (where are my kids) Requires Natural Talent: +Environment (managing the classroom for learning) +Mentoring Teachers – Not to TEACH, but to filter people. 1 – year student teaching (apprenticeship) 1 – year mentored teaching (apprenticeship) Fundamental Problems: (a) teachers spend too much time alone. (b) they are not permitted to create order. (c) there are a limited group of people who can maintain their interest in running a classroom. (d) the method of reforming teaching will require radical reform of the method so that it consists of competitive games and includes multiple overlapping grades, and to decrease pressure on programming (indoctrination) and more emphasis on multiple-exposures over time.
-
Anarchy Is Not Internally Consistent or Productive
Anarchy Is Not Internally Consistent or Productive https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/27/anarchy-is-not-internally-consistent-or-productive/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-27 04:33:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265501355281715201
-
The Market = Nature
Dec 7, 2019, 4:44 PM In determination of fitness, the market is the same as nature. one either survival nature in the wild or in the market, or in some combination. But if you cannot survive in the market you are unfit for survival and reproduction. The solution to the majority of resulting conflicts is to separate so that in-group care-taking lowers the threshold.
-
The Market = Nature
Dec 7, 2019, 4:44 PM In determination of fitness, the market is the same as nature. one either survival nature in the wild or in the market, or in some combination. But if you cannot survive in the market you are unfit for survival and reproduction. The solution to the majority of resulting conflicts is to separate so that in-group care-taking lowers the threshold.
-
Follow the Money: Most Profitable Sectors
Dec 19, 2019, 4:02 PM Health the most profitable sector with a 21.6 percent net profit margin. Technology services 17.2 percent net margin were second, narrowly edging past finance 17.1 percent. Electronic technology and consumer nondurables round out the top five. Finance and insurance represent 7.4 percent (or $1.5 trillion) of U.S. gross domestic product or 266B. Health 3,823, (or 3.8T) 21.6% profit is 826B. Tech looks impressive but it doesn’t employ many people. Sort of like electricity., Small market HUGE impact.